Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anyone know if lloyds can do this?


ccjjl82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ive had a visa cc with lloyds since 2001. Last year while I was in branch paying a bill they said they were changing from visa to airmiles and could i sign the form as it would save having to send it out to me. I think it was a new agreement. Wasnt really explained as the women ushered me into the room and said you just have to sign there to transfer your balance over to airmiles.

But if I do a CCA do they have to produce the agreement from 2001 or the new one? bearing in mind since the transfer I havent made any new transactions just paying off the (large) balance.

Only because if the account is disputed and they turn round with the new agreement, can I say, well actually the debt that is owed was actually accrued before the new agreement, therefore they need the 2001 agreement. Am I right?

Many thanks.

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry you're wrong ccjjl.

 

What you have done is signed up for a completely new agreement, complete with new interest rate (if applicable) & governed by the CCA 2006 amendments etc. In other words, they managed to get you to sign away any rights you might have had under your old agreement & all done on the bank's premises. Oh dear. :(

 

The good news is that if you had any unlawful charges on the old account (over limit fees etc) you can still reclaim them & should do so, with speed.

Edited by foolishgirl
addition

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your post

ah bummer. Is this legal? She never said it was a new agreement! just that I needed to sign it so they can transfer over. But I guess its just another sneaky side of lloyds.

what I am currently contesting is ppi on a card, which they say I selected on the application form. So where do I stand here?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess you could argue that you were forced into without any proper explanation of what you were signing. To do so, you would have to make a formal complaint to the bank & escalate it through the levels.

 

Re. the PPI - is this on the agreement that they have just cancelled?

If so, can you post up a copy (minus all personal details) so cagers have a better idea of what you are contesting?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Re. the PPI - is this on the agreement that they have just cancelled?

If so, can you post up a copy (minus all personal details) so cagers have a better idea of what you are contesting?

 

Yes the PPI was on the old agreement, but I had cancelled it about 5 years ago, if this changes anything. I dont have any copies of any agreements. I didnt even get a copy of the new one :eek: oh my makes me think what they get up to. Have sent a SAR and CCA request anyway so when (or if;-)) they have anything I will post it up.

 

Will put in a complaint then about the signing of the new agreement, and let you know how I get on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have typed up the letter, but I dont know if I should wait first to see what they produce with the CCA and SAR. They might send me the old one yet (hopefully). Do you think I should send it now or wait?

c

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...