Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

London Underground


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4443 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It is extremely unlikely that the rail company would seek to prosecute you because they have agreed a disposal. I have to say that I really am quite surprised that they allowed a settlement so quickly in this sort of case, but that is amatter for them of course

 

As for your friend, that's a different matter. Lending you his pass was a particularly stupid thing for any member of staff to do. It would seem that LUL have clearly discovered that you are known to each other and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out the likely scenario in that you didn't expect to get caught and he expected his pass back when your journey was done.

 

LUL are not obliged to issue him a new pass if they do not believe his story and if they believe that he has been complicit in assisting you to avoid a fare they could even prosecute him rather than dealing with it wholly internally and that would likely result in dismissal.

 

Even if they don't have sufficient evidence to proceed to prosecution, they do not have to re-issue a free pass to him if they believe that it was wilfully misused and that he and you have been untruthful.

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 533
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks alot for your prompt reply. What if my friend tells the truth that he was not aware i had the pass and had used it until last week when his supervisor informed him that the pass had been confiscated from someone who claimed to be a friend of his.

He actually thought he had lost it because i had not told him i had picked the pass up to return to him when he had left it in the gym we go to together, but stupidily i used it the next day and got caught.

Would that have any bearing in his defence as i would not want him to lose his job over this. He only told his supervisor that he did not know me because he knew they would instantly accuse him of giving it to me with the intention of using it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks alot for your prompt reply. What if my friend tells the truth that he was not aware i had the pass and had used it until last week when his supervisor informed him that the pass had been confiscated from someone who claimed to be a friend of his.

He actually thought he had lost it because i had not told him i had picked the pass up to return to him when he had left it in the gym we go to together, but stupidily i used it the next day and got caught.

Would that have any bearing in his defence as i would not want him to lose his job over this. He only told his supervisor that he did not know me because he knew they would instantly accuse him of giving it to me with the intention of using it.

 

It seems to me that is really down to who they believe.

 

From your post it seems that you told the inspector at the time it was your friend's pass and you say he didn't put that in his notes because 'he helped you out a bit' when you 'didn't want to get him in trouble'.

 

That doesn't mean he didn't tell his superiors later though does it?

 

Revenue & prosecution staff are usually very hot on following up matters that involve apparent staff fiddles in my experience.

 

When you were caught you said it was 'your friend's pass' and then later, he tells his supervisor he has lost his pass.

 

Next, his supervisor is advised by the revenue team that they have retrieved his pass being misused by you and that you have claimed to be 'his friend'.

 

His supervisor questions him about this and he denied knowing you.

 

If your friend now goes back on that and tells his supervisor that he does know you, but didn't know that you had his pass, who would you believe?

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

I would like to ask what should I do and what penalty can I expect.

I was caught on the underground station by the inspector without a ticket. when I saw inspector I was trying to turn back but she asked me for a ticket and I admitted not having it. I entered the station through the gate behind someone. I did because I was trying desperately safe some money.

Now they sent me a letter saying that legal proceeding may be initiated. What should I write in responde and what maximum and minimum penalty can I expect.

Thank you very much in advance for any help.

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I would like to ask what should I do and what penalty can I expect.

I was caught on the underground station by the inspector without a ticket. when I saw inspector I was trying to turn back but she asked me for a ticket and I admitted not having it. I entered the station through the gate behind someone. I did because I was trying desperately safe some money.

Now they sent me a letter saying that legal proceeding may be initiated. What should I write in responde and what maximum and minimum penalty can I expect.

Thank you very much in advance for any help.

 

Tom

 

your looking at £250 + a criminal record, money wasted which you could of used for spelling and grammar lessons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I would like to ask what should I do and what penalty can I expect.

I was caught on the underground station by the inspector without a ticket. when I saw inspector I was trying to turn back but she asked me for a ticket and I admitted not having it. I entered the station through the gate behind someone. I did because I was trying desperately safe some money.

Now they sent me a letter saying that legal proceeding may be initiated. What should I write in responde and what maximum and minimum penalty can I expect.

Thank you very much in advance for any help.

 

Tom

 

Firstly, please ignore 'WeatherCold', everyone else does. It's a bit rich for him to suggest you need grammar lessons when he uses 'your' instead of the correct 'You are' or, 'You're'

 

You should write to the prosecutor's office asking whether you might be allowed to settle the matter 'out of Court'

 

They do not have to permit this and where there is clear evidence of an attempt to avoid paying a fare as your original post admits, it is unlikely, but you will not know unless you try.

 

The maximum penalty if convicted of the offence of 'intent to avoid a fare' is a fine of up to £1000. If it is a first offence and if you plead guilty, that is likely to be reduced to between £100 and £150. If you are lucky, you may get a very sympathetic Court and may even be fined less.

 

You would probably also be ordered to pay the costs of the prosecution, which will probably be in the order of £100 plus the unpaid fare and a 'Victim surcharge' of £15

 

If you are fortunate enough to get the prosecutor to agree to an administrative disposal, you can expect to pay around £100 - £150 to avoid Court action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, please ignore 'WeatherCold', everyone else does. It's a bit rich for him to suggest you need grammar lessons when he uses 'your' instead of the correct 'You are' or, 'You're'

 

You should write to the prosecutor's office asking whether you might be allowed to settle the matter 'out of Court'

 

They do not have to permit this and where there is clear evidence of an attempt to avoid paying a fare as your original post admits, it is unlikely, but you will not know unless you try.

 

The maximum penalty if convicted of the offence of 'intent to avoid a fare' is a fine of up to £1000. If it is a first offence and if you plead guilty, that is likely to be reduced to between £100 and £150. If you are lucky, you may get a very sympathetic Court and may even be fined less.

 

You would probably also be ordered to pay the costs of the prosecution, which will probably be in the order of £100 plus the unpaid fare and a 'Victim surcharge' of £15

 

If you are fortunate enough to get the prosecutor to agree to an administrative disposal, you can expect to pay around £100 - £150 to avoid Court action

 

Thank you very much for your respond.

I intent to write to the prosecutor and explain my behaviour with financial problems and ask for out of court option.

I hope they will agree.

 

Thanks a lot once again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Thanks for the help...what do you not believe? I am absolutely genuine on this...

 

Let me get this right...you used to work for TFL, you had a test pass you 'forgot' to hand in & also a PAYG oyster....you dont look at the credit remaining message when you tap in/out....and you seriously expect to be given the benefit of the doubt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question of my own and I have posted it in a seperate thread so spare me if you find this repetitive.

In nov 2004 I was travelling without a ticket and then was caught, I was new to the country then and basically agreed to whatever the ticket inspector said, they asked me to pay 20 pounds on the spot but I dint have that money then so they let me go after taking my address. I dint receive any letter from them for four weeks and then I changed my address. So after 4 months I got a call from old landlord informing me of a court summons letter he has got for me, I collected the letter and realised it was from marylebone magistrates court and fine for 150 pounds.

 

I immediately called them and paid 50 pounds and paid the other 100 in installments, until now I dint realise that this could possibly be a criminal conviction. It has stuck me now and I want to know if this was put down as a criminal conviction or judgement against me, I have checked the trustonline.org.uk register to see if there was any judgement against me but couldnt find anything.

 

Is there any way I can find out if there was a criminal conviction against me ?

 

your input will be highly appreciated..

 

thanks,

 

Golu

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, do you still have the letter advising you of the fine?

 

If yes, it will tell you what offence was charged and therefore what you were convicted of.

 

Second, if it says it was a Byelaw offence, e.g: National Railways Byelaw 18.1 , then it is less serious than having been charged with 'intent to avoid a fare' contrary to Section 5 of The Regulation of Railways Act (1889).

 

Whilst there is a record of a conviction by a Court, this may not always make it on to the PNC and in fact, only a small proportion of such offences ever do at the present time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply.

 

I cant find the first correspondences from the court, the only one I have says 'ORDER' and does not contain any information about any charge, it just says fine of 152.50 pence and its break down as

RAILWAY - FAIL PAY LONDON UNDERGROUND

FCOMP 2.50

FCOST 50.00

FO 100.00

 

It is from marylebone magistrates court ( mind you this was may 2005) and it also says failure to pay may result in warrant for your arrest.

 

It has a fine reference number on it. Can I contact the court to find out if this made to PNC.

 

I have also checked on trust online org uk which is now the register of judgements of magistrates court and county court but dint find anything on my record...

 

thanks again

Edited by learningtrade
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply.

 

I cant find the first correspondences from the court, the only one I have says 'ORDER' and does not contain any information about any charge, it just says fine of 152.50 pence and its break down as

RAILWAY - FAIL PAY LONDON UNDERGROUND

FCOMP 2.50

FCOST 50.00

FO 100.00

 

It is from marylebone magistrates court ( mind you this was may 2005) and it also says failure to pay may result in warrant for your arrest.

 

It has a fine reference number on it. Can I contact the court to find out if this made to PNC.

 

I have also checked on trust online org uk which is now the register of judgements of magistrates court and county court but dint find anything on my record...

 

thanks again

 

I'd suggest that as this is five years old, if it had made it to PNC this is a relatively low level offence and the conviction will be 'spent'

 

I wouldn't worry about it now if I were you

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks CodjA, I called up the court today and they dont have any records on their system for a 5 year old case, they reckon they have archived my case and hence would have to retrieve it..

 

I have already sent them a written letter as requested by them to start retrieving the archive process...I am told it might take a month or so and may be charged..Funny thing is I have checked trust online org and there dont seem to be any information about me..

 

Also I am going to do a basic disclosure CRB on me to see if there are any unspent conviction on me...

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRPO is spot on IME.

Also the TOC might take notice of their RPIs opinion in this matter, most experienced staff have a finely tuned bullsh*t detector, if they believe your mistaken rather than dishonest in any way it'll go in your favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone,

as stupid as it may sound but i was caught using my parters over18 student oyster card on the bus. now i have received court summon, and i am helpless and can't think anything else other than getting a criminal conviction..any idea and help is highly appreciated...please

Link to post
Share on other sites

please help me!!!

i was caught using someone else freedom pass on the Underground around 23 march 2010, and i didn't received anything yet...

at that time i told them my details, address, and they kept the freedom pass(this belongs to someone that is living with me)...

please tell me what should i do in this case?

i have to receive a letter from court? or what?

I WILL HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD????

WHAT SHOULD I DO???

please please help me...please...because i can't sleep at night!!!

 

AND ALSO WHAT SHOULD I DO - CALL THEM BEFORE I RECEIVE THE LETTER? OR WAIT FOR THAT?

 

what's the telephone number wher i should call the underground to settle this out of court???

 

please please

Link to post
Share on other sites

please help me!!!

i was caught using someone else freedom pass on the Underground around 23 march 2010, and i didn't received anything yet...

at that time i told them my details, address, and they kept the freedom pass(this belongs to someone that is living with me)...

please tell me what should i do in this case?

i have to receive a letter from court? or what?

I WILL HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD????

WHAT SHOULD I DO???

please please help me...please...because i can't sleep at night!!!

 

AND ALSO WHAT SHOULD I DO - CALL THEM BEFORE I RECEIVE THE LETTER? OR WAIT FOR THAT?

 

what's the telephone number wher i should call the underground to settle this out of court???

 

please please

 

Yes you will receive letters from the prosecuting agency & the court.

Yes you will receive a criminal record.

You dont know who is prosecuting yet so you cannot call anyone.

They wont settle out of court unless you can show extremely mitigating circumstances as this type of offence is thought to be very serious in the eyes of TFL.

 

Unfortunately you will have to wait until they contact you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Although I have read as much posts I could I would like your opinion to my situation.

I was caught by an inspector using a student card although I am not a student.

I was asked some questions and then he wrote my answers down along with my statement that I really regret and I am willing to pay a fine. Then both my oyster cards were taken.

Some days before that incident I was issued a 25 pounds fine because I was using that Oyster card.

 

Will they be able to find out both fines?

 

If the letter from tfl comes and I state them that I did a wrong thing and I am accepting to pay any cost my action caused and any fine I deserve will they accept to settle it without without going to court?

 

THanks for any replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Although I have read as much posts I could I would like your opinion to my situation.

I was caught by an inspector using a student card although I am not a student.

I was asked some questions and then he wrote my answers down along with my statement that I really regret and I am willing to pay a fine. Then both my oyster cards were taken.

Some days before that incident I was issued a 25 pounds fine because I was using that Oyster card.

 

Will they be able to find out both fines?

 

If the letter from tfl comes and I state them that I did a wrong thing and I am accepting to pay any cost my action caused and any fine I deserve will they accept to settle it without without going to court?

 

THanks for any replies

 

Much of the answer really depends on what is in that statement 'that you really regret'.

 

What is it that you said, which you now regret?

Did you you give false details to try to make out the card was your own?

 

Yes, the system records all of the Penalty Fare issues, so the earlier one can be taken into consideration.

 

It seems clear that you were using someone else's student card and that is a breach of trust, which may be regarded as a serious offence.

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4443 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...