Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does that mean that you haven't ever received them.

 

In that case I'll do (tomorrow - as I'm going out in a minute) a formal CPR Part 18 request

 

I'll get it posted up first thing in the morning

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

recieved a letter from honda today , no DN, no TN, no CCA, as requested on the 27th July , Just a statment of the account , but it does show a different apr to the original arrement

 

What do i have to do to get the court to request the documents from Honda ?

 

Made a cpr 18 request, and the information i got back wasn't what i requested, i requested the DN CCA TN.

 

I phoned the court complaining that they had failed to give me the required info, and they said their was nothing they could do ?

 

help please

 

Their was no cca with the claim either, and it was from uxbridge county court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you filed a defence as yet ? when is the deadline ?

 

Unfortunately you can't call the court to complain that they haven't complied, you have to put this in at defence and/or Allocation Questionnaire stage....

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was in reference to my return of goods hearing , and me panicking, but im allright now , as they had the incorrect amount on the DN, TN :D

 

Which means they been incorectly exucuted

 

Thanks guys

 

Im trying to do my defence now , i will post it when its done

 

As the claiment has failed to supply the requested document i can enter a embarresed defence ?

In the xxxxxxx County Court

 

 

Claim number: xxxxxxxx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Between

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

 

And

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx – Defendant

 

1)The Claimant’s Particulars of Claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules

2)·A copy of the purported agreement cited in the Particulars of Claim has not been served attached with the claim form and there is no statement that this is to follow – contrary to CPR – Part 16 – Rule 16.2(2).

3)·A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged account, has not been served attached with the claim form and there is no statement that this is to follow – contrary to CPR – Part 16 - Rule 16.2(2).

 

 

4)In correspondence dated 24/07/2009 sent via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery, the Claimant was asked to provide information, in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Claimant has thus far failed to supply any of the requested information or copies of documents. It is requested by the Defendant that the court, in accordance with CPR - Part 18, orders the Claimant to comply with the following request for information:

· Inspection of the original written agreement upon which the Claimant’s claim is based and/or for the original agreement to be made available in court.

· A true copy of the written agreement.

· A true copy of the default notice.

· A copy of all statements and/or transactions detailing how said claim of £XXXX.XX has been attained.

· Details of any collection charge(s) added to the account - specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge encompasses.

· Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account, a detailed breakdown of said fees and/or charges, and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees and/or charges were levied.

· A true copy of the Notice of Assignment sent by the Assignee to the Defendant in compliance with section 136 of the Law of Property Act, 1925.

· ·A copy of the assignment, giving the Claimant entitlement to the make the claim.

· A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act, 1998.

Without clarification of the Claimant’s claim, the Defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the Claimant’s claim appears without merit.

5 the Defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The Defendant is embarrassed.

6. I respectfully ask the permission of the court to amend this defence when the Claimant provides full disclosure of the requested documents

 

BELIEVE THE FACTS SET OUT IN THIS DEFENCE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ARE TRUE.

 

 

Signed: XXXXXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I think that you wil have to provide more detail

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you wil have to provide more detail

 

The agreement was for 37 months and i never returned the car ,

 

 

the judge said that being so the agreement was for 37 months the company was allowed to charge contractual interest ,

 

 

and as the agreement had been over run there was no contract

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may need to consider an appeal here, but you'll need to be sure you want to do that, sounds like the judge was a bit of a duffer

 

there should have been an executed agreement and IMHO the judge got it wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go through all your paperwork and lets see whether its worth the appeal. Concentrate on this first, your complaint can come later. It really does sound like the judge just wasnt up to speed on the law, so your arguments must get him/her to see your point. With a little work im sure youd get somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going to appeal, but im going to need help

 

Am i right in thinking that a agreement not dated or having a creditors signature prior to 2006 can not be enforced by a court

 

Im always polite :p

 

Does anyone know where i can find out in the cca, where a court cannot enforce a agreement if it doesn't have a date and creditor signature

 

Also where it states that a judge cannot use the powers of the 2007 cca on a agreement made in 2004

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive highlighted this thread, you might not get a response this weekend, but we need one of the site team to give you a good cause for appeal. Which IMHO is what youve got, youve already stated the obvious which would get your appeal going, so we just need to put it in the correct context for the appeal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...