Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

How do they repay?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi telrac :)

 

They are using what is called 'Right of Set-off' which basically means they can transfer money between accounts to settle debts .

 

However there are conditions to be met before they can do this . Have a look at this link and see if you can fault them on any of the conditions ....

 

Right of set-off ...............

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

 

 

There is one which you may be able to use as a lever ......

 

"The debt must be due and payable. For example, if a customer misses making a loan payment, then (at least until it calls in the loan) the firm can take only the missed payment – not the balance of the loan."

 

In your case if you have no missed payments , IMHO - they can't do this, because , as you say that is a credit from a different account altogether . They are quick enough to point out that PPI is a separate entity if you're asking for details so you can claim mis-sold policies ........

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Johnny, the link is very helpful and I think supports my case. I'm a Senior Legal Executive in a N.I. law firm and my boss has agreed to sign a letter on our headed paper calling for full rebate of monies and loan account to be restored to previous balance. Will tell them if not sorted within 7 days will be referring to FOS. Will probably end up having to contact fos anyway but maybe this is worth a try..... will keep ya posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy to help , telrac - go get 'em ! :D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got further message back from Egg saying that as this was a single premium policy it's not refundable to the customer and has to be paid to the loan account - does anyone know what they're getting at or are they just trying to confuse me?!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds like gobbledegook to me :rolleyes:. but hopefully aa or someone else more clued up than me can throw some light on it ........

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got further message back from Egg saying that as this was a single premium policy it's not refundable to the customer and has to be paid to the loan account - does anyone know what they're getting at or are they just trying to confuse me?!!

 

If it is a single premium policy it is even more mis-sold.( As they have acknowledged).

They are talking garbage about it not being refundable, if you have made all the payments and are not in any arrears or defaulted in any way then they cannot offset the PPI refund against any outstanding balance. As they have agreed it was mis-sold and were prepared to settle on £4,800 then that money if you were up to date with your payments should have been refunded to you by way of a personal cheque.

 

Write an tell them they are not allowed to do this. If they do not reverse their decision then if is time for a serious complaint to the Financial Services Authority and the Office of Fair Trading.

 

You should also seek advice from the legal forums on this issue there you may get further advice.

  • Haha 1

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice aa! Am very fired up about this, especially as have been on another consumer forum where a few other people seem to have come across this exact problem with Egg and as far as I can tell none of them have yet managed to get their money back in their hand although FOS are looking into things in a couple of cases. I notice in my T & C that it states the agreement will comply with laws of England & Wales unless the customer lives in Scotland or N Ireland (I am in NI) in which case the laws of that country apply. I'm now looking at NI statutes to see if I can persuade them that way - i also think this leaves me free to issue proceedings over here (which would be more hassle for them) if it ends up being necessary. Maybe I'm jumping the gun and will give them chance to respond to the solicitor's letter and FOS first but just v determined they will not get away with this! Feel like I have the money in my hand but can't get my hand out of the hole in the tree!!!:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reply to solicitors letter came in this morning - they are still maintaining they have the right to apply refund to the loan balance and the matter should be referred to FOS if still unhappy. T & C actually say "Except where otherwise provided in this Policy, all refunds of premium and genefits payable under this Policy shall be paid to Us for the credit of the Agreement" Nonetheless my boss (the Solicitor) says this does not apply in a case where the policy is missold as they still should be returning me to the position I would have been in if the policy not missold to me. He has written back stating this and also that a large part of the refund is made up of interest and compensation and it's not purely a "refund of premium". He's also drawn attention to the reference to being treated under NI law if the customer lives in NI and has asked them to nominate solicitors here for service of Proceedings...... will keep you posted!:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks telrac - watching with interest ..... :) . I also believe your boss is right about the interpretation of the T & Cs ..... be interesting to see what a court would make of it ....

 

Haven't you got any friends who are judges telrac ? lol! :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks telrac - watching with interest ..... :) . I also believe your boss is right about the interpretation of the T & Cs ..... be interesting to see what a court would make of it ....

 

Haven't you got any friends who are judges telrac ? lol! :)

 

Most of them here you wouldn't admit to knowing anyway!!:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

An update... Wrote a general rant to a load of consumer champions and copied to Egg. They wrote back 30th july saying that since i had referred my claim to the FOS they would await their review. Rang Egg today for an update and not only was there no change but they said they had no record of having heard from FOS in my case!! I drew their letter 30th July to their attention but still insisted had heard nothing from FOS and file closed! Rang FOS and they were v sympathetic but said all they could really do was send their initial letter again and await the response within 8 weeks..... until I mentioned the letter sent by Egg on 30th July! The guy at FOS then said this constituted a 'final answer' by Egg and asked me to forward the letter and my complaints form and he would be able to deal with this immediately - also implied I should get my money refunded in full and account brought back to it's position prior to them crediting the refund against my loan balance. Hardly dare hope at this stage but keeping everything crossed.... Just shows what an awkward, non co-operative lying bunch Egg really are!! Will keep ya posted ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine the FOS are able to deal with this quickly as EGG have already been fined a hefty sum.

 

Good result so far though well done.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking good for you. We live in hope that the FOS do their stuff. It could take a while but a 90% uphold on consumer complaints on mis-sold PPI seems ok to me :D

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...