Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DCA Failing to Comply with DPA rules - help needed!


dolly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6467 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am dealing with Scotcall over a number of closed accounts...the reason being is that I want to know who they were so that I can claim charges back. (Also some accounts have never been paid off by them even though they were full and final settlements, but that is too long to go into!) These accounts have been closed 2 years and I have sent 3 DPA request letters now, each getting stroppier but they reply to me in the same way every damn time.

 

Basically they have admitted in writing that there are 9 dormant accounts but will not give me details unless I send £10 PER Account. I have quoted DPA regulations to them three times now but this most recent letter says:

 

"In order to suply information held by Scotcall in relation to dormant accounts, as advised in our correspondence of 10th July, we will be happy to supply details upon receipt of £10 per account as per DPA guidelines.'

 

They have cashed the £10 I sent them originally and send me a printout of some supposed account with a balance of - wait for this - 1p.

 

As this has gone past the 40 days now, would you just suggest I file a claim for non-disclosure? They won't give me anything at all. I do believe that there is an underlying problem with the money I paid in that one of the accounts has not been paid off, and two more have not been paid in full, leaving a difference of about £1300 to what I paid and what they allocated to creditors.

 

Any advice at all, please?

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dolly, this is a tricky one.

 

Spoke to Information Commissioners Office who said that if Scotcall are the data controller then they must release the info for £10. However, if they are merely the data processor, then they are entitled to ask for £10 for each account.

 

So, if Scotcall have all the original records from the original lender(s) they must release that info to you for £10.

Where they have sparse information and have to apply to the original lender(s) for the info, they can charge you £10 for each case.

 

Obviously, Scotcall are not going to tell you which is which, or divulge any info until you cough up! Unless you have any details of the old accounts to enable you to DPA the original lenders direct, I think you have no option but to pay Scotcall. If you knew all nine lenders names and account details the result would be the same, because you would send each of them £10 with your DPA request.

 

You should be able to tell, from the info that Scotcall eventually send you, if they possessed it or had to obtain it. Then you might report them or ask for your money back if they were telling porkies.

 

There is the consolation that, if you are able to reclaim unlawful charges as a result, you can add that cost to your claims.

 

Someone else might have a different opinion, though!:)

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ouch - it is a tricky one.

 

However, I made payments to Scotcall for 2 years on a monthly basis so surely they should send me details of the financial transactions that took place as they would have them for their records?

 

They definitely have screen records of the old accounts as, in a previous conversation before this happened, they were able to tell me when last payments were made etc.

 

As far as I am aware they never purchased the debts, just managed them. My Tesco Visa (one that is in dispute as I paid agreed settlement figure and yet it never all made it's way to Tesco) shows payments from Scotcall to Tesco on a monthly basis, albeit less than half of what I paid them each month.

 

Reluctant to pay them £10 per account as all I got was a screen printout from the cheque that they cashed...no transaction history, just a start balance and this end balance of 1p.

 

Thanks :)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would send the £10 for each of the accounts just to get the information. once you have sent it then they will have the 40 time limit.

 

if they still do not respond, contact me again and i will provide you with an Application for Disclosure which is a legal document that will force them to comply. It costs £65 to issue at court but this is recoverable and you would be entitled to claim for the cost of your time in preparing the Application (no guarantee a judge would award you your costs but a chance that they will). A solicitor friend of mine is drafting the documents for me tomorrow as Natwest received my request 61 days ago, have banked my £10 but not sent me a thing!

Me v NatWest £1.5k settled after Disc App

Jo v Barclaycard settled after Disc App

Jo v Cap 1 settled after Disc App

Jo v Abbey Disc App sent to court

Jo v Natwest cag3 let due

Nikkii v Barclays judgement in default against Barclays

Nikkii v B’card directions returned

Nikkii v Natwest settled

Laura v Lloyds – directions & aq sent

Luke v Lloyds – AQ & directions sent to court

Mark v Halifax – settled

Liam v A&L settled

Liam v Lloyds part settled - still going

Vanya v RBOS, CAG 3 let sent

Vanya v RBOS Awaiting statements

Vanya v Virgin issue on 30/03

Carl v Natwest settled

Dean v Barclays – disc app issued

Dean v B’card – disc app issued

Dean v Cap 1 – awaiting statements

(another 5 files that won't fit) busy me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

just sticking a penny in.

 

would the copies of the the credit agreements do for now this would cost you £9, but would get you no nearer getting the bank statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to give all the data they store on you - this will at least be info of alll the accounts and who they originally were with if not the full details within those accounts - send the letter in the templates library for non compliance

 

Now this is what I thought...

 

Zooman - not 100% sure of your thinking on this one so will PM you.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

Dolly mate PM away.

 

What elsinore said in post 2 is correct they are not the data controller but data processor. DCAs only get what they need from the banks to process the claim legally and do not hold full records (this said some are just trading names of the bank but that is for a later date). I have to be honest this is the first time I have heard of someone with 9 cases with one DCA. I presume that they deal with each one separately as they most certainly are not allowed to put debts from different companies in the same pot and if they did I think we could make a case they where acting in the role of a unlicensed insolvency practitioner. And that is jail time (I doubt it would get that fair but it would teach them) anyway I most stop getting my hopes up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it helps Scotcall are a last resort doorstep debt collector who only try to collect accounts that have passed through several other collection methods and failed. Whilst they might act on behalf of a DCA, I don't believe that they themselves would actually own the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Seminole I agree,having had recent dealings with them.

Just a brief outline;

 

My original account was with RBS,who after being unsuccesfull in getting me to pay 600 quid penalty charges racked up after only 3 months sold the debt to someone who I cant remember at the mo.

3 years later I get letters from Capquest........they tell me they are collecting this debt.

After ignoring their letters they went away.

That was until I fured off letters to rbs for dpa and cca.

Suddenly Capquest appeared again !!

I then sent them a very stern letter telling them I wanted cca docs.

Low and behold they managed to get an agreement but no default notice now as I recall if they buy the debt they have to register the default again in their name ?

 

The plot thickens..........there are more twists here than a ruck and roll convention enter Scotcall............we are collecting this debt...........

I immediately sent them a lba.........and guess what ....they send me a letter saying file been returned.

Meantime I contacy Capquest.........who are Scotcall and why are you both collecting this debt.

They told me Scotcall were there agents.

 

But I told you in 3 letters already this account is in dispute I am taking RBS to court...................talk about circles ?????

 

Banks are hard work but these people ???

 

I want to use some of my settlement to take these people to court for all the threats they have made even in the face of being told that its not a lawful debt.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

Martin I'm lost.

 

RBS where the bank but capquest brought the debt.

 

You are suing RBS for your money then paying capquests debt with the winnings?

 

or are you suing capquest?

 

or are you suing both as joint respondents?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the rbs claim for the pen charges is already filed but on mc,

 

I am proposing to sue them both later for the default issues.

Would you suggest doing a joint one for that?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never paid nor acknowledged the debt to the dca.

 

I have chosen to take the bank first as they are already settling with no defence.

 

I know I can take n the dca later with more resolve

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just spoke to IC helpline.

 

They have suggested that I put in a complaint to them and they will investigate it. As there have been financial transactions made to Scotcall and they are not providing details of those, they are not fulfilling terms of the DPA request. As they have also admitted that there are dormant accounts, and have these on their systems, again these should be disclosed. I have to provide all correspondence that they sent me and vice versa and await the outcome of their investigation. Thanks to you all...I expect this to be a long and drawn out saga!

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least you have a clear path to go down now,and of course supported by people who can do something.

 

I might send them all my Scotcall letters......they did the same with me till I sent them an lba then they quickly returned my file to Capquest

 

:rolleyes:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...