Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unsigned Credit Card Agreements


cvpms
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have two credit cards one with Capital One with a £4000.00 limit currently with a balance owed of £1990.00 approx. I opened this account on 22/12/2005 (applied online).

Also I have a Virgin Credit card also applied online with a £6000.00 limit and a balance of about £5400.00 this was openened 27/2/2008

I have drafted letters to both which I will be posting soon however I was just wondering if someone could help guide me through the process of finding out if the agreements are enforcebable.

As my Capital one is an older card im assuming that there is a chance that it may not comply with the CCA and therefore be uneforcable. Just wondering if anyone has any experience with these credit card companies and agreements.

I was also considering transfering my balance from my Virgin Card to Capital one however I was wondering if requesting a copy of the signed agreement will have any implications on my ablility to do so.

If anyone has any usefull information and guidence it would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are entitled to request copies of your CCA's at anytime and as it is your right, they cannot (and will not)hold it against you. This thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/105315-my-agreement-enforceable-useful.html gives lots of information as to whether an agreement is enforceable or not. The chances are that the Virgin card will be enforceable as it is an online agreement. However, Capital One may be a different story.

 

Once you receive the "agreements", scan and post them on here (omitting all personal details) and someone will be able to tell you for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for your reply. I also applied for my Capital one Card online in 2005 is it still likely to be uneforceable given I applied on this way? I cant rememeber wether or not I was posted an agreement to sign after applying or if I it it was just a tick box to say I agree to all the terms etc. (As good as a signiture). I was also considering applying for disclosure via a court as it seems a lot of people get sent blank copies not the signed document. Also that its hard to get them to say if they have a copy of the agreement. The way I understand it if they cant produce a signed copy of the agreement then its as good as never existsing at all and therefore uneforceable is this correct?

 

Also if I go for disclosure can they make a counter claim? I dont want to run the risk of a CCJ againt me but I cant see how that would be reasonble if your just checking even if it is by order of the court. And it would definately stop them beating round the bush with the blank forms etc. Ive seen letters somewhere in the forum with letters stating that it is infact the signed copy of the agreement that is required specifically and also for them to state if they do or do not hold a copy I dont suppose you have a link to a draft similar to this? I just know what I will get in the post and it wont be what Im asking for. (the signed agreement)

 

Also if they have a signed agreement if this isnt set out as per the regulations does this mean it will be unenforcable regardless as to whether it is signed or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, cvpms.

 

I'll move this thread to a Forum where you should get more help.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about the Virgin but 2008 you would have ticked a box for the signature. Also I think the agreements were updated somewhat. Best waiting for someone with more knowledge on that.

 

As for Cap one, I have a card with them, took out the same time approx and I did sign for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the starting point is to request the two CCA's - once you've got those you can post them and we can have a look to check enforceability.

 

1. The 2005 agreement - if it doesn't contain the prescribed terms (Credit limit, repayments, Interest rate) and/or you haven't signed it - then its' going to be unenforceable

2. The 2008 agreement - if it doesn't contain the prescribed terms and/or you haven't signed it - then it is only enforceable with a court order

 

The law on enforceability changed as of 2006.

 

But as I've already mentioned you need to get copies of the CCA's

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, cvpms.

 

Regarding the online agreement.

 

As The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Electronic Communications) Order 2004 came into force in December 2004 any online agreements entered into prior to this date still need a signed executed credit agreement.

Electronic signatures weren't considered valid until this date.

 

 

 

Also it would still have to contain all of the prescribed terms to be valid.

 

What are the prescribed terms

 

S61(1)(a) CCA provides that, for a regulated agreement to be properly executed, it must contain all the prescribed terms of the agreement and conform to regulations under s60(1)

 

Reg 6(1) provides that the terms specified in Sch 6 to the Agreements Regulations are ‘prescribed terms’ for the purposes of s61(1)(a) and s127(3)

 

8.2 What if prescribed terms are missing or incorrect?

 

s127(3) provides that the court may not make an enforcement order unless a document containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor

 

If therefore any of the prescribed terms is missing, or incorrect, the agreement is not enforceable against the debtor, and the court is precluded from making an enforcement order.

 

 

8.3 What are the prescribed terms?

 

The prescribed terms specified in Sch 6 are as follows:

 

* amount of credit

 

* credit limit

* repayments

* rate of interest

 

Sch 6 was not amended by the 2004 Regulations

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...