Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have captured the best images of the sign at the entrance to the car park that I could, from Google Street View. It strikes me that no mention/agreement of having to pay £100 could have been seen from the car.  The writing is too small.
    • My aged uncle had been paying for his TV licence by auto renewing monthly direct debits despite (despite turning 75 years old 7 years ago). My request for a refund was ignored for over a month, so I made a Direct Debit Indemnity claim and received a full refund for 7 years overpayment within the day from my bank.  It was very simple.   I then asked TV licensing for a compensation payment for the interest and they have refused on the grounds they did nothing wrong. It seems they do not take customer dates of birth. This is why  they have no idea whether their customers should be charged or whether they have reached the age for a free license.   It seems to me (especially for the benefit of old people), it would be simple to include a date of birth in the application process and therefore automatically cancel direct debits or even reject applications once they become eligible for a free license.   My question is, can I insist on interest? I understand statutory 8% interest is only an award if a judge  (at a county court etc) allows it. As I received the refund without going to court, I guess I cannot insist on that interest. However, I hope to proceed to make this scandal more public and seek the interest on his behalf.   Any ideas gratefully received.
    • Hi all,   Car: 5 years old, 30k mileage purchased from the main dealer of the brand the car is.     Handover was pretty rushed and after 2 hours we just wanted to get out of there with the car which got further delayed because various accessories were removed from the car - something quite common if another customer is buying a similar car and has requested for instance mats to be included.  Luckily I had already taken photographs at the point of reserving the car a few weeks ago so stated we expected these to be in the car.   Main Issue:   It states on the multipoint check "Four Wheel Drive: All four wheels must always be fitted with tyres of the same type, make and tread pattern" We have 1 front tyre of a budget brand, the other 3 the same however tread levels are very different in all 4 with the rears always differing by half a tyre (4 vs 7)   Annoyingly the entire book pack was missing (raised for replacement) however I found the manual online and it too states: "All four wheels must be equipped with tires that are the same brand and have the same construction and tread pattern so that the drive system is not damaged by different wheel speeds"   Finally one tyre has cracking around the shoulder though unsure how much this matters on the location - this is the lower tread level tyre too.  (raised during first visit) and passed the MOT only a few days ago with flying colours.   I had my phone on the desk recording the entire 2 hours due to the way the pre-sales was handled and to transcribe the Multipoint checklist:   41:40 Sales Guy says: Multipoint check included is part of the service Multipoint Check and oil service carried out last month (says date) been checked over for any last minute things this is for you, all ticked off, lets tear these off as we go You need to sign now to say you have received the report   Obviously our signature is on the basis of what he said verbally that all was ticked off and ok.   The day ended essentially with all documents in a folder, keys and folder handed over and we said our goodbyes.  We then dragged him back and spent a further 40 minutes faffing around for the bits that were missing in the car by essentially taking them out of anothrer car, trying the fit, finding another etc   So any leg to stand on re tyres and more importantly, the policy the brand sits on with the checksheet and manual?   thanks Apologies for those who do prefer a bullet point list, I have tried to keep just the facts in here!  
    • After a repossession start 2019 the lender marketed the property and received offers within weeks - which were relayed to the mortgagor.  All were low offers compared to lender's original valuation.  2 of the offers were unable to proceed due to other legal issues. One was able to proceed - but lender failed to accept.   One year later lender organized sealed bids situation with agents to try gather interest.  The same buyer as one year earlier placed the highest bid - the same level as before.  However I now understand the lender is renovating the property with a view to rent it.  And now pursuing mortgagor for bankruptcy. What can mortgagor do? Lender has wasted 18months adding interest and extra costs.  And created a huge shortfall. Meanwhile, lender has refused to disclose costs or interest accrued since repossession     
    • Be aware that making a separate claim under GDPR is not as straightforward as making a part 7 money claim.There are risks and costs associated subject to what track its placed in.   It is possible to add an additional claim to a Counter Claim ...which would keep the claim in the same track and part of the Part 20 counterclaim.   https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part20#20.7   Andy
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Tate-Lloyd/Claims Management UK


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3724 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

hi spw78 i have had the money back off the credit cards that i paid cmuk i rang the credit card and told them it was fraud they said they would get the the fraud team in to have a look and if it was they would wipe the money off and they did. so good luck to everbody hope you all get a result

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 239
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh wow. That's excellent news. Thanks for that c123.

I think I'll give it a go.

Did they ask any questions regarding the money being paid to a claim management company and what it was for?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Hi All

 

THE STORY WITH TATE LLOYD

 

Tate Lloyd went bust after CM uk sent on thousands of their customers and tate lloyd told them ALL to stop paying as there was a dispute. Suddenly it all caught up and people were taken into court and demanding to pay the entire amount which no one had, leaving people with terrible credit ratings and loss of houses and personal items.

 

CM UK refer all thier customers to 2 companies.. Legal Redress and Tate Lloyd. Once tate announced they were bust legal redress (with no legal experience) taken on all the claims. Legal redress would basically just do the admin on the cases and once complete be passed over to the solicitor next door..

 

The fee you pay is basically there fee and at the end they take it from the other side... Thats if your loan hasnt already been paid off - bare in mind it can take a min of 2 yrs!!

 

HOW IT WORKS...

once passed over to admin team they apply for a section77 which is a agreement that you signed. They then send this to a company called FAIR CLAIMS which assess it for them for free and gives them a basic what is wrong with your agreement. Once this comes back it can then be sent to the solictor given to another admin team which will write off to the company on your behalf.

 

WHAT THEY DONT TELL YOU...

 

 

  • If you change your mind for whatever reason the solicitor charges you for the time taken per an hour.. £250 per an hr fee
  • Small Print - Read it and don't sign it unless your happy with what it explains and not what they tell you!!
  • The work complete can be easily complete yourself and will be MUCH quicker!

Hope This Helps :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yes i can

 

As mentioned in my previous message. Legal Redress have taken all CM UK claims so they would have you on there system. 0845 293 2873 You will need to hurry tho as my understanding is the company is going bust and setting up a new business.. Please see Websites by printing.com | all about printing.com

 

adz forgot to mention, do you have a number for CMUK as i have phoned one company called CM and they don't have my details anymore!!:( are they the same company, its so frustrating!! Help needed from anyone.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

I have just read the Tate-Lloyd story, and I can tell you all that Tate is not "bust" and is infact still around and is also contactable. I also know of the ruthless money motivated spine twisting CMUK.

 

I have read through all of the posts and I can say that the system does work!!! However like with any company, if the manpower isn't there it won't work.

 

I can agree to disagree on some points, fro example, Tate was taking work at the same time as CMUK but from other sources and believed she could cope, well...... clearly not and due to this has been left out in the cold on her own.

 

They say that success can come at painful prices!!

 

Just thought this may be useful?

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Looking at recent decisions by the Solicitors' Disciplinary Tribunal, I came across some interesting information that I thought I'd share:

 

On 2 February 2010, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal made an Order in respect of one Geoffrey Lloyd, against whom an allegation of dishonesty was proved, and he was also found liable for costs. This is a matter of public record.

 

Geoffrey Lloyd was a solicitor's clerk, and a partner in a LLP called Swansea Legal Services which took over another solicitor's practice (PJ Williams).

 

What has all this to do with Tate-Lloyd, you may ask. Well, PJ Williams address was Corner Chambers, 53 Mansel Street, Swansea - the same as Tate-Lloyd! I note that the premises are currently to let.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Company Profile Report (CPR)

 

Commercial debt managementlink3.gif

Company Name: TATE-LLOYD LEGAL SERVICES LLP

 

Print Report

 

 

Previous Name(s): NO PREVIOUS NAME HAS BEEN RECORDED DURING THE LAST 20 YEARS

 

Registered Number: OC343569

 

Registered Office: CORNER CHAMBERS

53 MANSEL STREET

SWANSEA

SA1 5TE

 

Incorporation Date: 24/02/2009

 

Country Of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Limited Liability Partnership

 

Accounting Reference Date: 28/02

Last Accounts Made Up To:

Next Accounts Due: 24/11/2010

 

Last Annual Return:

Next Annual Return Due: 24/03/2010 (Overdue)

 

Company Status: Active - Proposal to Strike off

Type of Accounts: NO ACCOUNTS FILED Accounts

 

Nature Of Business: None Supplied

 

 

Filing History

 

 

04/05/2010 FIRST GAZETTE

20/04/2009 MEMBER RESIGNED GEOFFREY LLOYD

24/02/2009 INCORPORATION DOCUMENT

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

 

 

Mortgage Data

NONE

 

 

 

 

Report Generated 01/06/2010

©2007 Credit UK Ltd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we have seen this before-but this looks like an updated version.

very interesting.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin - see my post above.

 

The date that Lloyd resigned coincides with the SRA investigation into his other activities.

 

Interestingly, at one point Tate-Lloyd claimed that they did not need to be licenced by MOJ because they were solicitors - they were not - Lloyd was a clerk.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

an update... as of August 2010

 

According to Company House (tele: 03031234500) Claim Management UK based in Swansea are in liquidation. They referred me to the company handling this called Stone and Co. run by Gareth Stone, (tele: 01792654607) also based in Swansea. I was informed that CM had no assets so it was pointless to pursue them for any fees that I naively paid them (about £400). I had a right to claim but in his words "Whats the point"..

 

So there you go... [problem] artistry at its best. Worst thing is under company law... the Directors Chris and James, get away Scot free, able to open up another [problem] company and pry on the weak minded or the naive, I could kick myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...