Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,  Here's my draft and please feel free to give me suggestion: ========== Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences.     I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name -----------------------------  
    • My wife dropped my daughter off at a kids party space on a trading estate and didn't think to look for signs as she parked outside the establishment. We got a £60 (reduced early payment) fine. Although now the signs are to be seen its a lot of money is this something we must now pay? Attached is the notice and the signs. Looks obvious now but when you are driving to a party warehouse on a trading estate and looking for the place itself its easy to miss this and especially when it seems logical to park there and walk in. My wife was there for 30 minutes. Thanks in advance Sam          A4.pdf
    • That's such a perverse judgment its almost unbelievable Looks like totally ignored everything and just gave judgement on something that's not compulsory as in name a driver or appeal did judge confuse having to name a driver in a motoring offence case like speeding with the civil?
    • The OH had letter from Resolvecall regarding a very old LTSB debt at the start of the month. Knowing it was SB, I sent off the SB letter to Intrum who owns the debt. They responded to the OH last week when I was away. They basically said speak to Resolvecall and the standard letter, we'll pop to your house malarkey.... Just ignore as Intrum own the debt and from the looks of it have ignored the SB letter? The OH gets twitchy with these things, thanks PM.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help required with Cabot


arbo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife's Monument debt has been purchased by part of the Cabot group and she has now been issued with a County Court Claim. The claim has been issued by Cabot Financial (UK) Limited although the debt was purchased by Kings Hill (No 1) Ltd. The assignment confirms that as the Group's servicing company, Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd are entitled to recive money on behalf of Kings Hill (No 1) Ltd. Is the fact that the claim has been issued by a company that does nor form part of the assignment, albeit part of the same group, grounds for a defence that the claimant is not entitled to payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

42man .... a transcript of the PoC is as follows:

 

"The claimant is part of the Cabot Financial Group and has purchase the debt(s) scheduled below. Despite requests for payment the defendant has failed to pay the sum of 6853.36 in relation to the Defendant's Monument Credit Card account mumber XXXXXXX and the Claimant claims: the sum of 7143.36 together with interest under section 60 of the County Courts ACt 1984 and costs."

 

That is it. There is no record of a default notice or letter before action. The Claimant on the form is recorded as Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd rather than who the debt was allegedly sold to Kings Hill (No 1) Ltd.

 

This is new to me so I am not sure what you mean by a CPR31.14 or a CPR18. I have however sent Cabot the following letter, cribbed from other parts of this excellent website. Can you advise what else I can do or how I can offer a defence?

 

"NOTICE UNDER CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES

I write under the authority previously provided on behalf of my wife and further to your County Court Claim Form issued on 31 March 2009 in the sum of £7,143.36.

I am disappointed that you have elected this route, rather than attempt resolution of the disputed amount by responding to my letter of 28 May 2007. I also note that the last correspondence received from you, dated 11 August 2008 advises that you were returning the account to your Collections Department and makes no other reference to any other intended course of action. Your letter does not fulfil the requirements of the pre-action conduct required by the Ministry of Justice’s Civil Procedure Rules. This latest letter also alleges a debt of £7,907.84, rather than the £6,853.36 claimed in your Claim Form referred to above. Can you please explain the difference between the two figures?

In respect of the Civil Procedure Rules protocols and I put forward that you have a requirement to provide the following:

1) A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened. Please note that a "true copy" as defined by the Consumer Credit Act will not be acceptable in this case, and a copy of the actual executed agreement, including signature, is required. I enclose a payment of £1 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, which should not be used for any other purpose and which should be returned if you are unable to comply with my request. I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with the request for a copy of the agreement and statement of account under these sections of the Act.

2) In addition, all records that you or Monument hold on my wife relevant to this case, including but not limited to

a. A transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, payments and both the amounts of credit and any repayments made to the account.

b. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations.

c. Where there has been any event in the account history over this period that has required manual intervention by any person, disclosure of any indication or notes that have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to the account held by my wife with Monument. is required.

d. True copies of any notice of assignment sent to my wife, with a copy of any proof of postage that is held.

e. True copies of any default notice or enforcement notice sent to my wife, with a copy of any proof of postage that is held.

f. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

g. Details of any collection or other charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

h. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

i. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my wife’s data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998.

j. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

k. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

I make this request to ensure that each party has equal footings which can allow action to proceed speedily fairly and without undue costs or waste of courts time.

To allow time to prepare my wife’s defence I will give you 10 days from the date of this letter to respond with the above, failure to comply will result in a complaint being made to the Court, in addition to the FOS for any breaches of OFT and CCA codes. This includes breaches as a result of initiating a County Court claim where failing to provide or produce documents make litigation improper.

Furthermore, I reserve my wife’s right to make a copy of this letter and other letters, available for inspection to the Court and Financial/Consumer regulators and use it as part of her defence should you fail to comply with this request.

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

I await your response. In the meanwhile and for the avoidance of any doubt, there is and continues to be, no acknowledgement of the debt on the part of my wife or anyone else acting for her."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Arbo,

 

Cabot can be beaten.

 

My thread might help you:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/152289-cabot-say-debt-not-15.html#post2104983

 

It's a long thread but hopefully you'll see that patience pays off!

 

Good Luck!

 

BTW, they will most likely lie and intimidate and be arrogant in the extreme but if you keep a file of all coresspondence between you and send everything registered post or email, then you can beat them.

 

PV :-)

Edited by PossVox

LOWELLS-Stat Demand Set Aside-No CCA & Statute Barred-£1800-Gone Away-April 2008

 

Scotcall on behalf of Cabot-£2200-no CCA returned to Cabot-file closed-March 2009

 

Cabot-Court Claim issued despite no CCA and Stat Barred-Claim discontinued-March 2009

__________________________________________

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...