Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BOS/Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OH has been making token payments £1.00 to Halifax for 6 months, CAB sent I&E originally. DN was received in February I believe the dates are out, DN was dated 18th February, areas to be paid before 4 March, I make that only 13 days. Didn't keep the envelope so not sure if it was 1st or 2nd class:evil:

 

He has now received a letter from Blair Oliver & Scott requesting full amount. Can someone tell me are BOS in-house collectors for Halifax? Is it likely that the agreement has been cancelled or not?

 

We are sending a letter to BOS, as ideally we want to carry on the token payments. Are BOS likely to freeze the interest and charges (Halifax did but have noticed on this months statement they have added them on). In the letter to OH they have mentioned door-to-door collectors, so in our response we have politely requested that due to OH health condition, which they should already know about as Halifax have all the details, that they should not send any. Haven't used the brilliant template letter on here yet, thought we'd go in slowly slowly.

 

Is it likely that Halifax would have cancelled the agreement, as OH has not received any letter from them saying they have done. In BOS letter they say they are acting on behalf of their client, so is it likely that they haven't. Not really sure how to play this:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

OH has been making token payments £1.00 to Halifax for 6 months, CAB sent I&E originally. DN was received in February I believe the dates are out, DN was dated 18th February, areas to be paid before 4 March, I make that only 13 days. Didn't keep the envelope so not sure if it was 1st or 2nd class:evil:

 

He has now received a letter from Blair Oliver & Scott requesting full amount. Can someone tell me are BOS in-house collectors for Halifax? Is it likely that the agreement has been cancelled or not?

 

We are sending a letter to BOS, as ideally we want to carry on the token payments. Are BOS likely to freeze the interest and charges (Halifax did but have noticed on this months statement they have added them on). In the letter to OH they have mentioned door-to-door collectors, so in our response we have politely requested that due to OH health condition, which they should already know about as Halifax have all the details, that they should not send any. Haven't used the brilliant template letter on here yet, thought we'd go in slowly slowly.

 

Is it likely that Halifax would have cancelled the agreement, as OH has not received any letter from them saying they have done. In BOS letter they say they are acting on behalf of their client, so is it likely that they haven't. Not really sure how to play this:?

 

Hi joemay,

 

Blair Oliver and Scott are the in-house debt collectors for Halifax/BoS. This is standard tactics for them - trying to get blood out of a stone.

 

Personally, I would send the CCA request and then see what happens. Don't let them frighten you - you can't pay what you don't have. They know this and try to put the frighteners on but believe me, they wouldn't want this to go anywhere near a court.

 

Don't correspond with them in any way other than in writing. If they ring, just tell them that you don't want to discuss it.

 

It might not seem like it, but you are in control of this so don't be worried by anything.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred, Thanks for the quick response.:)

 

Do you think we should just set up the standing order of £1.00, OH doesn't want it to appear that he's not willing to pay. I know if they come back saying they can't locate the CCA then he can stop paying as the account would then be in dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred, Thanks for the quick response.:)

 

Do you think we should just set up the standing order of £1.00, OH doesn't want it to appear that he's not willing to pay. I know if they come back saying they can't locate the CCA then he can stop paying as the account would then be in dispute.

 

Hi joemay,

 

In the very unlikely event that they should ever take you to court, the fact that you have been paying them will go in your favour, so for the time being, I would pay them. After that, you should wait and see what their response is.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses. I will send the cca, I assume it should go to BOS, if not please let me know.

 

One thing that does bother us is the fact that Halifax have now started adding interest, after they had agreed to freeze interest and charges, unfortunately the balance is currently over £12,000 so the interest being added is over £200 this month alone:eek:, it would take us 20 months to just pay of one months interest, it's madness Is there anything I can do to get them to freeze the interest again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses. I will send the cca, I assume it should go to BOS, if not please let me know.

 

One thing that does bother us is the fact that Halifax have now started adding interest, after they had agreed to freeze interest and charges, unfortunately the balance is currently over £12,000 so the interest being added is over £200 this month alone:eek:, it would take us 20 months to just pay of one months interest, it's madness Is there anything I can do to get them to freeze the interest again.

 

Hi joemay,

 

Once again, this is standard Halifax tactics. There is not much you can do about the interest at the moment. Just wait and see what the CCA turns up. Keep us all posted.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Fred, I'll get the CCA out on Monday - Should I send it to BOS?

 

Well technically, BoS have to respond, but in this case I would send it to the Halifax. It is probably best to send it by recorded delivery. Once you get the results, scan them up here (remove personal details and barcodes etc.), then see what the result is.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK i'll send to Halifax, once I get response I'll scan and post. Thanks again:D

 

You're welcome joemay and good luck.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

Halifax have sent a copy of OH's application form with A4 print out of current T&C's - see here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/202042-halifax-cca-enforceable.html

 

OH has mental health issues, and has started receiveing daily text messages to call Blair Oliver & Scott, I have also received the same texts addressed to him.

 

I am going to send the letter that cyberusalert has kindly posted on the other thread, but what I'm wondering is, is it worth pointing out that OH has health problems, has no property or means to settle this debt, and we have no idea when or if he will be able to work again and whether they would consider writing off the debt, (I know it's a long shot but worth a try). If anyone could assist with a paragraph to that affect, I would be grateful.

 

One other point to mention is he is paying Halifax £1 per month by standing order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your OH has mental health problems and it is possible to get a report from your GP/Consultant then write to the Halifax and ask for the debt to be written off on the gounds of medical issues.

 

I have been down the same route with Capital one for my daughter, whilst they were willing to write the debt off on receipt of a medical report they would not do it without one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that surprise and well done with getting them to write off your daughters debt.

 

OH's care worker has written a letter to them explaining his situation, so I may follow up with a letter asking them to consider writing off the debt, you never know they may go for it considering that they have only produced an application form without the prescribed terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Halifax have only sent an application form without the prescribed terms should OH just send the standard letter informing BOS that the application form is not an enforceable cca?

 

Was contemplating sending letter requesting them to write off the debt, but would that not just be playing into their hands.

 

Not sure which way to go!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have a defective DN. my advice would be to keep quiet and do not reply to any letters

 

what you WANT is a notice of termination or failing that more than one letter demanding the payment of the full balance which will amount to termination

 

once you have confirmation of termination of the account all you will owe them is the arrears that were oustanding at the time terminated(unlawfully rescinded) the agreement and they are then barred from claiming the remainder of the account!

Link to post
Share on other sites

as soon as you get ANY letter from them or their agents or solicitors demanding the FULL balance of the account then you must STOP making any payments at all

 

(the idea is that if they have terminated the agreement (which will be an unlawful rescission of the agreement by virtue of the defective DN) then you must not do or say anything that might be seen as acknowledging that the agreement still exists

 

the idea is that you ACCEPT their unlawful rescission of the contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I have a dilema - OH is a little reluctant to challenge BOS/Halifax due to his ill health, i'm happy to do all the work but he doesn't feel comfortable with it at present.

 

So here's the dilema, do I write to halifax asking them to consider writing off the debt (in excess of £11k) considering his dire financial and mental health situation (he has tried to take his life on 2 occassions) and if I do and they flately refuse, can we still challenge the agreement considering that they have only sent him an application without PTs. Obviously I will head the letter without prejudice so that if it should ever go to court they would not be able to produce it.

 

Any comments/suggestions would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I have a dilema - OH is a little reluctant to challenge BOS/Halifax due to his ill health, i'm happy to do all the work but he doesn't feel comfortable with it at present.

 

So here's the dilema, do I write to halifax asking them to consider writing off the debt (in excess of £11k) considering his dire financial and mental health situation (he has tried to take his life on 2 occassions) and if I do and they flately refuse, can we still challenge the agreement considering that they have only sent him an application without PTs. Obviously I will head the letter without prejudice so that if it should ever go to court they would not be able to produce it.

 

Any comments/suggestions would be gratefully received.

 

can u post the agreement up for us to look at without the persona; details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why couldnt I have had one of those CCa's? They managed to find mine from 21yrs ago looks nothing like yours and is valid:(

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the game is 11000 pounds.

 

so they will not give that away however as it stands they will not be able to enforce.

 

so what to do many caggers have this they will suggest that they will win in court but they would.

 

you could take them to court and may win.

 

if i may suggest you read this letter.

 

thanks to pt

 

 

Simple

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

In respect of the credit agreement you have disclosed on the XXXXXXX 2009

 

After seeking legal advice from a Consumer Credit Law specialist i can comment as follows.

 

The agreement you disclosed is improperly executed, it is not compliant primarily with s61(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the consequences are that as it stands the agreement is unenforceable and requires an order of the court pursuant to section 65(1) CCA 1974 to be remedy this problem. you are invited to make such an application for the said order.

 

Upon such an application i will rely upon the following points

 

The agreement is a fixed sum credit agreement, the rate of interest under the agreement is fixed for the term of the loan, there are no items entering into the charge for credit which are likely to be subject to change or variation therefore the agreement requires a term stating the Total Charge for credit with or without a list of its constituent parts, the agreement does not contain this term and therefore breaches Regulation 2 and Schedule 1 Para 9 Consumer Credit Agreement Regulations 1983.

 

The agreement must as a consequence of para 9, also include a term stating the total amount payable, again this agreement does not contain such information and therefore the agreement also breaches Reg 2 and Schedule 1 para 11 Consumer Credit Agreement Regulations 1983 and therefore the agreement does not comply with the regulations made by the secretary of state under the powers given by s60(1) of the 1974 Act and accordingly the agreement doesn ot comply with the strict requirements of s61(1)(a) Consumer Credit Act nor did it comply with s61(1) © Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

These breachs are clearly prejudicial to me as on entering into the agreement i was not givne the informatiuon that the Consumer Credit Act required to be made clear, i was not aware of the true cost of borrowing.

 

I would further highlight that Lloyds TSB subscribes to the Banking Code, as a requiremento f the code, they are required to lend responsibly and they clearly have failed in their duty under the code

 

my contention is that the court should not make an enforcement order, my authority for this contention would primarily be the case of Wlaker v SPPL in the Chester High Court before HHJ Derek Halbert. however if the court were minded to make an order for enforcement my argument would fall directly upon Rank Xerox Finance Limited vs Hepple CCLR 1994 1 and in this case the court taking into account a single breach of schedule 1 Agrement Regs reduced the amount of debt from £5000 to £500 to compensate the debtor for the prejudice caused

 

in view of this and in view of the fact you require an order from the court to enforce this agreement as clearly set out within the act, and the House of Lords in Wilson and First County Trust 2003 UKHL 40, i would invite your proposals to settle my dispute. i would also advise that i am informed that , i am able to apply to the court to consider this matter pursuant to section 142(1) CCA 1974 if no suitable agreement can be met.

 

however i trust this will not be necessary

 

I look forward to your settlement proposals

 

regards

have a read and see what you think

 

EDIT TO SUIT

Edited by lilly white
forgot to put link

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks lilly white, but I'm a little confused with the letter, would it still be relevant as OH's isn't a loan agreement but a Credit Card?

 

I wouldn't be confident in them writing the amount off, but you never know - what i need to know is would we be putting OH in to the sticky stuff by sending a letter asking for them to consider write off.

 

It would be great to know if anyone has asked for creditor to write debt off then after refusal, have they managed to challenge the CCA and what was the outcome.

 

I look forward to your responses as I don't want OH to end up in the sticky stuff:D

Edited by joemay
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...