Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can i ask these DCA's to provide proof if i have been paying for years?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5315 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had letters from various debt collectors regarding a debt i allegedly owe.

 

 

It all started with a letter from Buchanan, Clark & Wells (BCW) on 2/7/07.

 

 

I sent a reply on 10/7/07 asking for any proof that i owe the debt but they did not respond.

 

 

I received a letter from Wescot Credit Services dated 4/12/07 regarding the debt i allegedly owe

but i asked for proof and they did not respond either.

 

 

I got another letter from BCW dated 2/6/08 and I again asked them to provide proof

but i only got a letter from a solicitors dated 23/6/08 asking me to contact BCW.

 

 

I sent a letter to BCW dated 27/6/08 asking them to provide proof again but they did not respond.

 

 

I got a letter from BCW dated 13/8/08 and i replied on the 14/8/08 telling them to provide proof within 28 days

or i would be contact my local Citizen's Advice Bureau to deal with them.

 

I then received a letter from Scotcall Debt Collecting Services dated 28/8/2008.

I replied to that letter on 2/9/08 asking for proof that i owe the debt.

 

 

I received no response from Scotcall so i sent them another letter requesting proof on 3/2/09

and i sent another letter on 10/3/09 asking them to provide the proof i have requested or close the case.

 

All these companies just ignore my requests even though i am putting it all in writing as i do not deal with these companies on the phone.

 

 

What can i do to get a response from them?

I feel like i am in limbo as they will not provide proof but they won't close the case either. I am sick of them.

 

 

They are just passing the debt around so i get letters from several companies.

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Next time they write state that they are ignoring your letters and if you have to write to them again you will charge them £30 for each one.....

 

Or you could write them a LETTER BEFORE ACTION if they are threatening....especially with the recent court case against British Gas - (you could make them aware of this too !!) - Woman sues British Gas for harassment over repeated letters and bills - Telegraph

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ICO won't do a lot I'm afraid.

 

If the DCAs are ignoring you then I would ignore them. If they really had something on you they would be far more persistent.

 

In fact I am ignoring them - exactly the ones you have mentioned.:)

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 7 debts which i have been paying off for many years.

3 of the debts are being collected by Robinson Way,

1 by Go Debt,

1 by The Lewis Group and

the last 1 by C K Edrupt.

 

 

I have been paying them £1 every month after i went ot my local Citizen's Advice Bureau in 2004 for help

as i was getting many phone calls from Robinson Way.

Citizen's Advice just made the offers then after 2 years left me to manage and i have just been paying them.

 

1st debt, Abbey National bank account, I owe £194.

2nd debt, BT, I now owe £12.

3rd debt, Britannia, I owe £90.80 (all been collected by Rob Way)

4th debt, London Scottish for a loan, I owe £753, collected by Go Debt.

5th debt, Greenwoods for a loan, I owe £238.75, collected by C K Edrupt.

6th debt, Readers Digest, I owe £35.98, collected by Wescot.

7th debt, Shopacheck for a loan, I owe £1733.86, collected by The Lewis Group.

 

I took all the loans out when i was still in a well paid job but then the comapny went into administration and closed so i was left with nothing.

 

I have been reading through these forums and i wonder should i write to all these DCA's and ask them to provide any proof that i do indeed owe the debts? What is a CCA? Can anyone help me?

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blondmusic,

Looking at the list, I think the general consensus here would be

to send a Subject Access Request to Abbey National re the bank account (CCA not relevant to bank accounts) to check if there's any penalty charges you can claim back (they may well end up owing you);

Just pay off the BT one and maybe the Readers Digest one;

The loans - send CCA requests.

Don't forget the golden rules..PO's not cheques - don't sign anything - print your name.

All the best

Elsa :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blondmusic,

The Subject Access Request costs £10 payable to the Abbey National.

The Template Letter is here: http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/110--data-protection-act-1998-subject-access-request-.html

 

The CCA requests cost £1 each and the template is here:

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter.html

 

Send the CCA's to the debt collectors.

Send all by recorded delivery and save the PO/RD receipts as evidence.

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been going through paperwork regarding the Abbey account which Robinson Way are collecting. On a letter dated 22/11/2004 it says 'Due to ABBEY', on the next letter it says 'Due to ROBINSON WAY EX ABBEY'. Does this mean that Robinson Way now own the alleged debt and not Abbey? Should i now send a CCA request to Robinson Way instead of a Subject Access Request to Abbey?

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

With regard to your thread title question, you can ask the DCA or OC to provide a full statement of the acount for as long as they've been handling it. This is one of the things that the CCA covers but a lot of the DCAs and OCs don't bother sending them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...