Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLC/Young and Pearce claimform - old Welcome Finance credit agreement **WON DISCd**


jb000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Congratulations on getting the stay, it seems that Cattles now may not have enough money in the pot to pay the legal bods for the dodgy claims they have rushed through the system. Another one up to CAG.

 

Go for a strike out AND wasted costs (average claim for this is about £150) which will upset Welcome no end. We can help you with the strike out and wasted costs charges at £9.95 per hour, allow 10 hours legal research, post, copying, printing etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Many thanks Sillygirl1 my mind is now made up and I am going to go for it.

 

Anything I can do to annoy them would be the icing on the cake as for years I have suffered from their threats and their patronising attitude.

 

As I am new to this and this is definately unchartered territory for me, any help to get this started would be most appreciated.

 

I cannot thank all Caggers enough for their kind words and advice helping me through this and I can finally now see some light at the end of the tunnel.

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

MORE FANTASTIC NEWS!!!

 

They've given up. Claim discontinued.

 

Maybe they've been reading this and decided to cut there losses as I was thinking of going for the strike out plus costs.

 

Once again I cannot thank caggers enough especially postggj and sillygirl1 for their help.

 

Donation to CAG on it's way come payday.

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

MORE FANTASTIC NEWS!!!

 

They've given up. Claim discontinued.

 

Maybe they've been reading this and decided to cut there losses as I was thinking of going for the strike out plus costs.

 

Once again I cannot thank caggers enough especially postggj and sillygirl1 for their help.

 

Donation to CAG on it's way come payday.

 

jb000

right then

 

What track was this claim on? if it was fast track or above, or if it had not been allocated to track yet, then you are entitled to your costs and you should be able to recover quite a few hundred pounds id say

 

Congrats on the result

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim wasn't allocated a track, didn't even get AQ.

 

Welcome Finance and Young and Pearce had 28 days plus 5 for service to respond to my embarrased defence. They did'nt respond, claim was stayed and then they gave up.

 

 

 

Scanned documents as attachments.

 

jb000

wfcredit ag.jpg

wf.discon.jpg

Edited by jb000
Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations... we did tell you it wasn't as black as Welcome had painted. Go for the costs and don't forget to keep the paperwork handy, they may appoint somebody to try again and you can prove that you don't owe them a penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi, you'll all probably remember me from a thread Welcome Finance CCJ where Welcome Finance/Legal Recoveries and Collections tried to get a CCJ on me and failed. They eventually gave up.

 

Now I have another set of parasites on my back, namely Lewis Debt Recovery trying to recover this debt.

 

I am at a loss of what to do, should I tell them that this (alleged) debt has already gone to court and failed, or can they start this process all over again.

 

Any ideas would be gratefully appreciated that these according to their website boast of being large litigants. (Probably allegedly bordering on vexatious).

 

Many thanks in advance

 

jb000

Edited by jb000
Link to post
Share on other sites

Write back and tell them that on XXX date XXX tried to get a CCJ and failed, and you have absloute defence on this so it is pointless chasing.

 

Yes, tell them it has already gone to court and failed. YHou are in the same boat as me and Cap 1, they lost and are still chasing via another company.

 

These scumbags never give up do they - they need to really have their licences reviewed every THREE months rather than THREE years....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I shall write to them and send it recorded delivery on Monday.

 

I have had Roxburghe, Ruthbridge, Legal Recoveries and Collections as well chasing this debt, so these lot must be pretty low down in the food chain.

 

Do you think I should go along the lines of "Your client has tried and failed to obtain Court Action on this debt and a copy of the notice of discontinuance is available on request, and now I trust that this is the end of the matter".

 

I do think that this one is going to bounce around every ****** DCA for quite a while, so I am not going to hold my breath.

 

Thanks

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending this by recorded delivery tomorrow.

 

This letter has reference to your letter dated 15 September 2009.

 

I am somewhat surprised at your letter given the fact that your client Welcome Financial Services has already tried and failed to take this matter to Court.

 

 

Furthermore, it also further surprises me that your client Welcome Financial Services had not told you of this major development given that you are one of the same company, namely Cattles PLC.

 

 

Your client tried to obtain Judgement through Northampton County Court on 12 May 2009 via their solicitors Young and Pearce of Nottingham. I strenuously contested and defended their application for Judgement and your client along with their solicitor discontinued their action.

 

 

A copy of the notice of discontinuation is available upon request.

 

 

I would suggest you contact your client for further information and I trust that this is the end of the matter.

 

Yours faithfully

 

wonder if this is along the right lines.

 

Any comments?

 

Thanks jb000

Edited by jb000
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would amend the first qualifying sentence. Since they already took it as far as court, it doesn't quite apply the way you have written it.

 

Just being a little pedantic, but you might as well be as accurate as possible. :)

 

Thanks

 

I have amended the letter slightly, now it reads "already taken this matter through the Court System", instead of tried and failed.

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...