Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with seller about shipping money after sedning back goods


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

Allow me to introduce myself, my name is Largo and I am somewhere from the deep south of Europe. English is not my native language but I am learning it for some years in school already now so I hope it is good enough to post here, sorry for every mistake I maybe make ;)

 

I have just a little problem with an order I placed at a seller from the UK and I hope this is the right place to ask for some little advice.

I ordered some electrical parts for my tv and clearly explained what I need and which tv (brand, model...) I have and asked if they could send me compatible parts as they were also difficult to get at local stores.

They promised me that they would definitively work and so I ordered them from that mail order shop in the UK. As I was in a hurry I also chose a fast and more expensive way of shipping.

 

Well, unfortunately the parts were not compatible and so I sent the parts back with the request to send me the money back but I only got back the money for the products, not the shipping.

 

Here I wonder now how is the situation in the UK, I expect that in such a situation where the seller gave me false information I should have a right to also get my money for the shipping back as I placed my order based on the promises of the seller which he couldn't keep.

 

If possible, could anyone give me just a few details and if I have the right to get my money back, maybe tell me on what my right is based? Some paragraph or something like that would be useful which I could use in my next letter to the seller :)

 

 

Thanks a lot in advance and greetings!

 

Largo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting-I wasnt aware that spares for TVs was something the UK was good at supplying.

However....I think we need more info.

Can you be more specific as to who you ordered these parts from ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a number of companies in the UK.... not as many as there used to be, but....

 

Partmaster. (Currys).

C.P.C. (Preston)

Wiltsgrove (Birmingham).

R.S. (Birmingham)

Farnell (Manchester)

 

and a few others.

 

But I would have thought that the cost of shipping a small order would make it more commercially viable to source nearer home.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for the replies so far :)

 

If possible I would like to not make the name of the company public yet, as long as I am not sure if they really did something wrong.

 

For now this is what I would like to find out and also I am interested in others opinions. I think it is clear that they should send me amount of money I spent for the shipping, even though they of course spent it, but it just seems unfair to not do that as otherwise I have a loss just because of their wrong information.

 

But I would like to know what the British law says about this, "should" they just give me back the money for shipping of do I have a legal claim on that?

 

Thanks again and greetings :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on their terms and conditions.

Its common for a buyer to have to pay shipping costs for returned items.How much are we talking about here?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on their terms and conditions.

Its common for a buyer to have to pay shipping costs for returned items.How much are we talking about here?

 

It is a little more than 40 GBP, I did choose a faster was of shipping.

 

Actually they already refered to their terms and conditions but I wonder if there are some "higher" laws which say that in this situation they should compensate me because I placed the order in the first place due to their false information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which shipping are you trying to get back? The cost of sending it to you, or sending it back?

 

If they stated the parts would work with your set, and they subsequently turn out not to, you can reject the goods as they do not conform to contract under the Sale of Goods act.

 

This entitles you to a full refund of the monies paid in making the contract (so outbound postage). Return postage is covered as a "consequential damage" and should also be refunded. This applies even if their terms excluded it and they may be comitting an offence by trying to curtail rights under the Sale of Goods act.

 

I am fairly sure that the SOGA applies if you are buying from the UK and you are in Europe, so this might be the way to go.

 

Thanks,

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi:

 

To answer heliosfa's point.

 

Sales across boundaries within the EU are covered by European Directive 1999/44/EC, which set out to provide what EC legislators called a 'baseline' protection for all consumers in Europe

 

The UK Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002 enacted these regulations in UK law. They apply to traders who sell and supply goods (including hire and hire purchase) to consumers irrespective of the localion of the buyer. That is to say, if the seller is within the UK, the buyer can be anywhere in the world.

 

The obligations to provide goods of satisfactory quality are more or less the same as those stipulated under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (see BIF 142 A Guide to the Sale of Goods Act 1979). The Regulations also require traders to provide remedies where goods are not of satisfactory quality.

 

On the more general point; if the goods were supplied to a specification, that is to say you specifically stated this part must work with TV model abcxyz-12345a then they are NOT of suitable quality - this is a SOGA suitability issue.

 

If however, you order part 12345 because you believed them to be compatible due to some advertising or representation then you are still covered by the SOGA but in this case it is a misrepresentation issue.

 

Rejection on grounds of suitability has to be resolved within six months if you want the onus to be on the seller after that and up to 6 years [England and Wales] or 5 years if purchased from Scotland the onus is on you to prove the goods were not suitable.

 

Misrepresentation follows the normal limitation rules of 6 years for England and Wales [5 years for Scotland]. The onus is always on you to make the case if you rely on misrepresentation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...