Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
    • Still have to submit a statement either system....if they fail they can only give verbal because they failed to file and serve.
    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclycard, Barclays joint bank, Barclays mortgage?


catuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I recieved a letter from Calders beginning of January, same as most folk I expect. Then a few days ago my phone started ringing; I've substituted a fake name for myself naturally. I answer the phone and the conversation went like this:-

 

Calders: "John Jenkins?"

Me: "Who?"

Calders: "John?"

Me: "Who's John?"

Calders: "Is that John?"

Me: "Who are you?"

Calders: "John Jenkins?"

Me: "Who's that, I dont know any John Jenkins and who are you?"

Calders: "This is Calders Financial"

Me: "You got the wrong number m8"

 

Man from Calders put the phone down.

 

Calders.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Cat.

 

Just the usual stuff from Calders aka Mercers aka Barclaycard.

 

Did you send off, and get a response to, your SAR ?

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cat.

 

Just the usual stuff from Calders aka Mercers aka Barclaycard.

 

Did you send off, and get a response to, your SAR ?

 

:)

 

Hi Slick, I did send off for my SAR and recieved it. A lot of computer printouts:eek:! There are only a handful of charges so I'm in two minds what to do about them yet.

 

Thanks, Cat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many charges and how far back do they go.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref my recieved SAR request.

 

slick132, could you or somebody please help me with a suitable letter to send to BC requesting data relating to each penalty charge detailing the date and amount as the only info about charges in my SAR are very minimal in that they dont itemise any dates.

 

Thanks, catuk

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mitch, I didn't recieve any CCA with my SAR; the only bit pretaining to be a CCA from BC I had was in the beginning of the whole process and that was the usual T&Cs.

I'm just about to send off a letter regarding the charges, as in the SAR the info provided was minimilistic at best (no specified transactions/dates).

 

The SAR was a lot of computer printouts with a lot of data but more importantly didn't show day to day/month to month transactions as in the statements you get once a month for your BCard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The credit agreement will not be provided in response to a SAR, which is a demand for data which is held, and not documents.

 

If you press the point, the bank may confirm the data which is on the agreement, but not provide a copy of it.

 

If you want sight of the credit agreement, you must start with the CCA request and move on from there.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slick,

Done all that as stated in my thread just looking for a way to force these guys to provide the information we require.

Seen in other threads that involvement from FOS seems to get results may draft up letter stating to BC that getting FOS involved pushes them to provide some sort of response why can't they just provide what is asked for without getting them involved. Simples !!!!

Cheers Mitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mitch,

 

I'll deal with this on your thread to avoid hijacking Cat's thread further.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Cat,

 

Have you had a default notice on this a/c.

 

Any joy yet in getting the a/c data in response to your SAR.

 

Ignore Calders and their Snot-o-Gram. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi cat,

 

Have you had a full response to your SAR yet.

 

If not, this would be sufficient to consider the a/c to be In Dispute and you could send the latest DCA the "Bemused" letter.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Slick, I had the default notice from Mercers earlier in my thread here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclaycard/197756-barclycard-barclays-joint-bank-3.html

 

This is what I just had from Debt Managers who are the 4th and latest DCA to hound me. I've already sent Debt Managers ( and the other DCAs) the account in dispute letter.

 

DebtManagersFinalDemand-Copy.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt Managers are regulars on the Barclaycard list and as you can see a lot MAY happen. :)

 

DD

 

Hi DD, should I send Debt Managers any other letters or sit tight and see what comes next?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CatUK

 

I noticed that you questioned who Calders were earlier, take a look at the tiny print at the bottom of their letter. They are part of Mercers who in turn are part of Barclaycard. They just pass the details across the gangways desk to desk in the thuggery unit based in Liverpool. However whilst all this is going on they may use several others including Power2Contact, Resolvecall, Scotcall, Credit Solutions (another desk in Barclaysharks thuggery unit), Moorcroft and of course you have seen Debt Managers. None of them really like you knowing anything about the Law but all can be seen off with a little perseverance and digging your heels in.

 

However the Default Notice you have received from Mercers will be defective in a number of ways, it won't have the full name and address of the original creditor on it, it probably will not have given you the statutory requiremnt in terms of clear days to remedy the default and of course the figures will be wrong because they will contain unlawful charges and the Law requires those figures to be absolutely correct. Now you have the formal demand from Calders, does this demand the full outstanding balance on the alleged account? If it does then this can be treated as unlawful recission on the back of a defective DN. There is a weight of opinion on this forum that this termination should be accepted in writing. At this point the OC can only ever claim the correct amount of arrears at the time of termination NOT the full outstanding balance. Plus this will also leave them open to a claim for damages for the unlawful recission of the alleged account as per the Koprahor case. There is a very good but complex thread on Invalid Default Notices in the Debt Collection Forum. Its certainly worth a read.

 

regards

oilyrag.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CatUK

 

I noticed that you questioned who Calders were earlier, take a look at the tiny print at the bottom of their letter. They are part of Mercers who in turn are part of Barclaycard. They just pass the details across the gangways desk to desk in the thuggery unit based in Liverpool. However whilst all this is going on they may use several others including Power2Contact, Resolvecall, Scotcall, Credit Solutions (another desk in Barclaysharks thuggery unit), Moorcroft and of course you have seen Debt Managers. None of them really like you knowing anything about the Law but all can be seen off with a little perseverance and digging your heels in.

 

However the Default Notice you have received from Mercers will be defective in a number of ways, it won't have the full name and address of the original creditor on it, it probably will not have given you the statutory requiremnt in terms of clear days to remedy the default and of course the figures will be wrong because they will contain unlawful charges and the Law requires those figures to be absolutely correct. Now you have the formal demand from Calders, does this demand the full outstanding balance on the alleged account? If it does then this can be treated as unlawful recission on the back of a defective DN. There is a weight of opinion on this forum that this termination should be accepted in writing. At this point the OC can only ever claim the correct amount of arrears at the time of termination NOT the full outstanding balance. Plus this will also leave them open to a claim for damages for the unlawful recission of the alleged account as per the Koprahor case. There is a very good but complex thread on Invalid Default Notices in the Debt Collection Forum. Its certainly worth a read.

 

regards

oilyrag.:)

 

Hi oilyrag, the figures on the Mercer DN are different to the Calder Financial "Formal Demand for Payment" and the Calder one states:-

 

"As you have not complied with the recent Default Notice, the outstanding balance as shown above is now due in full and we demand that you pay us this ammount immediately. Your balance will continue to acrue interest at the current rate until we recieve this payment. We will no longer send statements to you."

 

I had a letter from Debt Managers today of which I'm not sure how to take it; any thoughts guys/girls?

 

DebtManagersLtdclosedfile-Copy.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...