Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Apex Discovery Solutions 'found' me but I haven't answered them yet - CCA them?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5331 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I hope someone can help me.

 

Apex have sent a letter to 'occupier' at the address of a room I am renting, to see if they know of my whereabouts or whether I live here.

 

Due to a disastrous financial failure (job loss, flat loss, partner loss etc) I have stopped paying a Halifax card about a year ago. But, there is not any evidence in the letter if this is regarding that specifically, and they can't even confirm I am here or not.

 

I have no money and am now a student (not even working yet)... I want to come clean with them finally and offer what I can (which is nearly nil, but even if a judge decides on £10 a month I'll do what I can).

 

My question is, do I send them a CCA request even though I don't know precisely what / who they are collecting for, nor have they confirmed my identity at this address?

 

> My landlady is about 70, and opened the letter saying to call an 0844 number *immediately* if they have any information about me... naturally she thinks the CIA or something is after me so I don't want them to start harassing her or me by sending more scary letters like this that she will open.

 

Should I send them a CCA request, fessing up they found me, but not referring to any specific debt/card, leaving it to THEM to identify whom they represent?

 

Thanks for your help! :)

 

(It's probably about £1500 that I owe)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks harassed senior, I think that will be very useful!

 

They haven't even said they are trying to collect on a debt yet, they are trying to confirm whether I even live here or not... it is addressed to 'occupier' and just says 'We are attempting to contact the above named person regarding a personal matter and we have been provided your address as being the possible residential details for our subject"

 

"our subject"? is this a letter from Her Majesty The Queen?

 

But seriously, how legal is this, that they demand "occupier" call them "immediately" (which is bold and underlined) regarding a third party?

 

It's a major psychological scare tactic, and I doubt its legality the more I think about it. Why aren't they just sending a letter TO ME at this address????

 

Something is very rotten here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to send it recorded delivery keeping a copy with your postal receipt.

 

Make a complaint to yours and thier TS and the OFT re them sending a letter to 'the occupier', it's against OFT guidlines to do this ;)

 

Good luck and best wishes :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to send it recorded delivery keeping a copy with your postal receipt.

 

Make a complaint to yours and thier TS and the OFT re them sending a letter to 'the occupier', it's against OFT guidlines to do this ;)

 

Good luck and best wishes :)

 

yes babybear39, I was just thinking the same thing as you can see from my last post... I think I am going to get cracking on those complaints letters immediately, this has really upset my landlady and I had to do a real raindance to calm her down yesterday :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you, but they never go the sensible and pleasant route why be nice when they can be down right nasty and rude:(

 

I would say this is almost definitely some kind of DCA as I have seen this on several occasions and it almost always proves to be so.

 

When you have contacted them and get a reply identifying themselves, I would then report them to OFT: Trading Standards and ICO. This kind of approach is being frowned on at the moment and the more people that complain the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This forum is ace.

 

Here's my letter to them so far:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference no: XXXXXX

 

You have contacted the owner of the property where I am residing, referring to them as “occupier”, regarding the above reference number.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any ‘personal matters’ with, or debt being owed to, Apex Discovery Solutions.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Contacting anyone other than myself at this address is tantamount to physical / psychological harassment and will be treated as such. I am reporting your conduct to the OFT as a result of your actions in this instance.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning this matter unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for any debt or involvement in any ‘personal matters’ with yourselves in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter will be handled with respect for the guidelines set out by the OFT going forward.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

( NO SIGNATURES! )

 

 

Mrs XXXXX

 

CC: OFT, London EC4BXXX

 

 

...any other suggestions? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This forum is ace.

 

Here's my letter to them so far:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference no: XXXXXX

 

You have contacted the owner of the property where I am residing, referring to them as “occupier”, regarding the above reference number.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any ‘personal matters’ with, or debt being owed to, Apex Discovery Solutions.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Contacting anyone other than myself at this address is tantamount to physical / psychological harassment and will be treated as such. I am reporting your conduct to the OFT as a result of your actions in this instance.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning this matter unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for any debt or involvement in any ‘personal matters’ with yourselves in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter will be handled with respect for the guidelines set out by the OFT going forward.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

( NO SIGNATURES! )

 

 

Mrs XXXXX

 

CC: OFT, London EC4BXXX

 

 

...any other suggestions? :)

 

Get rid of the red bits as you 'don't know it's a debt' ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

update 1: of course the cheeky beggars sent another one off the next day which arrived today... once explaining how out of order they are to my landlady she totally understood & just laughed about it.

 

both my letter to them, and my complaint form to the OFT, went out today :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It won't be long before we will have a translation book of the 'written word' into English that can be understood by DCAs and 'some' other office staff.:confused:

 

I know I am of a great age when we actually learnt how to write and speak English as a child, but the things I see now make me cringe (oh er is that spelt correctly)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi, thanks for asking.

 

I wrote and told them how not on it was, and that I was reporting them to the OFT (which I did, forms and all), and never heard from them again.

 

Yet the OFT said they couldn't do anything for me since I was filing as an individual, but that they had no existing record of this firm acting inappropriately/illegally... but that doesn't mean they haven't been flagged up either.

 

Apex appear to have sold it on to someone else (Lewis something, I think?) whom seem to be trying to do things by the letter - I did the CCA request, etc., to which they replied my account is "on hold" for 28 days until they can deal with it.

 

I'll check who it was and post to see what other people's experiences have been with this new firm. They are, for a DCA, seemingly rather civilised at this point!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...