Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • When it comes to animals my heart is just shallow. Sorry to hear that.
    • go back and read what andyorch said in my above links about a DEED of assignment NOT being a Notice Of Assignment. its a general document for a portfolio of MANY debts they bought on a spreadsheet, NOT specifically relating to YOUR Agreement. but your was like all others, a single line in a spreadsheet.    the sheriff has specifically asked for the NOA and the Default Notice ...neither of which the fleecers have provided, merly a load of ole twaddle like trump does to divert attention away from those NOT being provided.   forget the stuff about LOP 1925 etc that a NOE is NOT applicable in scotland , the sheriff has asked for it..end of!!   bedtime reading particularly regarding default notice sec 87 https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?484300-Cabot-nolans-SPC-Claim-Old-Next-CAT-Debt(2-Viewing)-nbsp&p=5119630#post5119630   read from about post 70.   as for the written submission. i'll find an example later.   dx      
    • Plevin is not a calculation. its a refund of commission they got as they had a backhander of greater than 50% of the PPI sum paid for selling it on behalf of the insurance company that underwrote the PPI policy.   you are after reclaiming the PPI itself. and that is what all our PPI stuff is geared too.   have you still a copy of what you originally sent though as you don't even KNOW what plevin was , how could you have ever have asked for it.!!   pers i'd write back. (you seriously need to stop talking on the phone!!) stating quite clearly that you REJECT totally their refund under the Plevin Rules. my Claim was to reclaim the PPI a paid, not for a refund of your hidden commission!!   i give your 14 days to refund inline with the enclosed spreadsheet , else i will raise a complaint without further notice to the FOS.   please reply in Writing Only.            
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

AMEX/Newman's (again!)

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4027 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi To all and an apology for any overlapping with other posts re Amex &/or Newman DCA.

I won't bore you with my earliest dealings with Amex &/or Newman's, suffice it to say that it follows, almost exactly, the same path as others have reported. To that end, a brief summary of where I am following a CCA(s77-79) request to Newman's, sent by recorded delivery on 13th May 2009 (letter dated 12/05/09), plus a request for a copy of their internal complaints procedure, giving them 12 working days from receipt of the letter to reply. [This cuts out all the preliminary telephone and letter exchanges since early April].


Today, I received a reply from Newman's (dated 27/05/09) comprising a cover letter (brief to the point of near obscurity), a moderate photocopy of the front page of an Amex "60 Second Application form" (bearing my signature and dated June 2002 but having a date stamp that appears to say 2082! No other signatures) and a copy of their "Internal Complaints Process" (which, as another post reports, is a flow chart marked "Complaints Process Version 1", authored in May 2007).


Having followed the various Amex threads here, I've got an idea of what's meant to happen and what should have been supplied; a photocopy of the application (no terms or conditions at all and no sight of the contract between Amex and myself) is, I'm sure, hopelessly inadequate as a reply. The flowchart for complaints handling was requested following a 6 point letter of complaint that I'd sent (cc'd to the OFT), to which their response was that complaints to them, the CSA or the OFT would be handled in the "appropriate way" - I wanted clarification of what "the appropriate way" was. [it seems to involve both more than they offered and a different method of handling than used].


Pertinent Document background:

Letter / Dated / Document Issued by Amex / Date Received

1) 18/03/2009. Default Notice served, under section 87(1) of the CCA 1974. 26/03/09

2) 02/04/2009. Notice of Default Sums, under section 86(E), CCA 1974. 07/04/09

3) 04/04/2009. Notice of Cancellation of Amex Credit Card Account. 10/04/09


1) States that " ... £xxx.xx must be received within fourteen calendar days from the date of this Default Notice." - presumably breaching the allowance for time in post (in this case, apparently, 8 days!).

2) Added an "Administrative Fee" of £xxx.xx (roughly 1/6th the outstanding amount) and asserted that payment was due on 06/04/2009 - Payment due within 4 days of document preparation and one day before I received it.

3) Notice of cancellation of "your account and credit card account agreement with immediate effect" - if the account is cancelled, then why does the amount outstanding go up every time I receive a new letter from Newman's?

I've disputed the original 16% fee as being disproportionate to, a) the work involved and, b) the outstanding balance due, for being excessive to the extent of being punative, and for being arbitrary, as I can find no documentation that provides for the levying of fees or charges against the account in the event of default (or for any other reasons, come to that!). Amex's response seems to be that they've charged it because they can, whilst Newman's haven't offered a reply at all, though they do call it a "Collection Fee" (which I'm more inclined to believe). Either way, following the issuance of 3), I fail to see how the total amount keeps going up each month?


I presume that I should now go back to Newman's and point out that they haven't supplied the requested documents but, should I now go directly to Amex as well?


I went the CCA (s77-79) route after Newman's set Cope's Solicitors on me and I wanted a breathing space, I don't really feel that I'm finished with Newman's yet. As an aside, Cope's must do a lot of this stuff. It was a stock letter, run off on a photocopier with a failing drum, poorly written and contained grammatical errors - presumably a junior clerk had knocked it up during a 2 minute tea break.


It may seem that I'm in full control, but I'm actually getting to the semi-burned out stage as I'm also fighting Lloyds-TSB (I'll post any reply I get from a CCA(s77-79) request plus demand for a copy of their "Solver Guidelines", which seem to breach Banking Code and OFT guidelines) whilst juggling with other creditors and the DWP, who saw fit to suspend my benefits in early March, without telling me :-x


I'm also dealing with National Debtline, trying to sort out a payments plan (gee, I'll only be 73 by the time I'm free and clear!) before the DWP managed to screw that up, and will probably continue to do so if it's at all viable to continue.


Sorry for the somewhat disjointed account, I don't think I'm quite 100% with it today - a mixture of Newman's and medication does that to me.




N.b. Whilst I have nothing by way of money to donate to the site, I will happily give what help I can to anyone having general insurance problems (I'm an ex underwriter of US property business but do have a decent working knowledge of UK policies and practices - policy jargon etc.).

If I'd have known then what I know now I'd probably still have messed it up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an update to my Lloyds-TSB CCA(s77-79) request (plus demand of production of their "Solver Guidelines" documentation).


I received, today, a letter from Lloyds-TSB that completely ignores the CCA request (it doesn't even mention it!) and comprises a personal finances form to fill in and offer of help sorting out my finances - it's like a time loop and we've returned to the beginning of April! They've had the financial breakdown already, they refused the offer settlement as it didn't meet their "Solver Guidelines" and that was what prompted my request under CCA(s77-79) in the first place :rolleyes:.

Do I now write requesting the details again or to point out that they are in breach of the CCA rules (have had my £1 and don't get to pass "Go")?



If I'd have known then what I know now I'd probably still have messed it up!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...

Just a note for anyone reading and getting the Amex two step - check out this link in Smouk's thread: Amex Action Group item #83.



Edited by Jargonbuster
missed out post number

If I'd have known then what I know now I'd probably still have messed it up!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...