Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me V MBNA, last credit card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5234 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks to everyone who helped with my last case, MBNA are trying it again with my other (Last) card, I am a lot more wise and can deal with this better I just want some confirmation about the various bits and pieces.

 

The default notice is Dated 7th April 2009, and the remedy date is 24/4/9, sent 2nd class as normal, they have started to get their act together by posting earlier in the week the 7th being a Tuesday.

 

(b) in the case of second class mail, on the fourth working day after posting.

Posted on the 7th so starting on the 8th, remedy before the 24th so up to the 23rd.

 

Days that count in red.

Just to work it out for the 14 clear days, 8th, 9th, 10th, sat, sun, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th Sat, 19th Sun, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd.

 

To me this is 14 days, so I am pretty stuffed on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The Claimant is CL Finance Ltd this time not MBNA so I assume they are a DCA, proceeding through Howard Cohen and Co. solicitors.

 

I will apply for the CCA from MBNA, its a bit late as the claim was issued on the 18th May but makes it more difficult for them to find on time, they can then choose to either dump the case or ask for more time/stay I guess, confirmation please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr H

 

If CL are claiming, when was the debt assigned to them and did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooopss

 

If they sent it 2nd class and you have the envelope then you should have a rectify date of 29th April imho.

 

Sent 7th tues

4 WORKING days for service, Fri 10th and mon 13th B/Hols, no post! so Weds 15th deemed 4th working day for service, then 14 clear calendar days from that.

 

 

S.

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinions. These opinions are based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal or debt related training.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooopss

 

 

If they sent it 2nd class and you have the envelope then you should have a rectify date of 29th April imho.

 

Sent 7th tues

4 WORKING days for service, Fri 10th and mon 13th B/Hols, no post! so Weds 15th deemed 4th working day for service, then 14 clear calendar days from that.

 

 

S.

 

 

Excellent work...........well spotted.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooopss

 

 

If they sent it 2nd class and you have the envelope then you should have a rectify date of 29th April imho.

 

Sent 7th tues

4 WORKING days for service, Fri 10th and mon 13th B/Hols, no post! so Weds 15th deemed 4th working day for service, then 14 clear calendar days from that.

 

 

S.

 

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinions. These opinions are based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal or debt related training.

 

 

Indeed well spotied. Looks like they forgot about Easter. Shame!

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like MBNA were having an easter sale - my mums card was defaulted the same day, but we got the Default Notice on the Thursday before easter (don't have the envelope to disprove the date) our postman is too efficient :(

 

If its been assigned to CL Finance, check the date of assignment ours was on the 23rd (within the 14day DN period) and check the Termination date if you can aswell. (Chances are yours may have been sold within the same lot as my mums).

 

Did you send a request off to CLF for documents? We sent them two letters and had no response so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool, well spotted, thanks for that, in the bag almost then, still lets get the CCA out of the way and I will locate the letter of assignment for your request, if there was one Docman.

 

I am so glad I asked you guys, the smallest missed detail can mean a major difference in the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like MBNA were having an easter sale - my mums card was defaulted the same day, but we got the Default Notice on the Thursday before easter (don't have the envelope to disprove the date) our postman is too efficient :(

 

 

It doesn't matter what the date on the postmark says (there isn't one anyway) It doesn't matter what date you received it either its only deemed served after the 4 full working days after posting for second class, if you kept the envelope it helps, not sure if you need to prove it was sent second class or they need to prove it was sent first class but you should be able to squash the case on that alone.

 

If its been assigned to CL Finance, check the date of assignment ours was on the 23rd (within the 14day DN period) and check the Termination date if you can aswell. (Chances are yours may have been sold within the same lot as my mums).

 

Looking into it

 

Did you send a request off to CLF for documents? We sent them two letters and had no response so far.

 

In the process

 

 

Just goes to show the power of CAG, the ones with CAG will (should) win their cases if DN in the same period, the ones without pretty much unlikely, CAG FTW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well had another look around for any MBNA/Abbey envelopes, couldn't find anything that looks like the Default Notices came in, however I did find three envelopes sent via Royal Mail Second Class; a postcard, a random envelope from 2005 and their response to our latest complaint all Second Class.

 

Statements are sent via UKMail (don't know what there timescales are).

 

So clearly not all letters are sent First class (if any), so should hopefuly get them to prove how it was sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a way to cut the carp and tell them they don't have a valid DN, Restons lost their case for £21K last time, their case is doomed to failure can you please forget about me and crawl back under your stone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a way to cut the carp and tell them they don't have a valid DN, Restons lost their case for £21K last time, their case is doomed to failure can you please forget about me and crawl back under your stone.

 

I dont think there is. Have they terminated the account?

 

If they do issue court proceedings then you can apply for a summary judgement on the issue of no valid default notice means no valid case.

 

S.

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinions. These opinions are based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal or debt related training.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a way to cut the carp and tell them they don't have a valid DN, Restons lost their case for £21K last time, their case is doomed to failure can you please forget about me and crawl back under your stone.

 

Until they have terminated the agreement you don't want to tell them anything

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a way to cut the carp and tell them they don't have a valid DN, Restons lost their case for £21K last time, their case is doomed to failure can you please forget about me and crawl back under your stone.

 

They don't seem to care whether they have a case or not, we wrote to them saying we'd been told the account had been sold, please provide some documents - their response was they don't know whats happening have no documents but are going to court anyway.

 

I'd make sure you have some proof about the account being terminated before telling them their DN is invalid.

 

You can then tell them they don't have a case, and if it goes to court tell the court you told them they didn't have a case but they went to court anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am in a situation where I need to submit my case to the court shortly, Do I go for the invalid DN now or try to get them to supply a valid CCA, I have sent the letter asking them to supply the details and they said they do not need to.

 

I have a defence that I used last time thanks to Creditcardmug

 

Between

xxxxxxxxxxx- Claimant

 

and

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx- Defendant

 

 

 

Defence

 

1. I xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due,or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

4. Consequently, I deny all allegations on the particulars of claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof

 

5. I respectfully request the courts permission to submit an amended defence should the claimant file a fully particularised Particulars of Claim

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I xxxxxxxxxxx, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

Signed .....................

 

Date

 

 

Is this still valid for this case

 

Particulars of claim

 

 

The claimants claim is for the sum of $$$.$$ being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated credit agreement between tee defendant and MBNA Europe Bank Ltd under reference ************* and assigned to the claimant on 23rd April 2009 notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

The defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served pursuant to section 87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974.

 

The claimant claims the sum of $$$.$$.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the initial defence, through the online thing after submitting the AoS?

 

You may just want to keep it simple short and simple at this stage - they refused to send documents.

 

Hit them with the DN if they actually provide a copy of the agreement.

 

At least you actually got a response from them, we haven't heard anything yet.

 

It also appears your Particulars of claim are identical to ours, you may also want to get a copy of your credit file, as we found something surprising on my mums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

They sprung a last minute witness statement on me received 12/12, I have a court hearing on the 17th, I have determined that the default notice is invalid, I have a copy of a CCA which looks very clear but not sure if it is valid, I have little chance to prepare my witness statement and get a copy of the details to the claimant and the court before the 17th.

 

Can I just use the default notice as a defence and make a complaint regarding insufficient time to prepare, I rang the court on the 11/12 because I hadnt been given a hearing date and told it was due on the 17th,

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sprung a last minute witness statement on me received 12/12, I have a court hearing on the 17th, I have determined that the default notice is invalid, I have a copy of a CCA which looks very clear but not sure if it is valid, I have little chance to prepare my witness statement and get a copy of the details to the claimant and the court before the 17th.

 

Can I just use the default notice as a defence and make a complaint regarding insufficient time to prepare, I rang the court on the 11/12 because I hadnt been given a hearing date and told it was due on the 17th,

 

Ok can we back up a bit... we seem to be missing a great chunk of whats gone on so far....

 

1) Have you received anything in the post from the court giving the hearing date 17th dec.

 

2) Did the copy of the CCA/Default notice get sent along with the witness statement?

 

3) Can you scan the CCA and post it up so we can see it (ensure you remove all personal identifying stuff)

 

4) Might want to post up the default notice too.

 

5) Have you received anything else from the other side since the intitial claim?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my defence as in post 15, the court made an order for the particulars of claim to be sent to me and to the court, and just before the deadline I received a letter from the court saying "that the claimants fax be deemed to be an application to reinstate the case"

I had not received detailed particulars of claim or a hearing notice.

 

2/ The CCA was enclosed with the witness statement but the default notice was just mentioned and not sent (I have the original invalid notice).

 

3/ will scan shortly (added as a pdf attachment)

 

5/ Haven't received anything except invitations to pay.

mbnaccasmall.pdf

Edited by Mr Happy
Link to post
Share on other sites

1/ Does the CCA look OK anyone, does to me but nice to have a second opinion.

 

2/ what's the latest about invalid default notice, things have changed since I started my first MBNA saga, It started off invalid default notice no case, then no default notice they can only claim the arrears, next I hear it means nothing.

 

3/ Howard Cohen say because it is small claims court they dont need to supply the CCA, is this true? if not they have not upheld their obligation under a court order, how does this affect their case?

 

4/ HC supplied their case file late (5 days from trial) does this invalidate their claim because I had insifficient time to prepare a defence.

 

My hearing is tomorrow so a quick response would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...