Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • The CMA’s latest monitoring report on road fuel shows that prices at the pump have risen since late January, accompanied by above average margins and spreads.View the full article
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hopster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't know how to post the agreements up on the forum site - (I know how to post them by mail but obviously have no address - great pity.

If I could post them by mail to an expert - well then the whole thing becomes good ! Can someone tell me how to post the agreements on the site ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company that I paid £495 to (also £1 for CCA))have written under my address and I have had the Egg CCA reply which I have copied and sent to the claims company. I now have my original copy of the CCA and the Egg CCA copy. I am comparing them. What differences should I be looking for ? (just in case I don't spot any)/.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Anyone out there with successs re. Egg credit card. They have registered a default against me , have so far employed two DCAs, one of which I CCAd and who retired, the other I have just CCA'd. Has anyone any good reason to believe that the Egg CCA is unenforceable ? Would anyone like to join my battle in an effort to prove unenforceability ? They cancelled my CCA when i was up to date with my payments and I have paid nothing since. I need an ally - possibly quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Hopster.

 

I'll move this thread to the Egg Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

January 2006 and i do have a copy of whjat Egg sent to me after I CCA'd them but I don't know how to post it up on the CAG site but I can answer questions on it if you ask. Thanks for the interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Hopster.

 

Try 'photobucket'............ .

 

http://photobucket.com/

 

There's a tutorial here.......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/165941-photobucket-video-tutorial.html

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, you shouldn't have to do that-if you scan it to your pc then come back here, click "post reply" then click "manage attachments" which will show below the reply box, you should see a "browse" button on the screen, click it, find your scan then click submit reply-I hope that works for you vbulletin boards tend to be the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at post #15 in this 'link'..........

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Being pursued relentlessly by Capquest for Egg ? I am and it is no fun. I have CCA'd them and they have sent me a Egg agreement.They are currently (they write) undertaking checks focused on property ownership, through the Land Registry etc, etc, and may sell the account to a specialist Debt Sale Company who will then have the legal right to pusue whatever action they may deem appropriate etc etc. I have told them that I don't acknowledge the debt and told them in writing to stop harassing me. I am wondering whether the £475 that I paid to a Credit Clear company was a complete wasteof money.

Any other Caggers in this plight ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I'll move this to the Egg forum.

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I have received a letter from Marlin which goes back via Barclaycard to my old Egg Account that was cancelled when I was not in arrears together with 161,000 others some time ago. Marlin have been sold the account. I believe that Egg did not want this account to get to court because they could have lost and therefore sold it on first to Barclaycard and then sold to Marlin. If the next step is for marlin to pass this to solicitors then I will be in the same boat as you ..........

 

Hi caggers,

 

I have received aletter from Mortimer Clarke which I originally thought was to do with an alleged Barclaycard debt but now realise relates to an alleged Egg debt.

 

The letter contains income and expenditure forms and a Direct Debit mandate for me to complete and states that if no reasonable offer if made within 14 days then they will issue a claim in the County Court. I sent a s.77/78 request to Egg in 2010 and received nothing so assumed they had no agreement form to support the demands they were making of me for payment.

 

Should I reply to this Mortimer Clarke letter and if so how?

 

Any help much appreciated. Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure that the Egg c/c was CCA compliant - I am not. Especially if you were one of the 161,000 card holders who were not in default when the accounts were terminated. I would love to have some positive clarity on this.

 

 

 

I have received aletter from Mortimer Clarke which I originally thought was to do with an alleged Barclaycard debt but now realise relates to an alleged Egg debt.

 

The letter contains income and expenditure forms and a Direct Debit mandate for me to complete and states that if no reasonable offer if made within 14 days then they will issue a claim in the County Court. I sent a s.77/78 request to Egg in 2010 and received nothing so assumed they had no agreement form to support the demands they were making of me for payment.

 

Should I reply to this Mortimer Clarke letter and if so how?

 

Any help much appreciated. Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure that the Egg c/c was CCA compliant - I am not. Especially if you were one of the 161,000 card holders who were not in default when the accounts were terminated. I would love to have some positive clarity on this.

 

Good point!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can the site team help on this one please ?

 

Might be an idea to start your own thread Hopster as you are in the middle of somebody elses.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...