Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I brought a car from honda in may 2004, it was a a ex show room car, and I was offered £1000 off the price of the car .

 

How ever Honda finance increased their interest rate from 11.9% to 12.9% to get the cash back from the £1000 discount from the car.

 

Also the copy of the consumer credit agreement I was given is unsigned by honda finance , so would i be correct in that its a unenforcable CCA

 

cheekyone

Edited by cheekone
missed a bit out
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You'll probably find YOU copy of the form (completed by the dealer) won't have it signed - you normally receive a photocopy from the finance house showing it has been signed.

 

I think you'll also find it was the dealership that increased the rate to manipulate the cashback, it's a common ploy but not in itself illegal. (Their commission kickback is based on the rates they agree - the greater the % the bigger their bonus).

 

What's wrong with the car? If it's just a ploy to try an get out of paying for it because you now don't like the interest rate, that's hardly playing the game, is it? You probably will take a risk in challenging it, with no real guarantee of success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right the car is a 2003 model and thats why i was given a £1000 discount , and i didn't recieve a photocopy of the cca signed by honda . They also claimed the dealer had upped the interest rate , but its their finance form not the dealers. If honda had checked the agreement before signing it, they would of been aware that the interest rate was above their rate interest and put things right.

 

Just too make this a little more interesting Honda , work out that 12.9 % apr on £17464.85 over 36 months = £5462, my calculation its £3,476.50

 

cheekyone

Edited by cheekone
updated
Link to post
Share on other sites

The dealer probably did 'up' the interest rate - but since this is not PRINTED on the contract (but written in as part of the calculations) there is no fraud on mis-selling here. It would HAVE to be 'their form- as they are providing the finance, and the dealership is their agency.

 

There is no such thing as a 'right' interest rate - so I don't know where you got this from, the rate will always be 'From...' based on the amount of the loan and the buyers ability to pay - just the same way credit card applications work. (You get sucked in on a promise of 12% then find out they're only giving you 35%, so at this stage it is agree or walk away).

 

As to your last paragraph - making a profit isn't illegal, and you'll find the dealership got a chunk of that too....

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the agreement is unsigned by them you can withdraw from it. In your case when the agreement is signed by Honda, then it is a properly executed and enforceable agreement. Why not ask them for a copy of the executed agreement and see what you get? If it is unsigned then write to them and state that you wish to withdraw from the agreement. This is in the Consumer Credit Act (although I can't remember the section off the top of my head).

 

Or you could write and withdraw now and see if they produce an executed copy (although there would be nothing to stop them signing it now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

can someone please confirm that my agreement for buying a car off honda is not enforcable.

 

The term and conditions doest't have anything about a ten day cooling off period .

 

The amount of money i borrowed was 17464.85 and the apr set at 12.9 %

Honda have worked out that £17464.85 + 12.9% = £5462

 

I have worked out that £17464.85 = 12.9% = £3,476.67

 

so is my agrrement enforcable ?

 

please help

 

cheekyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what you mean, are you saying they aledged you bought a car that you do not have, or you bought a car and now find yourself in a position where you are unable to make full payments, and want leverage to reduce your payments?

 

BTW what kind of car is it, had a couple of their bikes, the one with 6 cylinders was a beaut' and the little ones went on for ever. but I thought you had to be over 90 to get one of their cars ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I brought a car off honda , then checked their agreement , and found out that the apr was incorrect , and when challenging them about the interest charges and returning the car they said i had to pay off half the amount. Even though this was within two weeks of getting the car

Edited by cheekone
update
Link to post
Share on other sites

I see. You returned the car, but they want you to still pay half the value. How long did you keep the car before you returned it, i thought you had 30 days to cancell the agreement? If you say sent it back after a week i would have thought all they could have asked for was what it would cost to rent a similar spec car for a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

can some please tell me if the cca still applies at a return of goods hearing, and if its proved unenforcable that will be the end of it

 

cheekyone

 

Could some one please tell me if the cca still comes into effect at a return of goods hearing, and if its proved to be unenforcable , that will be the end of the matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes , I ve paid over two thirds off , and have argued with the debtor about the rate of interest since shortly after taking the agreement out, and the rate of interest is wrong .

They have also tried claiming interest on their claim even though i thought this was a abuse of process when doing so against a agreement regulated by the consumer credit agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to file a proper defence to the claim

 

When is the hearing?

 

Can you post a copy of the Particulars of the Claim, the DN and the TN and a copy of the CCA

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ll have to put the cca up tommorrow, but the interestrateworks out to 22% apr, and it states is 12.9 %, and theirs no actual interest rate

 

The particulars of the claim is as follows

 

a)The Agreement is regulated by the consumer credit agreement

b) The agreement is dated 29th may 2004

c)the place the agreement was signed is ruislip onda

d:) a default notice was served by secound class post on 31 st August 2007

e) a termination notice was served first class post on the 20th Jan 2009

f) a right to demand delivery was accured on 20th january 2009

g total amount payable £32471

 

 

h) deposit of £9404 was paid

I )total paid including deposit 21,731

m) unpaid balance including late payment , interest fees and charges £10,845.84

 

and the claiment claims

1)an order of the delivery of goods

2) the arrears of instalments totaling £10,845.84

3) contractual interest at the rate of 6.5 % on the sum of £10,845, from the £20th Jan 2009 to the date herein totalling £333.89 and continuing until judgement or sooner payment and at a daily rate £1.93

4) the cost of this action

 

Sorry not sure what a DN and TN are

Edited by cheekone
Link to post
Share on other sites

I ll have to put the cca up tommorrow, but the interestrateworks out to 22% apr, and it states is 12.9 %, and theirs no actual interest rate

 

The particulars of the claim is as follows

 

a)The Agreement is regulated by the consumer credit agreement

b) The agreement is dated 29th may 2004

c)the place the agreement was signed is ruislip honda

d:) a default notice was served by secound class post on 31 st August 2007 - That's the DN

e) a termination notice was served first class post on the 20th Jan 2009 - That's the TN

f) a right to demand delivery was accured on 20th january 2009

g total amount payable £32471

 

 

h) deposit of £9404 was paid

I )total paid including deposit 21,731

m) unpaid balance including late payment , interest fees and charges £10,845.84

 

and the claiment claims

1)an order of the delivery of goods

2) the arrears of instalments totaling £10,845.84

3) contractual interest at the rate of 6.5 % on the sum of £10,845, from the £20th Jan 2009 to the date herein totalling £333.89 and continuing until judgement or sooner payment and at a daily rate £1.93

4) the cost of this action

 

Sorry not sure what a DN and TN are

 

I've made a couple of comments - I need to see the DN and the TN

 

When is the hearing?

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

The hearing is the 27th of August

 

I shall see if i can find the termination notice

 

ruislip hnonda is actually thames h onda, and not the creditor , who signed the agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you've posted the info I'll see if I can help you draft a defence. Can you pm me when you've posted the DN, the TN and the CCA

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically they should have served a copy of it with the claim form - but if you've got the original from 2004 that's fine

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post the DN, TN and CCA

 

Can you post the Default Notice and the Termination Notice

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...