Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. Pro-bono means 'free'
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Villafan -v- Barclaycard


Villafan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5491 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I first started trying to reclaim my hubby's charges in February 2007. Went through the normal route & they refunded the difference between £20 & £12 charges crediting his account with £164 as he still had an outstanding balance. Didn't pursue it any further at that time but later that year he received an offer from them & I quote

 

"Pay £1,502 which is 75% of your total balance , in a lump sum or in three instalments of £501 and we will consider your account settled in full, closed and with all the records updated accordingly"

 

There were 2 other options aswell....pay £xxx & we will credit your account with £124 or £46

 

As we had just completed the sale of our house we decided to pay the settlement amount of £1502 and received a letter confirming the payment.

 

Earlier this year I decided to re-visit my claim and thought I'd do hubby's at the same time. I re-did the schedule and sent off a letter requesting a refund of the remaining charges. They responded straightaway saying as a gesture of goodwill they have credited his Barclaycard account with a further £440. We wrote back pointing out that the account had been settled and was infact closed and asked that they issue the refund by cheque instead. They responded to this saying they are unable to issue a cheque as "you hold an outstanding balance". In my eyes this statement completely contradicted the terms of their offer so we again wrote back pointing this out to them and again requested a cheque. The 14 days has now expired & they haven't responded.

 

Can anyone help me.....do you think we are pushing our luck with this one or are we justified in pursuing it further? :-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi VF,

 

For starters, you are entitled to a full refund of each and every penalty charge, not just the difference between £20 and £12.

 

So have you now received a full refund of all penalty chgs on the a/c over the last 6 years.

 

I'm going to seek advice about whether they can keep the £440 latest refund, even after the a/c was closed with a F&F settlement.

 

We'll come back on this. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems they are doing a "Citi"

You are entitled to 100% unless they have given you a breakdown to prove their costs (which we know they wont have done)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick

 

Thanks for your response. We have received a full refund now albeit that they've credited the final £440 to a closed Barclaycard account. They are saying they can not issue us with a cheque because there is still an outstanding balance on the account.

 

My arguement is that there isn't an outstanding balance because when they offered the settlement their wording was that they would

 

"consider your account settled in full, closed and with all the records updated accordingly"

 

I'm just not sure whether to pursue it any further!

Link to post
Share on other sites

an account can't be closed unless the balance is paid off, so if like you say it was closed, then the balance must have been cleared, doesnt matter if you cleared it or they did.

 

I would wait for conformation from a site adviser, but I would think that untill you get the money in such a way so you can actually use it, you should just carry your claim on as normall. so maybe go for the lba!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi VF,

 

You must have already sent BC a Prelim Claim letter for the refund, so I suggest you now send an LBA as follows. Send it to the office that last wrote to you and keep the proof of posting.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Letter Before Action

Account No xxxxx

 

I refer to your letter of xxdate in which you refused to refund penalty charges of £440 direct to me because of an outstanding balance on the account.

 

I must disagree with your stance and remind you that you said in your letter of xxdate, "We will consider your account settled in full, closed and with all the records updated accordingly."

 

The penalty charges I am reclaiming are unlawful and I am entitled to a full refund of them. I do not have to accept you taking them as a further payment into a closed and settled account.

 

Accordingly, you now have 14 days to refund this amount to me by cheque.

 

If you fail to comply, I will issue County Court proceedings against you seeking a full refund, interest and court fees, without further notice.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

If you have to issue a court claim, you'll use a different name and address for them bt we'll d/w this if/when nec'y. :)

Edited by slick132
  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

H VF,

 

If it's not too late, please note I have now added LBA to the heading in the above letter.

 

Doh !!

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

D1cky,

 

I've already looked in, in response to a similar request left on your own thread. Send a PM rather than hijack others' threads please.

 

Thanks :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...