Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

One in the eye for the DCA's - Avoiding harrassing phone calls if you dont want to change your numbers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5435 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ive mentioned this service on a couple of posts, but I thought Id post it here in the hope it will help people who are experiencing distressing phone calls (from anyone) at all times of the day and night.

 

www.yac.com offer a free telephone service whereby when you sign up you will be given 070 number which is an all-encompassing number, therefore allowing you to screen the calls you receive - but if you only give the number to the DCA's they will constantly be phoning a number where they will receive no reply. All you have to do is not check the answering service - so no distressing phone calls from DCA's. Yac's site states:

 

'Instead of having to give your contacts your home number, mobile number, work number, and fax number, you can give them just one number, your Yac Number!

 

Please note that 070 personal numbering services are not guaranteed to be accessible when called from outside the UK – therefore are only suitable if your callers are based in the UK'

 

 

It is available to private individuals and businesses - I was advised of the service a bit late after changing my phone number 3 times. However, I'd never notified any of the DCA's or OC that I changed my phone number, so I cant enjoy the effects of Yac on DCA's. However, I find it a useful service for a variety of things. You dont even need a phone to use the service! It has provisions for email also.

 

The absolute beauty of it is that the caller has to pay 42.533ppm excluding VAT; what a sting in the tail :lol: - I suspect thats what funds the free service. ;)

 

If you're interested check out the website and look at the bottom right hand corner of the home page where it has the link for the personal service www.yac.com

 

They've got a call queing service but that incurs a charge. I would have really liked that service giving the yac number to all the DCA's so if more than one called the number at the same time, they'd be told they were in a que, hear piped in que music and when they reach the top of the que they'd get an answerphone - thats on a 30 day free trial atm - such a shame I didnt have knowledge of this sooner :(

 

On their testimonial page, I have noticed that one testimonial is a technical officer at BT.

I highly recommend the service :D.

 

 

Oh I forgot to mention so Im adding this in edit - as well as screening calls, you can bar phone numbers so that they go straight to voicemail. You can also analyise the calls you've received so you can see how many times a DCA called and which number the call was from. Please note, there may be a charge for email to fax, name call screening and the call history report, but I havent needed these services so I dont know about that one. If your interested just make an enquiry to Yac. I hope this all helps.

Edited by summanotre
extra info

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agreed. But all of my 3 previous phone numbers were ex-directory - each OC passed on my telephone details until I got savvy and after the last change I have only communicated in writing.

 

The point is that if you do use yac the DCA's can no longer continually harass you using a phone number that you dont want to change just because of them (thread title states this) - if your phone is not already a witheld number just dial 141 (to hide your number) when you get through to the DCA you give the yac number and tell them its your new contact number. It goes straight onto the computer. And as you have notified them that you have changed your phone number to a legitimate number the call will be logged and therefore you have 'assisted' them with your account.

 

Personally, I would have liked to have used the service just for the pure satisfaction that some brainless twit from a DCA would keep calling this number, always getting a voicemail message and paying 42.533ppm excludingVAT for the privelege, especially when a request has been made to put all communication in writing that has been ignored by the DCA.

 

:D

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to YAC, you can also use Redstone, Flextel, Skype, and a slew of VOIP providers who will issue you with a virtual telephone number that can even be set up to reject anonymous calls, and/or sent the recorded call to you as an MP£/WMA file to listen at you leisure.

 

If anyone supplies their number as part of an application process, they need to remember that this number will be passed on to anyone down the line should the firm wish to contact you or if the account falls into arrears. I originally used to put Ex-D when it asked for a phone number, for those that insisted on a number, I gave them an 07050 or 0870 alternative. That shut them up, and my home phone remained unsullied by their attempts to sell me more items.

 

Best yet, when you DO get a call offering to 'upgrade' your mobile (or whatever) you KNOW it is a [problem], and they've simply random dialled your number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great - so many! which company gives you an 0870 number & what is the charge to the caller? :)

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bum! :|

 

Do you know which one charges the most for callers? :cool: *snigger*

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's still 070 numbers (for now) - there's no revenue share, but it does cos them a fair bit to call you, and I think I earned almost £40 over the years just by keeping them talking... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked flextel because I was intrigued, so the 0701 & 0705 are for personal users - but 0844, 0870 & 0871 are free for business users - those may come in handy for people who run their own businesses.

 

I think Im going to check what their rules are for free business numbers...

 

Wouldnt it be funny if you gave out an 08XX number as your business/work number & 070X as your mobile number (they do resemble mobile numbers)? Theyd be going round in circles and getting charged through the nose for it - Oh I soooo wanna do that!

Edited by summanotre

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - you do appreciate what I've set up then. Dince the system also detects anonymous numbers and allows you to send them directly to voicemail unanswered or transferred to a 'real' phone, it is a very clever 'free' service.

 

CAG was to investicgate offering a branded service for members (or some form of 'deal') but after 2 years nothing was heard of it....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed I do - so smart! Having read your post that intrigued me, I checked out Flextel & it appears I can still have an 08XX and have it set up to divert calls to the Yac number (the one that costs the caller 42.533pm ex vat) & on top of that there is great flexibility with both account providers (or probably all similar providers) to adjust your services to suit you!

 

So if Ive got this right, DCA's will pay for the call to the 08XX number then pay 42.533ppm for the call from the flextel 08XX to the yac 07XX, thereby paying 2 charges??

 

Sweeeeeet if thats the case! Sweet in any case! :D

 

Its a shame CAG have'nt done the branded thing - I for one wouldnt have minded paying a reasonable set up fee

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - there's no doubling up. I discontinued YAC as there were reliability issues, but Flextel has never let me down. A double divert that you outlined may well fail, as there is a limit on the number of times a divert can take place, and in any event a DCA will only pay the billed rate for the for the first call - nothing more.

 

Interestingly, Flextel will also provide you with the initial CLI of any Withheld number calling you, the last few sigits are replaced with XXXs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubling up? What a shame! Still in DCA's eyes you will have provided 2 phone numbers they can call you on.

 

What sort of reliability issues were they with Yac?

 

Ive not had my yac number for a very long time - so far no problems, but its not used that much - mostly emergency back up.

 

'Interestingly, Flextel will also provide you with the initial CLI of any Withheld number calling you, the last few sigits are replaced with XXXs.'

 

So you cant see all of number? Do any providers allow you to see the whole of the witheld numbers? Although my understanding is that you have the choice to activate a service to redirect witheld numbers to where you want such as voicemail where they have to identify themselves.

 

And do you mean that if a DCA phoned one of the yac or flextel numbers they would only be charged once but if they phone you after the first call on a regular basis they wont be charged for any subseqent calls?

 

Or have I got that screwy?

Edited by summanotre

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

YAC was prone to fail when it had multiple calls arriving to the same destination, or there was silence as it failed to route the inbound call anywhere useful. It didn;t happen all the time, and no recognised pattern to the failure could be ascertained, but it wasn't a major concern.

 

As a telco, Flextel would be in breach of their T&Cs with the regulator if they provided in full a number that was withheld/private, as it is not meant to be displayed. The fact you get a location it a considerable step forward, and keeps them on the right side of the rules.

 

As you may know, there are TWO number streams, the actual line number the call comes from, and a 'presentation' (or virtual) number that is shown to the recipent as part of the call set up process. In this latter instance the call recipient would see perhaps an 0800 or 0870 number to call back on - another scenatio with digital PABXs is that when using ISDN, the PABX inserts the first part of the line number, with the PABX inptting the last 2 or 3 digits, so that the CLI will provide a number that can be dialled back successfully. In these cases, the actual line number used isn't very useful.

 

How can you get access to these numbers? YOu need a digital connection like ISDN30 which provides a data channel and will provide ALL the data, and tell your system not to display it if flagged as withheld or private. Alternatively, when Skype opened their Skype In service, all nunbers were shown regardless of the 'withheld' flag, but someone complained and they stopped it. Some SIP protocol VOIP providers find it difficult to suppress these numbers :) so is a useful compromise!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was surprised to find quite a few companies offering similar services when I was looking for a wifi hotspot in milton keynes.

 

www.inweb.co.uk/ is an informative site.

 

www.oncetell.co.uk/ is a similar site to those weve been discussing although I was pleased to see that they can provide free temporary phone numbers - one Ive added to my favourites. You could have so much fun with those!

 

www.rectel.co.uk (are they havin a laugh!!) Bit of an unfortunate name *ahem* but they also supply similar services and a telephone call recording service - but for this one make sure you read all the FAQ's as some costs are involved - it depends on whether you dont mind paying per phone call to retrieve the recordings compared to a personal recorder at home.

 

They are introducing a subscription service whereby when you are called on the rectel phone (:eek:) the caller will pay for the call whilst you are recording the conversation - but as yet there are no details about the subscription service bit.

Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum

 

The great thing is to know when to speak and when to keep quiet.

 

(Seneca the Younger (attributed), Proverbs, 74)

 

 

Speech is given to many; intelligence to few - but if its well said, I said it!

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...