Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Robinson Way Cabot and Teserra???


Zippy99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4522 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am being hassled by Robinson Way - constantly at the moment.

 

It is about a £4500 debt from a Cahoot Loan - they say Abbey (who own cahoot).

 

I have made one payment to them just recently for £100 but they just keep calling saying I am late,

 

I am in default.

 

To be honest they are so rude on the phone

- I just switch off

- they bully you into making arrangements -

they won't run through income and expenditure on the phone with me

- I don't know what to do.

 

The agreement was from 2001.

I looked at my credit expert file and cannot even see this debt.

 

They also collect an egg debt of mine too

- but I have not heard from them for ages on that one

- it appears on my record 3 times

- (twice as defaulted once as satisfied) again this was from 2001

- defaulted 2005.

 

Another Cahoot debt - my over draft £800 - in default listed as cahoot

 

Another Cahoot - Credit card 2001 Agreement 2005 default - is being collected and now listed as Cabot.

 

To be honest I am so confused I came on here to get some advice and saw all this stuff about CCA etc..

 

Can anyone assist - I have Robinson way stored on my mobile so I know to hang up

- I ask them repeatedly not to call me at work

- I am a Marketing Manager

- but went through a bad period 4 years ago

- and got addicted to online gambling

- all my current credit agreements are up to date

- I simply do not know what to do with these vultures who keep pestering me.

 

I would happily pay back the money if they did not talk to me like crap and did not bully - but they are rude.

 

Any ideas on how I can get out of this mess?

 

Regards

 

Zippy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Cahoot one has been marked satisfied, then it's just that satisfied meaning it has been paid off. It looks as if they have cleared the one debt off first with what you have been paying rather than run two open a/cs. As for the other a/c first send them a CCA request to see if they are entitled to collect this debt & if it's enforcable. If they fail to provide it within 12+2 days or the CCA is unenforcable you can legally withold any payment until they do. Send it recorded delivery enclosing a £1 postal order. When you get a reply, scan it & remove any identifying details and post it back here where we can have a look at it. We'll advise you from there;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account No: XXXXXXXX/Your Reference Number: XXXXXXX

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

You should also note that I will only discuss this matter in writing and should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you or any of your associates.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance. (Optional addition)

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully **Edit to suit**

 

(Print do not sign signature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Today I have received a letter from RobinsonWay:

 

Further to your request for a copy statement in respect of the above acount we enclose that document for you immediate attention.

 

We need to hear from you with your proposals for settlement of your account which is long overdue for payment, WITHIN 10 DAYS.

 

And that was it - along with all my statements ...no CCA - should I call up or send a reply letter saying that this is not what was requested ?

 

Advice please.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi - Yesyerday I received from RWay a signed copy (by me) of the CCA from Cahoot / Abbey National Cahoot Ltd ,

however it is just an agreement - there are no T&Cs (it makes reference to them being attached in the copy).

 

Should I request these now and if so

- how do I know they are providing the actual T&C's issued at the time of signing?

 

Assistance please!

 

PS: Victory to note: £3060 returned by Barclays for a financial hardship case!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't havee access to scanner (can you believe we don't even have one in our office at work!) The agreement I got appears to be a photocopy/scan onto cahoot headed paper (thier logo appears twice at top)

 

My agreement is, however, the same in contents as this one:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-1858655.html

 

The second page featured my signature dated after the T Swayer Sig.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any help on this please Cerberusalert? Robinson Way have started to start calling me again several times a day - having looked at other threads there never seems to be a conclusion for me to compare with other people who have Flexi Loan agreements.

 

Incidently - I still cannot find this on my credit record anywhere as a debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the Telephone Harrassment letter below.

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

WARNING; PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003. s127.

Telephone Number: {you’re Telephone Number}

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

Dear Sir/Madam.

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have verbally requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving call. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued telephone calls put you in breach of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interfering with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

 

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licensed solely to me, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

 

It is consequently my view that you are committing the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner may result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you may be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

Yours faithfully,

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from the £100 extorted by Robbers and Way, when was the lst payment made on this debt by you?

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will double check the last payment as I have all the statements when I get home.

 

I looked on Credit Expert today though and saw this debt was shown on my report last July - but no longer exisits on there.

 

Thanks for replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok , I have the following information:

 

The debt which RWay are chasing appears to last had a payment made (via PayPlan) in August 2005 according to the satements Rway sent me.

 

It no longer appears on credit expert/experian (was removed in the last year). However, I have found it on my Equifax report

 

According to that info they had it marked as settled in May 05 - when the balance was 4766 - a further 3 payments were made and the debt was sold for at 4637.01 - cannot be sure of exact dates as transaction date is 18th Dec yet Statement date is Sep 06

 

The thing is it is shown as settled here and not even on my other credit record and my latest letter from RW says I am 3 months behind so must pay £300 plus the next installment on £100.

 

I have entered into no agreement with them to pay this money - what should I do now.

 

And thanks for the letter post for dealing with calls - I have changed my home number recently so that saves some harrasment - just need to get them to stop calling my mobile all hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so in other words ......just ignore them?

 

I don't want to do anything that comes back to haunt me later on, but this is certainly not damaging my credit record now as it is not on there.

 

Just want to get advice on what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so in other words ......just ignore them?

 

You can certainly choose not to talk to them on the phone and if you haven't already done so, make it clear to them, in writing, that you do not wish to discuss any aspect of the supposed debt with them on the phone.

 

...I don't want to do anything that comes back to haunt me later on, but this is certainly not damaging my credit record now as it is not on there...

 

Have you requested details of your credit files from all THREE credit reference agencies? If not, then just because it doesn't show on one, it doesn't necessarily follow that it won't be showing on another. I would advise doing this sooner rather than later.

 

What you need to establish is whether or not the debt they refer to is indeed yours - if it isn't then your actions must be very different to the situation where you are sure it is your debt.

 

Presuming that this is a debt you recognise, your next steps will be to clarify that they have provided all the necessary documents relating to your CCA request and also to a full statement of account.

 

In this manner, you will hopefully be able to identify if the agreement they have is valid in terms of the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act and if they have applied charges to your account which may be challenged by a separate process.

 

I would advise you to draw up a plan of action and follow individual parts of that to establish your position.

 

Purely for example purposes....

 

A. Write to them demanding that they cease telephone calls

B. Decide if they have provided the full details you requested - if not, write again and highlight their failings, demanding the items you need.

C. Sift through the statements you have / they supply and mark all payments which have been added to your account (i.e. default / late fees etc etc)

and so on...

 

Give yourself a course of action to follow.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

 

I would advise you to draw up a plan of action and follow individual parts of that to establish your position.

 

Purely for example purposes....

 

A. Write to them demanding that they cease telephone calls

B. Decide if they have provided the full details you requested - if not, write again and highlight their failings, demanding the items you need.

C. Sift through the statements you have / they supply and mark all payments which have been added to your account (i.e. default / late fees etc etc)

and so on...

 

Give yourself a course of action to follow.

 

OK - So I have checked all three credit records

 

Experian - Does not exisit on this record

Equifax - Shows as Settled in May 2005

Call Credit - Shows as Default settled date Dec 2008 (I believe this is when RWay got it)

 

In every case though it shows as satisfied.

 

I am going to send the harrasment letter about the calls today.

 

In terms of the CCA - as per other Cahoot Flexi Loans they appear to be above board and enforceable -and from what I can see I have no charges to claim back.

 

I accept that there is a debt yes, however, I am not sure what I can do with Rway now - as they are now threatening doorstep collection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Robbers Way are now calling me 3-4 times a day, despite me even speaking to a guy the other day to say I refuse to discuss this on the phone as per my letter. He said that they had no letter and went on trying to carry on as normal with negotiating payment. I ended up hanging up stating, I have just told you I am not willing to discuss this on the phone and as you are ignoring my request I shall be ending this call.

 

They called again just 25 minutes later!!

 

We changed phone lines back in July, so all these calls are on my mobile and I have logged them down for the past 3 weeks in a book. I simply reject the calls now - I work as a Marketing Manager in an open plan office and it is not appropriate to discuss such matters. I also know that they do bully you in to agreeing payments.

 

Where do I stand now?

 

* The credit agreement is enforceable

* I have been through the statement and there are no charges.

* 1 single payment of £100 was made earlier this year after some confusion*(see below) I thought I was paying for the egg debt Prior to that last payment was in 2005.

* They have ignored my two requests for written communication

 

Should I re-send the letter recorded delievery this time or contact OFT.

 

*My biggest gripe with Rway (aside from this harrasement) is they had another debt of mine which I religiously paid money on each month and then without warning or communication they passed it on/ sold it to another company Tessera who have registered the debt on my record but never ever contacted me (my Egg credit card does well - it now has three entries on my credit record)

 

All my dealings with them have been bad - I would not object to coming to an arrangement of some kind (as I ultimately will have to) but they are just so rude and unprofessional I cannot stand dealing with them.

 

Help would be appreciated on my next steps - I have got to the stage now where just recently I have even answered a couple of calls and shouted 'WHAT PART OF DO NOT CONTACT ME BY TELEPHONE DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND' before hanging up - I know it is not the correct thing to do, but I simply cannot stand them calling calling calling

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please help - I need advice on what to do - Rway persist in calling me 3-4 times a day.

 

I just answered and explained I was not prepared to discuss this on the phone as per previous conversations and letters and he hung up on me!

 

I have receieved a letter now from a Solicitor regarding this debt (they are based at the same address)

 

Sadly because I have made a payment and the CCA is enforceable I am going to have to pay, however, I desparately need some help on how to deal with these bullies. I was inspired to take action against them through CAG and now feel rather stuck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank- you Caggers for the support on this one.....

 

Am now sat in my office in tears after yet another Robinson Way call who now say they are calling on behalf of their client such and such solicitors.

 

They deny recieving any of my letters or my verbal requests to stop calling me during work hours and I was told on the phone that as I do work it is in my interest to make an agrement with them as they will get an attachment to earnings.

 

I was given hope by this site that I could stop the bullying, I have posted 3 times this month and not recieved any reply to help me

 

I feel completely abandoned - I tried to make a stand and am now left hanging - I don't know what to do...

 

Should I just agree a payment plan with them and be done with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds as if you accept that the debt is valid and that you want to clear it by making an arrangement with them.

 

If you are going to do this, you need to prepare a personal budget if you have not already done so and decide what you can afford to pay each month. In doing so you should make adequate allowance for your living costs and any priority debts (rent, mortgage, council tax etc). In essence you need to make sure that you can afford what you offer. This is as much as a court would order you to pay.

 

Make your offer in writing to RWay and state that this is the maximum amount you can afford. Tell them that you will make this payment by standing order (don't pay them using a debit card, credit card or direct debit). Also ask them for a written response and don't discuss it with them over the phone.

 

You appear to be getting quite upset about the telephone calls and you are letting them know it. All that is doing is to make them keep on calling. Their intention is to scare you, bully you and **** you off. If you continue to answer their calls they will only ring you more often because they know that it upsets you. Presuming that they ring and ask you to confirm your identity, all you have to do is to refuse to answer their security questions. If even that annoys you either press the red button on your mobile if they call you on that or put down the phone on them if they call on your landline. They may, in the first instance call you more often but they will soon give up and move onto their next victim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2u7t9g1.gif

 

Make a complaint to your local trading standards & the OFT with regards to their harassment and threats, they are in clear breach of OFT guidelines & CPUT ;

 

Consumer Direct - Contact us

 

OFT Complaint form

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/DebtCollectionComplaintForm.DOC

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

 

[email protected]

 

 

tel: 020 7211 5823

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices

 

http://oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I cannot believe that I wrote this over a year ago.

 

I have now not spoken to Robinson Way or made any kind of payment for well over a year. I have had an odd letter every month or so and perhaps get a call once or twice a month (certainly not the 6 times a day it once was).

 

Their collection of telephone numbers are stored in my phone and have a ringtone set to silent so I am not even disturbed by them.

 

I do wonder though - at what stage will they 'give in' Having purchased the debt in Dec 2008 - they only ever got £100 from me in May 2009 - surely you would think they would have taken action by now? It does seem like hollow threats if they never take any further action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...