Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Baldilocks. Welcome to CAG. I've done some minor formatting edits to your post to make it easier to read for people on mobile. Try to keep to 1 or 2 sentences max before creating a line break in your post. It's the Consumer Rights Act 2015, not the Sale of Goods Act 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 superseded The Sale Of Goods Act 1979 and the latter does not apply as I imagine this purchase was made after 1st October 2015. Can you confirm the make, model and age of of vehicle? Some vehicles have their service history stored within the on board computers now or have it available to view online at any point. How did you pay for the vehicle? Finance (what type), Debit/Credit Card etc? I would argue, that should the above points not be correct, you would be right to claim that the goods are not as described under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.  
    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help – Bipolar Sufferer signs unregulated credit agreement!!!


joemay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband suffered a breakdown and was being treated for depression. He went out one day and purchased an expensive car with an Unregulated HP credit agreement, which was totally out of character as he had always been careful with money and hadn’t had anything on HP before.

 

A few things happened, which resulted in his GP referring him to local Mental Health Team. After many appointments with Psychiatrist and numerous different medications, he was finally diagnosed with Bipolar Affect Disorder. Psychiatrist had informed us that his uncharacteristic spending , was unfortunately, one of the many symptoms of Bipolar, and the medication he was taking for depression, had in fact, assisted/added to it. Our debt situation in more detail: icon9.gif HELP...Are there guidline for DCA's deailing with Mental Health Patients

After 6 months of having the car, HP company took it back, sold it at auction (for £20k less than the credit agreement amount), and are now looking for the shortfall. I spoke with the HP Co before repossession and asked if we could sell it privately in order to try and recover as much money as possible to pay to them, but was given a flat refusal. Just to add, I had contacted the HP company informing them that he could not afford the repayments.

 

It is fair to say, that my Husband was not in the right state of mind, and that he properly had no regard (or even read) the terms and conditions, and did not understand the consequences, as he was at an elated stage of Bipolar.

 

I’m sure, that if I asked the HP company to consider writing off the shortfall, taking all the above into consideration, that they will refuse, but as we are unable to pay, it would have to remain on £1 token payments, (as explained in original thread). I am of the assumption that they would go for a CCJ.

 

What I need advise on is :

What is the likelihood that the court would take his mental condition, at the time of purchase, into consideration?? Is it possible that they would agree he wasn’t fully responsible for his action because of his condition??

If the court issues the CCJ would the court costs be added to the shortfall balance??

Any help, advice or guidance would be much appreciated. Do you know of anyone else who has been in this position before? My husband has suffered enough, the consequences are cruel, his burden of guilt for the debt he has incurred, is overwhelming. :Cry:

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joemay,

So sorry to hear of your circumstances. I'm pretty new here myself but one of the experts will no doubt be along soon to answer some of your questions.

In the meantime, have you sent a Subject Access Request to the Hire Company yet? I would be wanting some proof of how much they got for the car.

Armed with full details of the account, including the original agreement, post it up on here and you'll get help on the best way forward.

All the best,

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joemay,

So sorry to hear of your circumstances. I'm pretty new here myself but one of the experts will no doubt be along soon to answer some of your questions.

In the meantime, have you sent a Subject Access Request to the Hire Company yet? I would be wanting some proof of how much they got for the car.

Armed with full details of the account, including the original agreement, post it up on here and you'll get help on the best way forward.

All the best,

Elsa x

 

Hi Nuse-Elsa, Thanks for responding.

 

They sent a letter stating car sold for, £12,837, shortfall is £20600. Have a copy of HP Agreement, but appears to have page 2 of 4 missing, strange as they are stapled together. Quite shocked at the figures on agreement, haven't really studied them in detail til now, all with what been going on, even husband can't believe he went for it. Car cost £25,038, they added £11,211.60 charges, plus £149 acceptance fee, plus £85 credit facility fee, total balance £36,483.60.

 

No doubt, the car was bought in auction by a large secondhand car dealer (prob, same who husb bought from), who would mark up price, then arrange HP with same HP company, who would then add on £11k charges, + acceptance fee+ etc.,).:mad:

 

Do you think I should still SAR them considering I have letter and agreement (bar page 2)? Not sure if the agreement can be challenged as its unregulated.:eek:

 

Thanks:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joemay,

I'm not qualified to comment on the interest charges etc...what do you think about them Cerberusalert?

All I can say is if it were me I'd definitely SAR them and insist they provide proof of sale price, ie a copy of receipt/ bill of sale..not just a letter from them..they could make anything up.

You could then take the full documentation to the Law Centre as Cerberusalert suggests.

Also any chance of getting a letter from your OH's specialist confirming diagnosis and symptoms ie tendency to spend in manic phase without understanding consequences etc?

There are some top notch people on here so stick at it they'll help you through it.:)

Take care,

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Elsa,

 

Spoke with OHs care worker, they would be able happy to provide statement. The debt has been passed to DCA and they are currently accepting token payment of £1 should I maybe just wait until they start getting heavy before I request SAR?

 

Would be grateful for input from others or if anyone else has had to deal with this kind of situation.

 

Thanks

Joemay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bumping up for the morning shift!

I personally would still send for the SAR..you having a copy of the agreement and them having a full, legible copy are 2 different matters, plus theres still the sale amount to query. They'll undoubtedly come back at you for more money at some stage..it's up to you whether you SAR them now or later :).

I'd take your OH's care worker up on that, get a "To whoever it may concern" letter then it's ready to copy and send when needed.

Well done, you're on your way to taking control. :)

Elsa x

 

PS...Expert comments on the (exorbitant!!??) interest and this type of agreement would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bumping up for the morning shift!

I personally would still send for the SAR..you having a copy of the agreement and them having a full, legible copy are 2 different matters, plus theres still the sale amount to query. They'll undoubtedly come back at you for more money at some stage..it's up to you whether you SAR them now or later :).

I'd take your OH's care worker up on that, get a "To whoever it may concern" letter then it's ready to copy and send when needed.

Well done, you're on your way to taking control. :)

Elsa x

 

PS...Expert comments on the (exorbitant!!??) interest and this type of agreement would be appreciated

 

Thanks Elsa:)

 

Anyone other advise would be grately appreciated.

 

Joemay

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to scan the documents, remove identifying details & post them back up here so we can determine whether the agreement is enforceable. Sometimes they do make mistakes when they draw them up, but it would need someone with the know how to cast an eye over them....although their are a few people here capable.

 

Unregulated loans are a pain in the proverbial for a lot of reasons so it would need someone with experience of them to form an opinion. That's why I suggested earlier about getting professional advice through the Law Centre, also they can address the issue of your husbands health problem with respect to the enforceability of the agreement.

 

I'm sorry I can't be of more help, but I have very little knowledge of these types of agreements & the last thing I want to do is give bad advice or raise false hopes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to scan the documents, remove identifying details & post them back up here so we can determine whether the agreement is enforceable. Sometimes they do make mistakes when they draw them up, but it would need someone with the know how to cast an eye over them....although their are a few people here capable.

 

Unregulated loans are a pain in the proverbial for a lot of reasons so it would need someone with experience of them to form an opinion. That's why I suggested earlier about getting professional advice through the Law Centre, also they can address the issue of your husbands health problem with respect to the enforceability of the agreement.

 

I'm sorry I can't be of more help, but I have very little knowledge of these types of agreements & the last thing I want to do is give bad advice or raise false hopes.

 

I totally understand what you say, not wanting to give advice, if you have little knowledge in this area. Was just hoping that someone may have had some dealings with a situation like this.

 

I will get intouch with the Law Centre and see what they can advise. I'll update the thread, just incase anyone out there in future has a similar situation.

 

Again thanks:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

CSA Guidelines advise their members (DCAs) not to take Court action where mentally ill debtors are involved as it could be used as a defence.

 

Thats interesting! I was of the impression that they make take advantage of the fact that there is a health issue, push forward for CCJ, hoping defendant wouldn't respond.:eek:

 

Thank you for that:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm keeping an eye on this thread as I am mentally ill and was that fact was previously exploited to the extent dca's told me I would lose my kids if I didnt pay. I stopped payment due to no cca response years later and they started up again with threats recently, they said you have been happily paying for years, why stop and I said I was pressured into to it and they said is that why you are needing a cca and I said yes. STILL NO CCA so will consider taking them to court for distress etc if they dont treat me with respect:-x

 

I lost a soul mate also and went downhill and hardly leave the house for fear of being followed. Another creditor has ignored letters and are threatening court action and my attitude is now dont let it make me worse court action would probably be in my best interest as it would stop dca's contacting me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, This was done to my sister who had very bad heart problems and was clinically depressed, having been told of this (with valid proof provided), they entered a ccj knowing she was in hospital and would not defend.

 

As a family we did try and have this set aside but in the end the DCA 'accepted' that no payments could be made.

 

That was 2006, has been in the hands of several DCAs all threatening to take to Court, none realising that a CCJ had already been obtained. The last one was told and we have yet to hear back from them.

 

The moral of this is to keep a very close eye on all mail sent to OH.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm keeping an eye on this thread as I am mentally ill and was that fact was previously exploited to the extent dca's told me I would lose my kids if I didnt pay. I stopped payment due to no cca response years later and they started up again with threats recently, they said you have been happily paying for years, why stop and I said I was pressured into to it and they said is that why you are needing a cca and I said yes. STILL NO CCA so will consider taking them to court for distress etc if they dont treat me with respect:-x

 

I lost a soul mate also and went downhill and hardly leave the house for fear of being followed. Another creditor has ignored letters and are threatening court action and my attitude is now dont let it make me worse court action would probably be in my best interest as it would stop dca's contacting me.

 

Have you requested the CCA with a letter or over the phone? If it was over the phone then send them the CCA request letter with £1 postal order.

 

If you have requested by letter and it has passed the 42 + 2 days then send the "default under CCA" letter. They may sit up and take notice and treat you with the respect you deserve.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you requested the CCA with a letter or over the phone? If it was over the phone then send them the CCA request letter with £1 postal order.

 

If you have requested by letter and it has passed the 42 + 2 days then send the "default under CCA" letter. They may sit up and take notice and treat you with the respect you deserve.;)

 

12+2 days ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to 42man for this link which may offer some help. Money Advice Trust - Debt and Mental Health Resources

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...