Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hopster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Responding to PM.

Hi easy mistake to make

 

 

Yes SAR to OC, and if you haven't done so a CCA to the DCA.

 

I need clarity on Statute Barring and if I can get it I will be hugely grateful !

The Creditor or his agent has contaced me mases of times during the last six years, I have never admitted the debt and have ony made a payment of £10 for SAR which I didn't get. I have made contact thro' a solicitor but have never admitted the debt - any ideas ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I need clarity on Statute Barring and if I can get it I will be hugely grateful !

The Creditor or his agent has contaced me mases of times during the last six years, I have never admitted the debt and have ony made a payment of £10 for SAR which I didn't get. I have made contact thro' a solicitor but have never admitted the debt - any ideas ?

 

What was the nature of the contact through the solicitor?

 

The other stuff you mention has no effect on Statute Barring.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked a firm of solicitors to take on the Marlin/Egg set up to see whether the Credit Agreement was unnforcable or not

- letters to Marlin for example asked for a true copy of the CCA which they failed to supply.

 

It appears that i now have two choices

- to pay up or engage in settlement negotiations or do nothing and wait to see if they enforce the agreement that I had with Egg

the outcome of which is likely to be that the judge finds for marlin which will then include interest etc.

 

Statute Barring may be an answer

- where can I find the definitive description of Satute Barring.

 

Can you please explain why the other stuff I mention has no bearing on SB ?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a loan or credit card, Statute Barring in England and Wales is 6 years from the Cause of Action and with no absolute acknowledgement of the debt in writing. This would normally be six years from the date a payment was due but not made and after which no further payments were made. The time limit in Scotland is 5 years.

 

SB in England in Wales means that court action will not succeed as SB is an absolute defence. It is also an absolute defence in Scotland but they have the added bonus that after the 5 year period the debt is extinguished.

 

As you appointed a solicitor to deal with stuff on your behalf and they were acting as your authorised representative, whether their letters would be an acknowledgement of the debt would depend on the wording used.

 

Do you have your own thread running on this issue?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created for you hopster

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the debt still with EGG?

 

 

is it on yourcredit file still?

 

 

is the agreement enforceable?

 

 

have you sent the current owner a CCA request?

 

 

without an enforceable CCA

 

 

the current owner can do nowt

regardless to the SB status

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Now with Marlin

2. Yes

3. I don't know

 

4. Yes. the solicitors sent one and received 2 reconstituted copies of my CCA which are not identical.

 

 

The solicitors are no longer on the case.

 

 

The reconstitued agreement supplied by Marlin appears to have been constructed

using theinfo/data supplid by me when applying for the card.

 

 

This might be good enough if you take the case of Carey v HSBC where a reconstituted agreement

satisfied the court apparently.

 

 

The solicitors that were acting for me reckon that if the reconstituted agreement were to be placed

before a cout it is possible that the court would find that Marlin had complied with section 78 request

and that the agreement in enforceable - this brings int play court costs and INTEREST. !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if this is pre apr 2007 then they'll need the signed agreement

 

 

no ifs or buts

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

 

so is anyone actually chasing you?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes - Marlin - received a letter from them in August 2014 demanding outstanding amount.

 

 

Prior to this an identical letter in February 2014 and

 

 

prior to that one in August 2013

 

 

Incidentally I did NOT send an offer in May 2011 as I had originally thought (see earlier message).

 

 

I am tempted to send them a statute barred letter.

 

 

The only payment to them was £10 SAR request which was never answered.

 

so is anyone actually chasing you?

 

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

no debt this way just helping.

 

 

what is the defaulted date in the summary of the debt on your credit file?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so march next year it is removed totally.

 

 

ideally it should be the same ish date as the DN you got.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default notice from Egg dated August 2008. I don't know if there is anything diffrent on my credit file - I will see what I can find.

 

 

The Date on the Default Notice has no relevance to the actual Date Defaulted as shown on credit files, this date is the one that governs when the entry is removed from CRA files paid or not on the 6th anniversary of said date.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You said that in 2011 you offered a payment in settlement of the debt. That in itself could be construed as an acknowledgement of the debt.

 

You then say you didn't do this.....which one is it?

 

Also you need to consider what language the solicitors used when they were in correspondence....I mentioned this above.

 

You might be lucky and get away with a claim of SB but personally I would want to be sure. It would, however put the onus on them to show that it is not SB.

 

Also consider what dx has said about the enforceability aspect.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

- I did not make an offer to settle the debt

- that was another case that I am sruggling with !

 

 

I repeat I did not make an offer to Marlin/Egg/Barclaycard.

 

 

Sorry for the mix up.

 

 

The only payment made ws for an SAR for which I didn't receive an answer.

 

What is the best way of putting the onus on them to show that it is not SB ?

 

 

Is there a standard letter on the forum somewhere ?

Thx again

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an SB letter in the CAG library. By sending it you then await their reply. They will either agree that it is SB or they will not. If they don't agree they may provide their reasoning. If they don't provide their reasons then you get them to tell you why they think it is not SB.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

- I did not make an offer to settle the debt

- that was another case that I am sruggling with !

 

 

I repeat I did not make an offer to Marlin/Egg/Barclaycard.

 

 

Sorry for the mix up.

 

 

The only payment made ws for an SAR for which I didn't receive an answer.

 

What is the best way of putting the onus on them to show that it is not SB ?

 

 

Is there a standard letter on the forum somewhere ?

Thx again

 

 

 

Hopster, can you clarify which of the two dates you refer to as default date an a default notice (2008 &2009) is the default date shown on your credit files??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...