Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Response from barclaycard Re cca Request


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I received the below response from Barclaycard yesterday

 

Dear Mrs ...........

 

Account number xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I write further to your letter and enclosed £1 fee requesting a copy of your executed agreement for the above account.

Please find the following documents enclosed.

1. A copy of your original Barclaycard terms and Conditions at the time you opened your account

2. The current Credit limit on your account

3. The current Balance on your account

4. The next minimum payment

5. please note a copy of your current Barclaycard agreement will be sent under seperate cover

The information we must provide to you under the terms of section 78 is prescribed by the consumer credit act 1974 and by the consumer credit (cancellation notices and copies of documents) regs 1983

You will be receiving your next statmenet shortly

This complets our obligation under section 78 of the consumer credit act 1974

I would really appreciate any advice or help on what to do next. I have read and reread the forums and i am guessing they dont have my original agreement? thus the comment on sending me my current one? But i am a little unsure

 

Could anyone please advice me on my next step

 

Thank you so much for your help

 

Montague

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your prompt response

 

Am i correct in thinking they need to send me an original agreement with my signature on?

 

In addition do you mind me asking what action you have now taken if they have not sent you your cca request.

 

Not sure if to write again or stop payments?

 

Again any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an account in dispute letter here somewhere which you can send them and if it has been 12+2 days since u sent the agreement and they have not acknoledged your request then stop making payments and send them the letter.... if you have requested your original agreement then yes the have to send you the actual agreement which you signed at the time of applying for credit.

 

As mentioned before, although I requested the CCA a while ago, this was for a completely different purpose then to CCA requests regarding enforceability of an agreement. Therefore, I have requested again, and if they do not produce a copy of my signed agreement then I shall too be sending them an account in dispute letter and stoping all payments to them. However, as a gesture of goodwill I shall be offering them 10% of my balance on the basis they remove any adverse data from my credit files and mark as satisifed....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all, just reading your threads in the hope of gaining info I can, but I may be able to pass on my experiences so far. My husband and I both have Barclaycards, we are a little ahead of you I think, sent CCA letters to both, response was only to send T & c's back nothing signed. Account in dispute letters sent and then Tel harrassment letter, because of the amount and frequency of calls. Take a look at my thread it may be of help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Montague

 

I'm further down the line than you I've been chasing my CCA since Septemebr/October last year. I got the same response as you.

 

I asked for it again in my SAR and got exactly the same.

 

I then followed PT excellent thread and sent them the CPR letter

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

I was a bit of a chicken after that I'm afraid I didn't follw through with legal action as per PT's thread - but because I knew I had info missing from my SAR I took them to court for non compliance of that.

 

I eventually got a copy of a Sunday paper flyer application form that I filled out in 2003, now I'm just waiting to get the AQ from court to get my costs back and I'll see if can get the Court to make them produce either a proper credit agreement or confirmation that that's all they have.

 

I did keep paying B/Card up until the point that I took them to court in Jan this year, then I spent the money I would have sent them in issuing a summons, and so far (lot's of wood touching here) I've not had any of the hassling calls that normallay ensue when you stop paying. They've not sent me a statement either since mid Feb.

 

In short keep chipping away, they'll fob you off all the way but don't let them get away with it.

 

Wils

 

 

Wils

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

At last I have a reply from Barclaycard following my Subject Access Request lettersent on 26th May by Recorded Delivery. All they have sent me is copies of my statements from January 2004. They say in the letter "This information we have enclosed relating to this account is all that we hold." So they have never sent anything other than T&C's before. I have been getting serious hassle from Debt Collectors who say that no matter what I say the debt is enforceable! But if they have not got anything signed who can it be? Are they in breach of Data Protection for having passed it onto Debt collectors? What now? please help. Roko20650!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...