Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK.  But it's going to take a little while to read through all these documents and put them together, when a lot of us on the forum are working.  Be patient.  But we'll get there!
    • So a follow up for the last letter.  I got a SMS saying I had a new letter and I viewed it online.   it told me that my account is no longer on hold and I should call them to set a repayment plan.   er..no I don’t think so !   Still no response to my CCA request so I guess I will just wait for the next PAP form to come 🙄   is it worth sending a 3rd CCA request?
    • Thank you Dave, yes I have been reading a lot, but as you already mentioned mine is court one for some reason. Yes, the CPR request - printed and sent after completing the AOS online, as per dx's instructions.   And yeah the full timeline had me scrapping the vehicle and moving to new place in between the date of alleged contravention and receiving first "debt recovery" letters. To none of them did I respond as all of them said that I cannot dispute the charge as seen in the letter attached. 02/01/2020 - alleged contravention 29/11/2020 - scrapage of mentioned vehicle that I was still the registered keeper of and V5 had my address of the time on it since DVLA was reaching me and they had my details from them it should be correct 02/02/2022 - I move to my new place 18/01/2023 - first letter of debt recovery to my new address 21/11/2023 - letter of claim raised to county court Funny enough I never used that parking, so since I didn't see the pictures (the PCN or any reminder was never sent to my address in the first place, on the 18/01/2023 it was literally the first contact) I cannot even take a look whether it was my housemate as he sometimes borrowed my car, but then again I checked my emails and everything and on 01/01/2020 I was flying into the country back from holiday and was landing at Luton London Airport so me myself definitely had no business in Stansted area. I cannot even check for mercy period, whether that was actually my car or reg clone, nothing, as I never had that letter in my hands, sadly.
    • Good grief, this has to be one of the most stupid invoices issued for the most petty of reasons that we've seen here. What was the reason for your two visits? I ask as there may be the chance of getting the leisure complex to intervene.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

Son unable to withdraw Jobseekers allowance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My son opened some time ago a Gold account with RBS alongside his normal bank account. He never used it but set up a DD from the Gold account with tiscali for £20 approx when he moved into his own place for a broadband set up. Having spoken to RBS myself, it seems the charges have escalated now to almost £400 and still rising. They said the DD was returned unpaid as there was no money in the account to pay it. They are refusing now to allow him to take his jobseekers payment from his normal account as he has to pay them back the charges. Can I use the right of appropriation letter to allow him to get this money from his account? The money was paid in yesterday 9th April. This is the 2nd time he has been unable to draw money with his card and has had to move back home because he has no money

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps a Co-op cashminder account- can be applied for over the phone?

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS have no right to take this money or prevent its withdrawal, This is money paid to him by the Government ........it is a benefit paid to for a special purpose to assist him in seeking employment .......by taking it they are preventing him from fulfilling his part of the contract to use it to seek employment....... even if the Government own most of RBS they cannot touch it. I would send a PM to IceMaiden who had a similar problem......it finally cost a particular Bank a lorra lorra money....... her Bank took her university grant, that lost time in obtaining her education degrees.

I would also make your MP aware of this.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS have no right to take this money or prevent its withdrawal, This is money paid to him by the Government ........it is a benefit paid to for a special purpose to assist him in seeking employment .......by taking it they are preventing him from fulfilling his part of the contract to use it to seek employment....... even if the Government own most of RBS they cannot touch it. I would send a PM to IceMaiden who had a similar problem......it finally cost a particular Bank a lorra lorra money....... her Bank took her university grant, that lost time in obtaining her education degrees.

I would also make your MP aware of this.

 

sparkie

Utter nonsense, once JSA hits the account it is treated as income(the same as if you were working). The OP's son can use the FROA(First Right of Appropriation) however, the easiest thing for him to do is open an account elsewhere and get the benefit paid in there plus, if not done already, get rid of the bells and whistles element of the RBS account.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry yourbank,

 

I totally disagree on this one ......jobseekers allowance is stated what it is ....an allowance paid for one specific purpose only and is the bare minimum a person needs to actually live on....until that person has removed the money from his account it belongs to the government...FACT and has been ruled so by the Law Lords.

 

What you are actually saying is that if the jobseeker takes the money in cash from his Post Office..... the Bank have the right to meet him outside and take the money off him ........( analogy), these examples were often used by Master of the Rolls Lord Denning in explaining points of law.

 

As proved in the case of a Bank taking a Government grant to offset an overdraft in the case I quoted...they were taken to Court for theft, and that was proved compensation was awarded in the 10's of thousands.

 

By taking a jobseekers allowance awarded by the government and taxpayer it is theft .....not misappropriation, because the action of taking it by the bank is with no intent ever to give it back......that is the definition of theft........ and not misappropriation.

The particular case I refer to is the reason I take this view.

 

sparkie:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hit me with the case Law.

Never mentioned the Post Office

Again hit me with case law.

Considering the government has already given responses to petitions re SSAA1992 and Tax Credits Act, not really seeing what you are saying.....

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it stands and for practical reasons, the new bank account followed by reclaiming the charges is the most effective path, as far as I know from experience.

 

I've not had success any other way!

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...