Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLC/Young and Pearce claimform - old Welcome Finance credit agreement **WON DISCd**


jb000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am thoroughly enjoying watching the slow and painful demise of these cowboys. I was stupid enough to buy a car from these people in 2004. I was 'sold' god knows how many insurances which were'nt worth the paper they were printed on as I was told no insurances no car. The car turned out to be a right lemon and 6 months later tried to make a claim on the mechanical insurance.

 

Insurance would not pay out, so had to get a loan from Welcome Finance to pay for the repair of THEIR car. Once again loan was stacked with PPI and other associated add ons which I said I did not want, however, again was told no insurances, no loan, I was at the mercy of these sharks.

 

About a year later, car went seriously wrong again, cue another Welcome Finance loan. This time they used part of the loan to pay the other loan off and the remainder once again to pay for THEIR property. I felt I was being conned but could do nothing about it as I needed a car for work and was tied to HP payments on a car which was barely roadworthy.

 

Some time later, car went wrong again and I said right enough was enough and told them to collect the car as they were not getting another penny out of me. They said they were not interested in the car itself, only the payments on the car and loan. By this time the car was on a public road, without MOT or insurance and broken down. I phoned them again and told them that they better collect their car as they were committing an offence for an unroadworthy vehicle to be on the public highway without insurance or MOT. I was screamed at, and I said right, the car will be scrapped this afternoon and you will not get another penny from me for either the car or the loan.

 

Got usual letters, visits etc and ignored them, changed my phone number and had just got another job so they did not have any phone or employment details for me.

 

Got letter from DLC Direct Legal and Collections with the usual threats. Requested CCA in November last year, heard nothing since.

 

I have a nice bottle of bubbly chilling nicely away in the fridge, when these cowboys are finally bust and brought to task, that cork will go pop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I wonder if anyone can help me.

 

In early November 2008 I requested a copy of the credit agreement from a loan I took out with Welcome Finance in 2005. I requested this from Direct Legal and Collections DCA in Nottingham. After nearly six months, the paperwork was finally released to me.

 

The credit agreement consists of one page with no terms or conditions attached to it. (Trying to get hold of scanner at the moment, so unforunately I cannot display it).

 

The agreement is signed, has the total loan amount, apr etc. But one thing it does not have is the total amount repayable. My question is this, do credit agreements have to display the total amount repayable under the 1974 Consumer Credit Act as part of the prescribed terms, would this make the agreement unenforcable.

 

Many thanks in advance

 

jb000

 

I am also going to go for mis sold ppi as well as I was told no ppi, no loan.

 

I have until the 7th April to contact them, otherwise Direct Legal Collections will be going for a CCJ.

 

I want to get this into dispute before they do go for court action.

 

So any advice on the failure to put the total amount repayable, the lack of their terms and conditions and the mis sold ppi would be most welcomed.

 

Thanks

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

i suggest you get this moved to & do some reading in the welcome finance forum.

 

if you cca'ed the dca, then 6mts is way to long to of waited, oh and dont worry about that ccj threat, thats all it is a threat-o-gram.

they have no legal powers.

 

get that claim in for the ppi to welcome, then the a/c will be indispute anyhow.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if anyone can help me.

 

In early November 2008 I requested a copy of the credit agreement from a loan I took out with Welcome Finance in 2005. I requested this from Direct Legal and Collections DCA in Nottingham. After nearly six months, the paperwork was finally released to me.

 

The credit agreement consists of one page with no terms or conditions attached to it. (Trying to get hold of scanner at the moment, so unforunately I cannot display it).

 

The agreement is signed, has the total loan amount, apr etc. But one thing it does not have is the total amount repayable. My question is this, do credit agreements have to display the total amount repayable under the 1974 Consumer Credit Act as part of the prescribed terms, would this make the agreement unenforcable.

 

Many thanks in advance

 

jb000

 

Hopeyfully PT2537 will pop by - I think but am not 100% sure he told another Cagger on here if there was no charge for credit agreement was null and void.

 

It is somewhere is this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-finance/109794-welcome-finance-new-post.html

 

I'm sure it was in february - apologies for not looking for it to copy and paste but this thread is very long and it would take me all day but if you have the time (and the patience) knock yourself out the answer is in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andie_303

 

Thank you so so much, you are an absolute star (scales are clicked)

 

That is exactly what I am looking for. My agreement is exactly the same as that one - albeit unsecured.

 

I will send the letter off first thing Tuesday morning recorded delivery of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order that I don't want to look like a fool and maybe thinking I am jumping the gun when I send off the letter as I am new to this, I just want to double check with you all what is on my agreement.

 

I have to type this as I have no scanner.

 

Amount used to settle existing loan 1196.83

Amount for new cash advanced 803.17

Medicare 24 150.00

Optional Payment Protection Insurance 687.41

Amount of Credit 2837.41

Acceptance Fee 75.00

Total Amount of Loan 2912.41

 

Amount of Monthly Payment 133.46

APR 45.5%

Rate of Interest 3.0% a month

Estimated Repayment Period 36 months

 

That is the only financial info displayed on credit agreement

 

Agreement signed on 07/04/2005.

 

Looking again at that other agreement mentioned earlier, it does look slightly different, so I just wanted to double check before I go in all guns blazing.

 

Many thanks

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got accepted for a loan in May 2005 with Welcome Finance.

About a year later, I hit financial difficulty and told them that I could not afford to pay the monthly payment but will negotiate a lower repayment.

 

To cut a very long story short, I was threatened with allsorts and treated like a criminal,

I just had enough and told them to go and whistle for the rest of their money.

 

Since 2007 the debt has been going around the usual debt collectors and was contacted by Direct Legal and Collections in October 2008.

 

In early November, I cca'd them, but heard nothing until late last month when they produced the CCA.

 

I had also been mis-sold ppi on the loan - was told no ppi, no loan.

 

When I looked at the CCA, certain information was missing.

 

No total charge for credit

No total amount repayable - key financial information

plus

No date set for repayment - implied term

 

I wrote to DLC and told them that the account was in dispute due to the mis-sold ppi and the credit agreement being unenforceable, plus I questioned their unlawful charges on the account.

 

Today I have received a County Court Summons from Northampton Bulk Centre via DLC and their pet solicitors Young and Pearce.

 

I fully intend to dispute this and wonder if anyone can help and advise me to get things started.

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK jb

 

First thing, acknowlede service, tick the box saying you will defend all of the claim.

 

You then need to start getting a defence together. THis will be based on the unenforceable credit agreeement (we need to check this, can you post the agreement with personal details removed). We could also do with looking at any default notice you have been sent because WF have ahabit of getting them disatrously (for them) wrong

 

At the same time, we will put in a counter claim for mis-sold PPI and unlawful charges.

 

THis is going to be fun :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Steven for your quick response.

 

Getting hold of a scanner tomorrow so I will have credit agreement displayed on this post.

 

Just found default notice so I will display this as well once scanner is up and running tomorrow.

 

Any advice when these are on display would be most welcomed.

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this dlc who have brought the n1 claim

 

they are well aware on the short commings of early welcome agreements,

present company included.

 

thats prob why they have gone for a ccj .

 

you are in good hands with stephen.

 

not meny of us on the forum like welcome very much and giving you a belated victory dance

 

enjoy the ride and give some dca bashing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang around postggj, your input will be welcome too.

 

 

Nothing here pleases me more than getting justice from WF (except perhaps doing the same to MBNA and Brighthouse :D)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have finally managed to get default notice and credit agreement scanned. As I am new to this it's taken longer than expected.

 

Thanks jb000

 

http://s635.photobucket.com/albums/uu76/jb00000/?action=view&current=wfdefault.jpg

 

wfcreditag picture by jb00000 - Photobucket

Edited by steven4064
repairing link
Link to post
Share on other sites

The DN may well be dodgy because, in the emphasised text it talks about "the date shown" but there is no date - all it says is "within 14 days" but not from when. From the date of receipt? From the date of the notice?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the default notice, is does seem strange that there is no date shown apart from the date of the default notice itself.

 

Has anyone had the chance to look at the credit agreement. It does look really amateurish and the more I look at it, the more I feel that there may be something wrong with it.

 

Any help would be gratefully appreciated.

 

jb000

Link to post
Share on other sites

its your lucky day

ive seen some bad agreements in my time.

 

let me go over each one over the weekend and ill get back to you

 

 

i thought my agreement was bad but yours

 

o happy days

 

cant comment any more until confirmation

Link to post
Share on other sites

its your lucky day

ive seen some bad agreements in my time.

 

let me go over each one over the weekend and ill get back to you

 

 

i thought my agreement was bad but yours

 

o happy days

 

cant comment any more until confirmation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the agreement is suspect in several places but I will let postggj deal with that as they are the expert here. Welcome are on dodgy ground anyway so that might go in your favour.

 

As for the default notice it stinks - and again may be a 'recent reproduction' rather than the real thing.

 

I am around until about 3pm today and on and off tomorrow to give some help here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...