Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

laser eye surgery - comments please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Couldn't think of anywhere else to post so posting in here.

I am seriously considering getting this done. Have worn glasses since I was 7 and am just sick of it now.At the moment they keep needing adjusting cos digging into my nose :evil: and all the other inconveniences (rain, snow, fogging up, losing them, the money spent over the years on replacements because of prescription changing, can't put make up on properly cos can't see (petty I know)).

 

I would like opinions from people who have had this done, how was it, did it hurt, what is the likely cost, and was it worth it in the end.

I have astigmatisim (sp) as well so don't know if that relevant.

Thanks in advance:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had it done (read on and you'll see why), but looked into it, and my conclusion was:

VERY expensive, not guaranteed to work, even if it does, not as permanent as you'd think, and when it goes wrong, it goes VERY wrong and can't be fixed.

 

With all that in mind, I decided to stick to my glasses, nuisance that they are an' all. :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

It costs about £400 per eye. Not everyone is suitable for it, and like bookie said, if it goes wrong, you vision in that eye goes something like trying to view the world through the bathroom window.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wore glasses for years & i had it done to both eyes with boots in regents st in london al,ost 10 years ago when it first came about, it cost me then £2,500 then for both eyes but to this day my vision has been perfect & i am now 51, if you do have it done i would go to someone like moorfields eye hospital in london as they are experts on eyes & i would not mess about trying to get the best deal moneywise, it is your eyes so do what is best for them regardless of cost !

Link to post
Share on other sites

my son has astigmatism and thought about it for a bit but his optician was really against it. said that if you go to a really high altitude your eye could explode - is this true? i've no idea. but he was so against it that my son totally went off the idea. i do know that you pay more with astigmatism than just being short or far sighted. he opted for contacts which he only wears when he goes out - wears glasses about 95% of the time. but he gets contacts for about £27 for 6 pair and those 6 pair last him about a year - as he wears them so little. it's a good compromise for him.

good luck and you are wise to look into it carefully before deciding one way or the other

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Erm what about contact lenses? Not sure if you can have them with astigmatism, cheifly because I don't know what it is. My best guess, withouth cheating and going on google, does it mean your eyes are a different shape to normal?

 

If so a friend of mine had that and still had lenses, just had to pay a little more each month. I get lenses, solutions & after care for £10 a month. Granted my prescription is fairly straight forward, touch word, but might be another option.

 

I still keep an up to date pair of glasses.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can geat contacts for astigmatism... they call them torics.

 

Unless the operation will improve your eyesight I would leave well alone. I looked into this and decided against it as I have one short sighted and one long sighted eye.

 

I get contacts afor about £14 a box and they last quite a while as I can get away with wearing one in my dodgy eye!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to glasses my mother had it done now she can not drive at night... Glasses are cool invest some money in clunky shades, I certainly get noticed more (by women) wearing sex is sex so it will work both ways, inaccessibility and all that. Glasses are the ideal solution no ifs or buts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know someone who had it done to both eyes... he had to use eye drops every 20 minutes for about 2 weeks after the op so thy must have been irritated if not painful... personaly I just couldnt stand anyone messing about when its not really necessary.

 

and you can get a damn good pair of glasses for £400 that do both eyes :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
:D well I had it done last thursday and wished i'd done it years ago. You do have to take the eye drops but they are antibiotic and anti inflammatory for a week and drops to keep them moist for a few weeks but not painful or irritated just abit dry sometimes. feels weird not wearing anything on my face tho after years of wearing specs. so for anyone who has considered it i would give it a thumbs up. :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

eyesight as good as when wearing glasses but had wavefront customvue because of the level of astigmatism and so once fully healed should actually be better than when wearing glasses. so fingers crossed. its just the weird feeling of not wearing anything on my face I need to get to grips with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was advised to have laser eye surgery by the police non the less, namely i failed the special constable medical due to not being able to see the chart much less read it.

 

all i can say is do what i did, look down the list of possible side effects and decide from that, i decided the risks were too high, but saying that both brother, father in law and a friend have had it done and there fine. although to be honest brother doesnt count he had to have it done after getting a pen stuck in his eye

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...