Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5460 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Yet another cowboy letting agent...

 

Rented a house July 2006 with £2000 deposit, no TDS (as before April 2007) - LA holds deposit as stakeholder.

 

Left house 4 months ago, in good condition. LA won't respond re deposit. Has said 2 months ago that "work required" but no details and no word since then. LA not ARLA registered.

 

All patience now gone but don't know who to sue: the LA or the LL. Can you advise? The LL, btw, lives abroad but has full agency service with LA.

 

Many thanks

LA

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think the landlord should be the one who should be sued aspresumably the agent is following their clients instruction. The issue of course, will be service of any papers.

 

I suggest that you contact the court to see if you can serve the papers to the agents office.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...