Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Aqua card services vs LMH


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5447 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I started to claim back charges sometime ago and then didn't take it any further. I think I got fed up with Aqua and 1st credit who kept saying each other was responsible:rolleyes:

 

Anyway I didn't really hear anything apart from thretograms every now and then from various DCAs until a few weeks ago I started getting phone calls this is when I decided to go back and reclaim these charges.

 

I sent SAR to Aqua who replied with what they had so I totted up charges and sent a request for repayment plus CI. I got a reply offering the difference between 20 and 12.

 

I have been looking for a suitable reply (as I am rubbish at writing letters)but I cant find anything. Does anyone have something to hand which I could use?

 

My plan is to put my claim through the FOS, as I have had sucess with them and have found them to be very helpful.

 

Many thanks in advance:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the £12 was a guideline, not something they CAN charge.

just write back and tell them so.

they must still justify the level of their charges as a breakdown or cough up.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx and post

 

I sent a full SAR to them and received a printed copy of what looks like an agreement, although nothing is signed.

 

My so called balance is very low and the charges cover all of it plus some. I am unsure of what to do about the agreement side of things and would be quite happy to just have the balance wiped and the remainder paid to me.

 

I would like to go for CI, which I asked for in my intial letter.

 

I understand about the 12 pound being a maximum the OFT would allow and I am not going to accept their offer of the difference.

 

I guess there is nothing I need to quote in my reply, I should just tell them I don't accept their offer and ask them to reconsider before I put my claim to the FOS?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a lot you can do

 

an agreement with out your sig

 

seems hbos are doing the manufactured agreement again

 

with out the original, they are stuffed

 

when was the account taken out

 

seems the dca are going to get a nasty surprise me thinks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The card was taken out in 2002. I am not up on agreements but I thought they could produce a copy of an agreement without sigs and get away with it???? as long as it was a copy from when you took out the card. (again i'm not sure) they also have to produce T&C from when the card was taken out????

 

I will post up what I have later.

 

Thanks for taking the time Postggj

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Littlemisshappy

 

For A Start The Regs Change I Believe Aprill 2007

 

Any Agreement Before That Date Come Under The Cca 1974

 

When The Regs Were Changed, A Creditor Can Now Give You A Copy Of What Might Have Been Sent To Comply With The Cca.

 

Any Agreement Under The Cca 1974, Which Yours Is, Needs Your Sig On The Application Form

 

With Out It They Are Stuffed

 

With Out The Original Agreement With Your Sig On, They Cant Enforce And They Know It

Link to post
Share on other sites

just read your thread Post........what a nightmare, but all good in the end.

 

One thing to watch out for they may sell it on and then the new owners (and I use the term loosely) will add a default.

 

I got a default from Aqua but it dissapeared when they sold it on and no one has re-applied a default since?????

 

I am pretty sure I applied over the internet for this card, where do I/they stand with the sigs then?

 

I am just scanning the agreement/s!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again They Are Stuffed

 

The Distant Selling Regs Came In Long After 2002

 

Even Doing It On Line Then, They Need A Valid Sig

 

They Should Have Sent You A Cca To Sign And Return

 

Wait For Confirmation Though But I Believe I Am Correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Postggj

 

The main thing i would like to acheive from this is the account balance to zero and closed with the refund of charges and the remainder paid to me, I would like CI. I feel this is only right because of the interest which I would have paid to them.

 

In my SAR results I received some screen dumps from a company called St Andrews group. (i have no idea who they are) They maybe the company who deals with the PPI?

 

I think I may have agreed to PPI (dont know what I was thinking) although there is nothing in my SAR results which backs this up. But I am not too worried about this.

 

I will draft up a letter rejecting their offer. I will give them time to reflect and allow them 8 weeks from the date of the first letter to give me their final response and then I will go to the FOS. (no harm in trying):)

 

Will post up letter when done for comments.

 

Many thanks:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres my reply

Thank you for your letter dated xxxxxx 2009. The contents of which have been noted.

 

I thank you for your offer to refund the difference between £20 and £12, totaling £xx but respectfully decline this offer.

 

Unless you can provide evidence that these charges are calculated on genuine pre-estimates of your administrative costs, or based on actual losses incurred by you in respect of each charge applied to my account, then it is considered that these charges are contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Schedule 2 (e) of the said regulations gives a non-complete list of terms which may be regarded as unfair, such as a term that requires me as a consumer who fails in his obligations, to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation.

 

I therefore again request a refund of xxx plus interest of xxx charged at 35.900% APR. (Which is the average amount charged to me by you) The total I require in order to satisfy my complaint is xxx

 

I will allow you up to xxx July in which to make your decision and give your final response. (Which will be 8 weeks from when I started my complaint) If I don’t get a satisfactory outcome to my complaint I will put a claim through the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) without further notice.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Any comments?:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

good letter

+ dont forget the stat 8% on top

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...