Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • well we cant help you without information. we need to SEE the org TfL Letter and your reply. we also need to see the SJPN court forms upon WHAT you are ACTUALLY charged with and if there is a TIC List requiring your signature next to each journey and how many journey's are on the list? scan these upto ONE mass PDF read upload CAREFULLY. if your 'lie' of lost card is included in the court docs within a written statements , i can't see you escaping a criminal conviction...sorry. dx    
    • thanks for the fuller story now... sadly on most assumptions you are wrong. i cant see you going anywhere with this . the file can appear twice on your file, but doesn't hurt you twice. OC's are not obliged to default a debt before sale (though if they dont - it renders the debt useless to a debt buyer) . thus Lowell just left it and in 2021 their entry fell off due to 6yrs of no reporting. lowell didn't 'write it off' its an automated CRA File process . The old EE entry was held on your file because of the AP markers, they are a real bugbear to any account and if its never defaulted can cause an account to show for 12yrs on cra files regardless to any balance or not. in your case its sadly somewhat immaterial that EE erroneously used AP, it appears it didn't actually harm you. you cleared the EE entry bal by paying £69 in 2022, that wouldn't have changed anything really. the AP markers held it on your file. so either EE now remove it or you await it's natural drop off 6yrs from the last AP mark.  
    • So my CPR request has come back from Overdales, the same multipage 29 page agreement that came back via the CCA, plus notice of assignment. However no Default notice, or Statement. They just confirm that they have raised a request for a copy of each,.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey - mortgage penalty charges


100mel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5437 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi 100Mel,

 

EOH - irrelevant.

 

100 Mel, yes all such charges are reclaimable, follow the standard bank charge reclaim process adapting the wording. 12 year Statute of Limitations apply, not 6 years (England only). Not sure if you are North of the Border.

 

Abbey will pass to their Solicitors (DLA Piper?) at court stage and file a defence, probably making a counterclaim for an amount not exceeeding £5K. They will then settle in full and drop the Counterclaim.

 

Went through all this in early 2007 - a worthwhile exercise!

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that - payment was late in one month because cheque (I am self employed ) was late in clearing via Abbey bank - hence the £40 hit. To date they have of course refused to do anything

 

Mel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mel 100,

 

YES you can reclaim your mortgage charges back off any mortgage.

 

If you don't know the dates/amounts of charges do the Subject Access Request asking for all the details they hold on your Mortgage Account (do it in joint names if account is joint) Use the bank charges SAR in the template library here - just adapt letter to suit account). OR

 

If you already have a list of the charges they owe you - use the spreadsheet in here to work out the interest owed on each charge from date it was made etc.. (just like for reclaiming bank charges). Print this out and send with an adapted Preliminary request for repayment from the template library - this gives them 14 days to return your money.

 

After the 14 days - send the Letter Before Action with same spreadsheet updated to match new date.

 

Abbey will probably reply you can't have your money back they are right etc..

 

At this stage send all copies of your letters and charges to the Financial Ombudsman Service - use their complaint form linked here in the A-Z - explain you've asked for a refund of these charges and Abbey refuse to pay you back etc..

 

FOS will then look into it and write to Abbey about it. It doesn't matter whether your mortgage is still with Abbey or not - you are entitled to your money back either way.

 

Abbey will usually pay up rather than have FOS investigate this matter.

 

I reclaimed my own Abbey Charges this way and had a full refund plus interest etc.. on the money they took off me.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/69359-cant-find-what-youre.html - this is the A-Z list to help you.

 

Good Luck - the FOS is easier than the court route and costs you nothing - FOS do all the work once you place your complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that it depends if the fee was part of the original agreement - was it an early repayment penalty? Did you change lenders during a fixed rate period for example? if this fee is part of the agreement and you have it in the mortgage offer document I think it is unlikely. I changed lenders in the middle of a fixed period and was stuck with a similar fee

 

Mel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...