Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marlin/phoenix - Credit Card - N1 Received ** DISCONTINUED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have a CC and have been paying by a DMP. On the 27 Feb 2008 we requested a copy of the CCA. No reply was received and after receiving a LBA we sent the standard dispute letter, their answer to this was to issue an N1. We again asked for the copy of the agreement under the CPR and still nothing. An embarrassed defence has been submitted and an AQ has to be done over the weekend. This will obviously be done as dont want them to sneak a CCJ in

 

We have recieved a Tomlin Order and a letter stating that they have requested the documentation and it will be supplied in due course, but they feel that that having made payments we have admitted the account. Also that we have asked for documentation thats over 6 years old (the CC was taken out in 2003) then we are attempting to frustrate the court proceedings.

 

The tomlin order is again for the same monthly payment we have been paying them, but there is a review clause, which obviously we would request being removed before signing.

 

BUT and a big but, what is the likliehodd that they havent got any documentation, should be hold out to settle for a while and see what happens. Should we sent a letter suggesting a slightly lower offer and see what happens.

 

Advice would be appreciated please

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 259
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

wait for more replies on this one

a tomlin order is a legal document

 

sign nothing until you have a cca agreement in your hand

 

ive read some horror stories ref tomlin orders

 

wait for more replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't sign a Tomlin order....that has to be a completely last resort CG....it makes no difference if you have paid or not a dispute can be raised at ANY point....And they are ALSO trying to mislead you, by THEM stating that you are asking for paperwork that obviously ISN'T over 6 years old.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please could you give me an idea of the horror stories you have seen re Tomlins. I have another one in the pipeline, but that doesnt have a review clause and I certainly would not be accepting this one without the clause being taken out.

 

Just wondering if there are any other things that I should watch out for.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Right, I sent back my AQ ages ago and the court stayed the claim until last Monday in order for the documents to be supplied by Marlin.

 

Surprise, surprise, they have have sent some of the requested items, but have ignored letters requesting the most important ones, ie default notice and CCA. They also sent a letter stating they would advise the court that they had tried to sort out the matter with us and we hadnt complied. This didnt bother me.

 

What my question was, what happens now, does the court then insist that Marlin complete their AQ and provide the documents, or should I be looking to get it struck out.

 

Help and advise would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Another update and help need please.

 

The court has stayed this case again until next month, with a view to Mortimer informing them of the progress.

 

Today I received a letter from Mortimer and the bit I need help with is

 

We confirm Default Notices issued by HSBC are standard and in a prescribed format in compliance with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. HSBC issuded the default notice to you and it was not returned by the Post Office. The Default notice is deemed validly served even if you did not receive it, in accordance with Section 176 (2) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

We therefore feel you are making an attempt at frustrating court proceedings by refusing to negotiate settlement without a copy of the Default Notice, this will be disclosed to the court should the matter proceed to trial.

 

In light of the above we provide you with a last opportunity to settle before this claim be allocated to a Fast Track trial where, if our client is successful, you will be liable for further costs. If you are in agreement we require you to sign the enclosed Consent Order within 7 days.

 

I am not signing the consent order as feel there is no proof that a default notice was even sent. Any thoughts on how to proceed with this.

 

I have finally have a copy of the agreement and believe thats in order.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know whether the post by BRW will help any.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2166205.html

 

I would go so far as to say it is HSBC who are trying to frustrate proceedings.

 

Hw ridiculous to say it was deemed validly served even if you didnt receive it.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Craftygirl

 

There will be charges added to this account for late payment, maybe overlimit fees as well. You need to claim these back. Do you have your statements going back to when the account was opened?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Craftygirl

 

There will be charges added to this account for late payment, maybe overlimit fees as well. You need to claim these back. Do you have your statements going back to when the account was opened?

 

 

Yes I do. Marlin kindly supplied these to me :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this separate to the other Marlin overdraft debt CG ? I notice you say 'agreement' ?

 

 

42man this is a credit card. The overdraft was sorted via mediation some time ago. That was another thread.

 

The order from the court actually states

 

the claim be stayed until 4pm on X XXXX 2009 when the claimant's solicitors shall inform the court in writing of progress in the claim.

 

 

This is the 2nd time the Court has stayed it. The first ran out earlier this month and now this one. The first one gave them about 2 months respond. They still havent filed an AQ

 

If I was going to apply for a strike out, would you suggest I write now or after the date its been stayed until.

Link to post
Share on other sites

42man this is a credit card. The overdraft was sorted via mediation some time ago. That was another thread.

 

The order from the court actually states

 

the claim be stayed until 4pm on X XXXX 2009 when the claimant's solicitors shall inform the court in writing of progress in the claim. Does it give you 7 days to object ?

 

 

This is the 2nd time the Court has stayed it. The first ran out earlier this month and now this one. The first one gave them about 2 months respond. They still havent filed an AQ

 

If I was going to apply for a strike out, would you suggest I write now or after the date its been stayed until.

Now, make application in opposition to the stay and apply to strike out on the grounds of the Claimants behaviour in this matter.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crafty...

 

They are definitely dragging their heels on this one.... stand firm and fight back... they will try and convince you that you are in the wrong every time...that is their way, unfortunately many people believe them.:rolleyes:

 

If they really had the documents you would have seen them by now..

 

Please, don't let them intimidate you.

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just looked at the DN sent to me by HSBC. From date of the DN to the remedy date is 14 days. There has been no allowance for posting. It was mailed using a UK Mail service which even though marked as "1st" class post, took 6 days to reach me.

 

As far as I can make out, Default notices are automated and processed through HSBC's Bulk Mailing Centre.

 

I guess one question you could ask is for them to advise the policy for sorting and recording returned mail. Especially as they also appear to havae a policy of saying that letters havent been received even where the sender has proof of receipt by way of tracking receipts.

 

I have noticed Default notices sent to other HSBC victims have not given the clear 14 days required by law and that they too have been sent either by 2nd class or UK mail post.

 

In the event you didnt receive a DN, you are entitled to put them to strict proof that it was sent and the dates of both the DN and the remedy date. That isnt attempting to frustrate proceedings, but your right to the information.

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following link shows a draft order where the DJ has ordered the Claimant to produce not only a copy of the Default Notice but proof of service.. so methinks Marlin are trying it on.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2056007.html

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I do. Marlin kindly supplied these to me :D

 

What sort of figures are we looking at here Craftygirl?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the claim amount?which track is it likely to be allocated to?

 

 

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes with FT you have more Disclosure / Directions power than SCT (along with costs), see CBs post above.I assume you have submitted your AQ along with your Directions.The Claimant will not commit to the AQ unless they are sure they wish to proceed and that they have all the relevent paperwork in order.What date do they have to submit theirs by? If its past then apply to strike out,thats he penalty for frustrating matters.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...