Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

meerkatsmimm vs. EGG Card


meerkatsmimm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5416 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Folks,

 

This is another of my accounts, hubbies info will follow under his own thread.

 

Currently we are on £1.00 agreed payment plans with EGG, and give them their due, they have been pretty decent to date in how they have dealt with us.

 

I was one of their 'preffered customers' who got told last year they were no longer honouring my Credit line with them, and that i had to cease using the card with immediate effect. At that time I had an excellent credit score, no late payments since taking it out and yet my husband got to hold onto his card! anyways....

 

I recieved a Default Notice 5th March 09, its listed below, and I would appreciate it if those who know wouldnt mind having a look over it to see if its as it should be.

 

As with several of my other accounts, I have paid PPI on this card and cannot claim, although that didnt stop them continuing to take PPI payments!

 

While I dont want to rock the boat when they have been so agreeable to date, I sent through a CCA request on 4th March and to date have received nothing back as a response.

 

I noticed the last time I was in the online secure area, that they have a clickthrough allowing you to view your agreement online. Strangely, neither mine nor my husbands was available.

 

My account was started early 04.

 

Having read some other threads, EGG dont seem to want to send CCA's out, especially earlier ones. What should be my next move as I dont want them to sell me on, but I do want to push things to the next stage?

 

Will continue to make agreed payments, even though I got a very odd letter this week stating their intentions to take me to court for non-payment (even though they have set up the agreement!)

 

DN below, all help appreciated from you kind folk x.

 

image0-5-1.jpg

 

image0-6-1.jpg

 

image0-7-1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant see anything wrong with it.

though i am puzzled as to why they are sending it as they agreed to your dmp.

 

i'd send them a secure msg and question why they have sent it.

 

i'd also cancel and reclaim that ppi!

surely it was mis-sold?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks - had hoped the DN was invalid but was pretty sure it was ok. Have a DN from NCCS which I do believe to be invalid - no date when it expires - just says 14 days from date of letter - am i right in thinking they have to actually put the date rather than just say 14 days?

 

If so then, if they terminate the account due to this dn what am i due to pay?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'ed have to post a few more details on the last q, but yes it must give a date on the dn.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, not able to comment on DN, I just don't know the answer.

However, I do know that if you agreement was pre-2005 it is highly likely that it is unenforceable and you should act on this immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Small update on this,

 

Egg have now terminated my account, so its a pity the DN isnt invalid in someway!

 

They have again recently confirmed the token payment set up, but having CCA'd them over a month ago their only response was that to process the info (the CCA request) then I would need to send them a signed declaration and proof of address, plus copy of either drivers licence or passport.

 

This strikes me as very strange, as it is very clear I dont have to sign the letters for a CCA request and they know this - so why are they stalling?

 

Both our accounts were late 03/early 04 so would have fallen at the time before it wasnt a requirement to provide a signed agreement for electronic applications, so my thoughts are that they are trying to get two signatures.

 

How should I progress this with them? Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

This strikes me as very strange, as it is very clear I dont have to sign the letters for a CCA request and they know this - so why are they stalling?

 

Both our accounts were late 03/early 04 so would have fallen at the time before it wasnt a requirement to provide a signed agreement for electronic applications, so my thoughts are that they are trying to get two signatures.

 

You can argue with them about whether or not you are required to provide a signature, or you can give in and sign the request. If you do, make sure you sign in such a way that you will recognise your signature if it ever appears again..... Photoshop and all that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks militantc,

 

I argued the case with CAP1, who steadfastly refused to provide me with anything I asked for without my correct signature, and they backed down when I quoted the 'you have been writing to me at this address and its not a legal requirement for me to provide this signature for a CCA request'.

 

So think I will try this, just wish the DN had been invalid in some way, since they have now terminated me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Folks,

 

Believe it or not, I have not had anything from Egg since this in April.

 

I have CPR'd them with letter one and had no response.

 

My SAR is due early July, nothing as yet.

 

No CCA from them as yet and I sent a letter to them stating that I didnt need to provide any proof of signature, they had been writing to me at my address for months without any issue.

 

Hubby got the same letter asking for proof of identity, sent the same letter, and got his agreement (abet an approved limit jobby) within a couple of weeks.

 

What now? My original request for a CCA was very early March!

 

Have continued to pay them the £1 per month they agreed to - should I stop this now or am I leaving myself open?

 

Sending CPR letter 2 and a further one asking to put my twice terminated account back to zero and stop processing my data. Anybody have a good template for this kind of letter?

 

Thanks,

 

meerkat x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...