Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Picture Loans and the FSCS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You can put your claim in at any time, the sooner the better. If you receive any payment form the in the meantime it is simply a question of informing the FSCS that you have received that payment and they will adjust your payout.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

we have an individual reference number on our letters and mine (without opening myself up to any outside intervention) is a number less than 150 and website quotes that there are 600 cases under review

 

allan48

Link to post
Share on other sites

following with interest.

 

Good luck on the picture claims.

 

I wonder how many more loan companies will go down the same route to oblivion :-?

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all

 

today i received forms from FSCS to fill in regarding my claim for ppi mis-selling from picture

 

found my loan agreement with picture and will post a few points in hope you can advise me of things to point out when filling the FSCS forms in

 

 

Amount of advance £50,000

picture ppi £12,475

total amount of credit £62,475

 

monthly interest rate 0.732%

 

APR 9.1 variable

 

monthly payments of £546

 

repayment term 300 months

 

You have chosen to purchase our optional 5 year ppi with joint life cover and single accident , illness and redundancy civer for the 1st borrower

 

 

 

just a few points on the agreement , at the time of taking this consolidation loan our heads were in a total mess and i feel nothing was explained to us or the benefits , optional , how any insurance will be paid , never knew only 1 of us had the insurance for accident & redundancy , and why is it only for a 5 year period ?? surely £12,475 is a ridiculous amount for 5 years

 

any advice much appreciated as always

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still helping out PN well done:D

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

 

today i received forms from FSCS to fill in regarding my claim for ppi mis-selling from picture

 

found my loan agreement with picture and will post a few points in hope you can advise me of things to point out when filling the FSCS forms in

 

 

Amount of advance £50,000

picture ppi £12,475

total amount of credit £62,475

 

monthly interest rate 0.732%

 

 

APR 9.1 variable

 

monthly payments of £546

 

repayment term 300 months

 

You have chosen to purchase our optional 5 year ppi with joint life cover and single accident , illness and redundancy civer for the 1st borrower

 

 

 

just a few points on the agreement , at the time of taking this consolidation loan our heads were in a total mess and i feel nothing was explained to us or the benefits , optional , how any insurance will be paid , never knew only 1 of us had the insurance for accident & redundancy , and why is it only for a 5 year period ?? surely £12,475 is a ridiculous amount for 5 years

 

any advice much appreciated as always

 

Everything you have put down in your post is a reason for mis selling, especially not told it was optional and the 5 year bit, but put it all in.

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement is a multi agreement and the calculations for PPI should have been shown separately. As they weren't, you didn't know how expensive the PPI was. You were not told of the medical conditions that were excluded from making a claim. You were not told that Picture were not selling insurance in their own right but were receiving a commission for selling it on behalf of other companies. If you had know that you would have known it was in Picture's interest to sell the insurance, not yours. If you are like my friend, she didn't get her insurance documents until AFTER the loan had been paid out. That's enough to get you your refund -Ha!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again , thanks for the help

 

ive sent the completed forms back to the fscs along with the loan agreement showing the above information

 

do i have to work out what i am entitled to or this done on my behalf ??

 

any ideas from the above info to what id be entitled to or is each case different ?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be worked out by Deloitte, the adminstrators who are dealing with the claim and are the administrators for winding up Picture. They are international accountants and your claim will be passed to them by FSCS. You get the first £2000 and 90%of the rest from FSCS. I don't know how it will be paid but my feeling is they will reduce the loan by the insurancee premium and you will get the premiums you have already paid in your hand. The idea is to put you back in the position you were in before the PPI was mis-sold to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all just to let you know that Deloitte has been requesting information from Picture/ Target in relation to our claims. Picture is taking about 1 week to send back information on 50 claims.

A few of us have had the information returned to Deloittes and have claim handlers working on our claims now. Thay then get passed to the FSCS to see if they are eligible for compensation.

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...