Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I've moved your thread to our shoplifting forum for advice on this. I've also edited the title a bit, please let me know if I've misunderstood what you meant. Best, HB
    • I received a letter this morning from advantis acting on behalf of HMRC for a tax credit overpayment.. I am going to call them on Monday to set up a payment plan but am worried sick it’s going to show up on my credit file.. does anyone know if it will show now that hmrc are using them? 
    • I'm going to check the measurement units today as I feel this could well be happening otherwise I can't understand how the bill can be so high even when nobody there living sometimes. 
    • Totally stupid mistake struggling with money with 2 young kids no excuses so I won't bother justifying  just feeling deep regret and absolute fear for what happens next. Sincere moments of madness opportunistic and absolutely stupid Caught shoplifting from sainburies by and shop lifting plain clothed detective (penut butter almond milk chia seeds and nuts ) I only took 3 to 4 items from sainbries listed above  First time I did it In saisburies i have never done it before   Was given a letter banning me took details but no photo taken  I also had on me food items from mns that the store detianed at the same time as they wouldn't let me leave without showing a receipt as they said I would have stole those too (they werent wrong) . I have been to mns a few times in the last month and done a similar thing always general food shop  So I left the sainbries store when he let me go and left all the goods there mns.and sainsburies and did not return.  M&s and sainsbries are on the same high street   Questions  Was not caught by m&s will sainsburies share my info and will m&s be in touch? Presume they can check cctv of the time sainsburies detained me and probably find it  No police called when at sainburies  Scared that mns will also ban me after the event  or worse check cctv and have my details and pass to police to investigate  I am mortified at what I've done the detective did not mention anything about further letters / police or anything more other than taking my details and giving me a banning letter  My fear is they have told MNS and now MNS will investigate aswell they may have their own footage etc...and go further than sainsburies did at that time  Mns goods was fruit veg chicken cheese basically all food items  Advise please what could I be facing 😭
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

URGENT HELP DESPERATELY NEEDED: Student acc. Deposit dispute

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi all.


Here is my situation (i'll try and be brief).


I signed a tenancy agreement with my landlord in oct 07 but rent was never asked or enforced, another contract with revised conditions (rent etc.) was issued in April 08 and ended in July 08. I left the propoerty on the 21st June 08 - the other two tenants saw out their tenancies with the landlord (the landlord was living at the property also).


We were issued a email on sept 15th 08 stating that our deposits has been with held and that we were only being re-imbursed the sum of £87 of the original £312 due to a bill of £900 worth of cleaning to be done. Landlord sent photos and they only showed consmetic damaged - broken glasses, uncleaned behind the fridge, un-clean sink (prob from lazy housemates and due to broken tap which landlord never fixed - this happened at the end of may 08 and was never fixed until i left).


I sent emails to the landlord asking for proof of the £900 worth of work done - nothing ever sent :mad:. The emails from myself continued up until dec 08 where I ceased contact.


I then went into MCOL claim going down the TDS route as this was never provided, landlord wanted to defend, nothing after 28 days and then the magic defense turned up after I had put default judgement through.:shock:


I have had the landlords defense through and he says that I cannot claim TDS because I only had a license agreement with him (which is true i have read):-?.


Am I right in saying that the TDS route is now dead. I was orginally persuing the route of him not providing a tenanble property e.g we never had heating, internet was only available in feb 08, no proof has ever been provided of the work carried out.






Link to post
Share on other sites

yes that is correct.


We signed an initial contract in oct 08 but due to negotiations on my behalf, some terms i.e rent and duration of contract were modified. The biggest issue was the fact of whether or not the rent included bills etc and this was supposed to be regulated asap by the landlord.


[NB - The presentation of the first contract was done by the landlords father who is a property developper himself, however he is registered as bankrupt and I know for a fact that he uses his sons (my landlord) as directors of his company to evade tax and other things - I PRESUME. He presented me the contract and negotiations were done with him and his son, his son is the legal owner to the property and is the signee on the contract.]


We then heard nothing from the landlord with regards to rent up until the middle of our easter holidays where we received an email stating that he required payment for the last however many months and would like it paid by a certain date. I sent him an email explaining that it would be better if he waited another week so that we could receive our student loans for that term and that he would be paid in due course. We then heard nothing about the matter.


On the 24/4/08 I made a payment to the landlord totalling £2054 which covered me from oct to april inclusive. If I remember rightly we had not signed the contract yet - i think that this came about in the middle of May. My final payment of of £936 on the 9.6.08 covered me for May-July inclusive. As stated before i left the property on the 21 June but the contract I had signed did state that the tenancy would finish in July.


I did not receive an email regarding the 'state' of the property until the 15/09/08 (this quite coincidently coincided with a visit I was going to make to the landlord and my friends in the area - at this point i had had no trouble with him until i received this email literally 2 hours before i was about to leave.)


Landlord provided no inventory when we asked simple saying that 'we didnt need to worry about it'.


Thanks for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you rents upto date then you are in a better position.


So what was your MCOL for? Just TDS non-complaince or have you got into some detail about the intended deductions?


I thinl you should just be concentrating on the deductions from the deposit for 'damage'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

just wanted to make sure that on my claim of £500 I won't have to pay a fee for the allocation questionnaire???


Also if it does go to court will my trial fee be in accordance with what I was originally claiming, or because of interest, will it fall into the higher band of trial fees?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...