Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a 'witness' to it not arriving till the 15th is sadly immaterial too. regardless to the above anyway, the PCN remains valid. 
    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MP-Sexpenses-grrr


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5412 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd give him a hand:

 

Obtain super strong hairgel.

Obtain MP and, using hair gel, form a Spikey style hairdo on him. Allow to settle.

Obtain some rope.

Obtain a large pole.

Tie MP to pole using rope. Ensure MP's head is at the end away from you.

Use as though one would a toilet brush.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that reminds me I must get someone in to clean the chandelier, put new light bulbs in, repair my tennis court, overhaul the sit on mower, refurbish my house and remember to wake me up before I go to work and stop this dreaming!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now come on, be fair. These MPs do a great job running the country and economy. They are hard working and honest.They deserve to eat in the finest restuarants, sleep in the plushest hotels and watch porn all at our expense, somebody should stand up for them and make the whole country realise this and.................."Mr Brown, Mr Brown""wakey, wakey Mr Brown, Time to put on your make up and face the public"

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Fuzzy bobble in the making.

Edited by The GodMother

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think chopping off their heads and leaving them on public display by the Tower of London is a good idea...

 

However they will probably let some resign by taking ownership of the old rotten boroughs, Chiltern Hundreds comes to mind here.

 

Pity we can't all have moats and dump the doorstep collectors in them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MPs expenses: there are honest politicians after all - Telegraph

 

There are a few MP's not taking cos they can(incl. David Howarth(LibDem), Cambridge---see above)

Kelvin Hopkins(Lab), Luton North

Martin Salter(Lab), Reading West

Adam Afriyie(Con) Windsor

Geoffrey Robinson(Lab) Coventry West

Philip Dunne(Con) Ludlow

Ed Miliband(Lab) Doncaster North

Teresa May(Con) Maidenhead

Anne Widdecombe(Con) Maidstone and the Weald.

 

Not all of them are dodgy but so far less than a dozen seem to be ok. There are over 600 MP's.

Wonder who's next for stoning in The Telegraph ;)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so angry about all this, I don't know were to start.

 

Oh, I've been caught, it must be an accounting error !!

 

Error be dammed, if you and I were caught fiddling benefits, we would be fined, have our money stopped and probably thrown in the clink. What goes around should come around to these pathetic parasites

 

:mad: :mad: :mad:

 

>

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Fraud Squad will get involved. This is blatant fiddling.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just wondering how many years this has been going on.But for the Freedom of Information act, MPs would never have been required to itemise what they had spent taxpayers money on.A third MP, the Tory backbencher Anthony Steen, claimed tens of thousands of pounds for his country mansion, including expenses for looking after 500 trees.500 trees-my local park hasnt that many.Hope his no doubt got one 4 poster bed gets woodworm and collapses with him in it. At about the era of Cromwell, a man of the people with a company of pikemen would have ridden in and stormed this nest of rats, some of whom would have had their heads stuck on a spike. Now, however, we are a democracy, which means we are completely at the mercy of shameless yobs at every level of our lives. Let’s make the Euro poll a referendum on the outrageous antics of the three main parties who misgovern us, and elect some anti-European Union parties to the Strasbourg and Brussels chambers so the lavish gravy train expenses claimed by Euro MPs can also be exposed, and the EU parliament held to account, too.Euro MPs expenses-now that would be interesting.Winston Churchill quoted:

 

I was only the servant of my country and had I, at any moment, failed to express her unflinching resolve to fight and conquer, I should at once have been rightly cast aside.

 

Well everyone now its time to cast these cheats yes cheats aside for dragging the whole foundation and history of British Politics into the GUTTER.To my mind, the big question now is what are our Euro MPs claiming? Should this not be revealed also? In 2007, our government ploughed £9billion of our money into the EU and received only £4.3billion back. Is that value for money? I do not think so. How much of this was paid in MEPs' expense claims? Is this why the EU accounts have not been audited for the past 14 years?

817-grey.gifhttp://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/0516/1224246700653.html?via=rel

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just wondering how many years this has been going on.But for the Freedom of Information act, MPs would never have been required to itemise what they had spent taxpayers money on.

 

As I understand it, it started in the 80s when in another recession the MP's took a pay freeze to show the people they were feeling it too. The expenses thing was brought in to 'make good' the deficit and help them though the hard times. Most of those MP's have long gone and the next 'intake' have just taken it for granted and us for a ride :mad:

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK Parliament - Members' allowances

The first link is one to what is called "The Green Book" and it has the one for 2006 and 2009. This is what is called the "defence" that some MP's are hiding behind.

Might be worth looking at page 4, 1.1

 

"Members of Parliament are provided with financial support in

the form of allowances to enable them to work effectively in

Parliament and in their constituencies.

Parliamentary allowances are designed to ensure that Members

are reimbursed for costs properly incurred in the performance of

their duties. They provide support for:

employing staff (Staffing Expenditure)

provision of facilities, equipment and supplies for themselves

and their staff (Administrative and Office Expenditure)

overnight stays away from home whilst on parliamentary

duties (Personal Additional Accommodation Expenditure)

communicating with constituents (Communications

Expenditure)

House stationery and postage (Stationery and Postage)

travel – between Westminster, the constituency and main

home (Travel expenditure)"

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add further to the post, page 6 and 7 are absolutely damning to any such defence that any MP is providing.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like -a bit like benefit fraud a case of once youre doing it you get used to it-accept youre doing it-then brain finally says its ok and just treats it as your right to have.Probably a simplistic look at it.But we would get locked up.For a lot less.20 Years fiddling poss-def would be locked up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The more you read the green book for MP's the more you see how damning it is. The mortgage claims specifically is fraud. You can't blame anyone else because you are specifically at fault if you submit a claim. In most work places, even if it isn't criminal on expenses, it is SACKABLE.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...