Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Done.   I wont be able to send the SAR until the end of the month for TT as I wont get paid until then and I'm a little out of pocket as its my first month working after a spell of no work. Wil that be an issue?
    • Good evening DX100   Here is a draft of my response to the court order.  I would be obliged if you could review it and avise me if I am on the right track.   Defendant Statement of Position in Response to the Order of the Sheriff   The defendant suffered Severe Depression illness almost 12 months prior to the closer of the Bank account. HBOS was made aware of the defendant illness.  A Medical Certificate dated 15 Sept 2017 was handed over to the bank as a proof. (A copy of the report will be submitted exclusively to the court review) The defendant, with the support of her ex-partner, sought a resolution from the OC regarding the escalation of her OD account, which it was mostly formed of extortionate bank charges/penalties being applied to the account. HBOS agreed to reduce the outstand OD sum to £XXX and closed the account. The defendant is confident that her ex-partner has settled the agreed sum with OC, but not absolutely certain, considering her health state at that time. She has been actively trying to reach for her ex-partner for documented evidence, but the fact that, we believe, he is a currently deployed by the UK military forces abroad and communication has been, to put it politely, very difficult due to the nature of his deployment. As the court is aware, the defendant has been trying to retrieve the data of her dealing with/from OC which it should reflect history of the above.  The defendant has already written twice to HBOS, as well as visiting her bank branch, on 01 March 2021, in person demanding the requested data.  HBOS promised to send the data to her as soon as they can. In addition to the above reasoning and contend, the defendant refute the claimants claim is owed or payable.  Due to punitive and extortionate fees the facility became untenable. Any alleged balance  claimed will consist totally of default penalties, punitive charges levied on the account for alleged late, rejected or over limit payments. The court will be aware that these charge types and the recoverability thereof have been judicially declared to be susceptible to assessments of fairness under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 The Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National PLC and others (2009). I will contend at trial that such charges are unfair in their entirety and any alleged balance was due to punitive and extortionate charges . It is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:-               a.    Provide a copy agreement/facility arrangement along with the Terms and Conditions at inception, which this claim is based on.               b.    Provide a copy of the Notice served under 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974 Demand /Recall Notice and Notice of Assignment.               c.    Provide a breakdown of their excessive charging/fees levied to the account and justify how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.               d.    Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.               e.    Evidence how they have complied with sections III & IV of Practice Direction - Pre-action Conduct.     10.   By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Same thing. The fact that you declared £4.99 means that is the extent of any reasonable foreseeably consequence. Just go for that small amount. If they cause any problems then you can have a laugh when they spend many times more than what you're claiming in order to resist you. In future, when you contract with somebody – you need to understand that effectively it is an exchange of the reasonable expectations which you create in each other by your agreement.  
    • Current situation: contacted myhermes website's robot talk about the parcel and waiting for their email response. Thanks @BankFodder   I understand that if I were going to pursue under contract law, £4.99 would be the amount that I am entitled for compensate. How about if I were going to pursue this matter under tort - negligence? Would this allow me to pursue them according the true value of the items?
    • Hi UncleB, thanks for responding. I did call them back and it appears to be hit & miss with Devitt and dependent upon which Customer service agent you get.   Spoke with a very pleasant lady and told her that I, like them recorded all calls and gave date time of call and specific time at which a green card was stipulated in order for me to take out the policy.   *Two days later a hard copy of the green card landed on my doorstep. *Free of charge too.
  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 25 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

Statute barred student loan / Credit Solution Ltd


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3996 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I hope I get some help with this.

 

A while ago I received a demand out of the blue form a company called CSL (Credit solutions Ltd) for immediate payment of several £X000 for a student loan taken out before 1998. Naively, I phoned them up and was bullied into making an immediate payment for £x and into making additional monthly payments of £x (Then confirmed in a letter from CSL).

 

A short while later they tried to take £(X+more than agreed) out of my account by direct debit. My partner (who happens to have successfully claimed back several thousand pounds from Barclays Bank for bank charges :)) immediately saw the irregularity of this. She advised that this debt is statute barred because no contact has been made since the year 2000. I was also advised that the payment I had made did not affect the statute barred status and I was not obliged to continue payments as they had no legal right to continue pressing for payment. The 'statute barred' letter has been sent to both SLC and CSL by recorded delivery. I have since received a 'postcard' from Mr White confirming that he will be visiting our address on an unspecified Wednesday and also several recorded telephone messages asking me to call them. I have then contacted them by telephone to reiterate the fact that the debt is statute barred and therefore I will not be making further payment, only to be told that it is not statute barred because it is a Government backed scheme and therefore the rules are different! I was also told that I had to prove it was statute barred. I made it quite clear I did not agree and told them that I expect no further correspondence except via letter to confirm that they would take no further action. Today I have received a demand for full payment within 72 hours, failure to do so will result in the immediate delivery of papers to the SLC to start legal proceedings.

 

The alleged loan is pre 1998 and since the year 2000 I have had no contact from the SLC, nor have I communicated with them. I have been on the electoral register in the UK for the past decade and during my last correspondence with the SLC I gave them an address for correspondence. No correspondence has been received.

 

The way these ******* have behaved has really got my back up. They have been aggressive, abusive, threatening and devious and yet when I politely called one of them a bonehead he couldn't cope and hung up!!! I will greatly appreciate any help or advice you can offer me regarding this.

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

 

WILLIAM HUGH PIERCE WILL PIERCE

Edited by kurvaface
I know YOU KNOW i KNOW YOUR READING THIS
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

hope this helps

 

The Limitation Act 1980 | Debt Advice | Payplan

 

you should send letter M found in the following link,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

I know council tax can become statute barred, but thats money you owe.

You had a loan out of puplic money,this may be different.

 

Maybe a more expierienced member will be here to advise you on this:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter 'M' sent and recieved by them a few weeks ago. For the past few days there have been none of the silly recorded phone messages.

 

Can I drop them in it for trying to take too much money from my account?

Do the apes on their phones have to have a consumer credit license? If so is there an angle there to have a pop at them? Is there a way of using the "Access rights" regulations to find out if they really have recorded the phone calls made to them and to expose their lies. As I said earlier, these [edited] have really wound me up and I totally have it in for them:-x. When this is over, I will set up a payment for the amount they want off me to this site - it would be money well spent.

 

 

 

 

William Hugh pierce

Edited by kurvaface
See above
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some more details I need to add to this:

 

The Ape I first spoke to at CSL said the loan could have been deferred until march 2004 before it became payable and was therefore enforcable. I NEVER deferred after 2000. Where does this leave me?

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is statute barred stop paying....if there is a clear gap of 6 years then nothing will unbar it....

 

Taken from the National Debtline website...

 

STUDENT LOANS

Student loan agreements are simple contracts

and this gives the Student Loans Company

(SLC) six years from the date you last paid or

acknowledged the debt to go to court to

enforce the agreement. There are two sorts of

student loans and different rules apply

depending upon when you took out the loan.

Old style student loans

Old style or ‘mortgage’ student loans are

consumer credit agreements. Payments cannot

automatically be deducted from your wages.

The SLC has to go to court before they can

enforce the debt against you. This means that

the Limitation Act can apply if you have not

paid or acknowledged the debt for over six

years.

WARNING

Asking for the loan to be deferred could

count as acknowledging the debt and start time

running again.

New style student loans

From

September 1998 new style or ‘income

contingent’ student loans include rules to say

that repayments will be automatically deducted

directly from your wages or through your tax

return if you are self-employed. This means

that the SLC are still allowed to take money

from your wages for a loan over six years old

as they do not have to go to court to do so.

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.

 

DEBT COLLECTION LETTER/SAR/AGREEMENT TEMPLATES ARE HERE - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?65-legislation

 

IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU

 

I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU

 

IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.

Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.

If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.

 

Forum rules - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to stitch them up RECORD your phone calls to them......!!!! then send them to the OFT....

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.

 

DEBT COLLECTION LETTER/SAR/AGREEMENT TEMPLATES ARE HERE - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?65-legislation

 

IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU

 

I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU

 

IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.

Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.

If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.

 

Forum rules - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

A kind person has shown me details of CSL and Power 2 Contact's consumer credit licenses. They show names of officers (Directors) whos addresses are available through the Companies House Register. Am I allowed to post them or do I have an obligation to protect their interests?:D

 

My inclination is to drop them in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't stoop to their level with actions like that.

 

I would just report their behaviour in a complaint to the OFT and trading standards.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you're right... but just thinking about the endless possible outcomes gives me some pleasure:)....:D....:smile:. I'm doing a bit of digging today on these [edited] and so far it's quite interesting. [edited]

Edited by jonni2bad
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dicovered an intersting connection between CSL and RBS. It seems that in 2005 ISIS Equity Partners invested £4.5million along with RBS as part of a £11m package in CSL.

 

Who owns RBS now?

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

Help

 

I am well out of my depth now.

 

I have been looking at the OFT requirements re companies with credit licenses keeping OFT informed of changes in circumstances. CSL has a credit license with the name of a resigned director on it from 2007. OFT says something along the lines of operating with incorrect license could result in a £50000 fine and withdrawal of license. CSL haven't ammended their license.

 

This document sets out the requirements re fitness to hold a credit license.

I would be most grateful for anyone ( SAY FOR EXAMPLE: THAT YOU WORK FOR TRADING STANDARDS AND HAPPEN TO BE BROWSING AND COULD FORMULATE a RESPECTABLE OPINION) to have a look at this and give their opinion.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/credit_licences/oft969.pdf

 

I think there are quite a few areas where CSL have fallen well short of the requirements set out in this document. I would like to incorporate this into any complaint to the OFT because the loss of Credit License would pull the floor out from under these dca hoodlums.

 

Thanks

 

 

a while later..... section 3.6 and 3.9 amongst other things are relevant parts I believe. Nigel Bridle is listed as an officer on CSLs credit license, however he is no longer, I believe, a director at CSL having resigned in 2007. I think the regulations require notification of this kind of change of circumstances within 28 days.

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to apologise for using inappropriate vocabulary in relation to DCAs. I am new to all this... still finding my feet and I have to admit my anger with these ***** had got the better of me. I promise to allow my frontal lobes to modify any thoughts from now on and I'll stick to facts only. I will also avoid any activity which may jeopardise the integrity of this site.

 

Back to business... I have received another letter today from the DCA.

-less demanding but still pressing for payment. It's logged, filed and complaint prepared for Monday.

 

I am now trying to evolve a strategy for my complaint to the OFT and perhaps an enhanced complaint to Trading Standards. This is no longer about the money.. I would like to hurt (metaphorically) the DCA.

 

The harassment issues in relation to the Administration of Justice act are clear however from reading other threads, I get the impression that a complaint on this front yields little and is not taken too seriously.

 

I would like to explore further the DCAs compliance (or lack of) with the consumer credit license regulations and see if there is an avenue for triggering a process of review of their fitness to hold a license - I have identified a few breaches not previously mentioned here. The consequences of these could be quite interesting for the DCA.

 

Also, having done a little business myself, I am always curious as to why the same directors would conduct, in essence, similar business activities through different companies. One reason is that it provides layers of protection to a director, but more obviously it muddies the waters with The Revenue. The old saying about smoke and fire really applies here... if they are behaving unlawfully in one area, it kind of follows that they probably are somewhere else too. I think a good forensic look at the Crucible group/cshl accounts and how shares are split could be quite revealing. It would be nice to get The Revenue taking the company and the director's lives to pieces (again metaphorically).

 

I am also contemplating a CCA and Subject Access Rights request but with a twist. If they are served on the Directors or the Credit License holders (and believe me, there are quite a few licensees at these companies... it's almost confusing) and they fail to comply, I suspect a complaint would have more bite.. particularly with Trading Standards.

 

Finally, I am thinking of billing them for my time dealing with their actions since they received the Statute Barred notice. I would normally expect several hundred pounds per hour for work ( I don't do too much;)) and I have spent about 25 hours with this so far. If they didn't pay I wouldn't hesitate going for a claim through the courts. Any Ideas on this?

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

My 72 hours are up...........................

 

Having gone from a position of fear when this all started to a position where I have a new hobby, this deadline is a bit of an anti-climax:cry:.

 

I am still trying to open up areas of weakness that CSHL (credit solutions holdings limited - the supposed umbrella company) has before I proceed to a full-blown complaint to the OFT. If anyone has any further ideas in relation to Credit Licenses, I am all ears.

 

I have also written to Companies House to see if there are any procedures for having Directors removed from the register. I'm thinking if it can be established that the Directors (In this case the Credit licensees in the mish-mash of companies at capella court) have been conducting business activities that are unlawful, then I am pretty sure there are some routes to go down to have the directors removed. I will update on this when I find out what the process is.

 

Is there a way of finding out how many complaints there are at the OFT about Credit Solutions LTD? I believe this information could add weight to any action against a Director at Companies House.

 

 

A short while later...... I have asked ( sorry... over the phone... ) the student loans company to e-mail me instructions as to who I should be dealing with re this alleged loan. The lady said I must only contact CSL.. and she'll e-mail that instruction to me. Interestingly when I said that the loan was Statute Barred and I would therefore appreciate them not pressing for payment, she said, "The loan HAD BEEN Statute Barred, but because I had made a payment it was now unbarred"

Am I allowed to smile?

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mailed SLC and told them where to go and on what grounds. I have also told them I will now be billing the SLC for each hour of my time that they or their goons continue to waste, also that I'll fire off updates to all the complaints I have lodged at various organisations - made me feel good anyway. Trading standards are going to get back to me any day...will keep you informed.

 

Re Credit Solutions Ltd and all the companies at Cappella Court Brighton Road CR82PG ( Power 2 Contact ltd / Credit Solutions Holdings Ltd ): Companies House only prosecute Directors for Returns violations and can strike them off and fine them £5000 for each offence but they have said that if a Director as acting in an unfit manner the organisation to contact is:

 

www.berr.gov.uk on 02072155000 which is the Department of Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

 

 

Within this organisation you can go straight to the

Companies Investigation Branch

on 02075966100. mailto:[email protected] .....will keep you informed.

Useful information: http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/cib/faqs.htm

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the licenses on the Public Register

 

 

Licence Number: 0543806

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration Number Power 2 Contact Ltd 4791083

 

Categories:

 

Consumer credit Consumer hire Credit brokerage Credit reference agency Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

 

 

Trading Name(s) (Current):

 

Cougar Financial CSL Ctrl F P2C

 

Issued Date: 08-Oct-2003

Expiry Date: 07-Oct-2008

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

 

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition David Michael Leach OFFICER Monica Rommatta Bechles OFFICER * Mr William Hugh Pierce * OFFICER Nigel Bridle OFFICER Timothy James Nash OFFICER

 

Historic Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Alistair David Smith OFFICER Brenda Stevenson OFFICER David Stevenson OFFICER

 

Nature of Business:

 

Debt Collection Other

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Correspondence Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG Principal Place Of Business Electra House, Electra Way, Crewe, Cheshire, CW1 6HZ Registered Office Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG

 

Historic Address(es):

 

Address Type Address Correspondence Alistair Smith, Scotcall ,40, Carrick Street, Glasgow, G2 8PJ Principal Place Of BusinessBarlow House,3, Butter Hill, Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 2TW Registered Office Capella House, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG Registered Office Fairman Law Accountants, 300, Kingston Road, London, SW20 8LX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

 

Licence Number: 0300314

Licence Status: Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration Number Credit Solutions Limited 2520932

 

Categories:

 

Consumer credit Consumer hire Credit brokerage Credit reference agency Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

 

 

Trading Name(s) (Current):

 

CLS

 

Trading Name(s) (Historic):

 

Contact Direct

 

Issued Date: 26-Oct-1990

Expiry Date: 28-Oct-2010

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

 

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition David Michael Leach OFFICER Derek Barry OFFICER Gordon James Wilson OFFICER Monica Ronetta Beckles OFFICER *Mr William Hugh Pierce* OFFICER Nigel Bridle OFFICER

 

Historic Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Mr Andrew Fox OFFICER Mr Brian keegan OFFICER Mr Brian Smith OFFICER Mr John Gerard Williams OFFICER Mr John Sheldon OFFICER Ms Maureen Shirley Brown OFFICER

 

Nature of Business:

 

Debt Collection

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeA ddress Correspondence Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG, United Kingdom Principal Place Of Business Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG, United Kingdom Registered Office Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG, United Kingdom

 

Historic Address(es):

 

Address Type Address Correspondence 7B, London Road, Morden, Surrey, SM4 5HT Correspondence Credit Solutions Limited, Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG Principal Place Of Business 3, Butter Hill, Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 2TW Principal Place Of Business 7B, London Road, Morden, Surrey, SM4 5HT Principal Place Of Business Barlow House 3, Butter Hill, Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 2TW Principal Place Of Business Credit Solutions Limited, Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG Registered Office 7B, London Road, Morden, Surrey, SM4 5HT Registered OfficeBarlow House 3, Butter Hill, Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 2TW Registered Office Credit Solutions Limited, Capella Court, Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2PG

 

 

 

Credit Solutions no longer employs Nigel Bridle or Derek Barry and Power 2 Contact License is expired! (correct Is being renewed). Also Officers Romatta Bechles and Ronetta Beckles Seems odd!!! Maybe they're cousins.

 

Also, on the CSA website:

http://www.csa-uk.com/csa/members-list.php

It says the person to contact re complaints at Credit Solutions is Mr Bansal, yet if you ring up and ask for him they tell you he doesn't exist.

 

This lack of attention to detail is a little bit disturbing.

I don't see Steven Dunne on this license... Is that a violation of the regualtions?

*Alpha Monkey*

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

This has just been fired off to the Companies Investigation Branch of the Insolvency Service. Obviously I can't post in its entirety, but if others do the same we could become a royal pain in the a**s to these (can't express myself appropriately).

 

 

 

 

"

I have reason to believe that a group of directors are allowing their companies to operate in an unlawful manner. I believe that they are willfully and repeatedly flouting the law and OFT guidance in relation to their business activities.

 

I think at this time of economic hardship that it would be in the public interest if the companies involved, their directors and the financial links between them were scrutinised by the Companies Investigation Branch. I believe that there are former directors who may be willing to provide an insight into the practices of these companies.

"

 

I will of course update.

 

My next load of digging will be into the share holders.. this will take a while and could be interesting.

I'm still on the case :)

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just having a look at ISIS equity partners Private Equity Partners | ISIS Private Equity Company They are involved up to their necks with Credit Solutions Ltd and Power 2 Contact Ltd as investors. They even have their own representative on the board at credit solutions (Steven Dunne).

 

I wonder what other companies they have invested in? I wonder if these partners are bottom feeders too? I like where this is going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I now know that some of the right people have seen this thread.... Please....investigate

 

Joined up

I will update info as it comes in

 

Yes... LB I am. When You get an idea of how much money these people are playing with you'll understand.

Edited by kurvaface
accuracy update
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now onto other things.

 

1) Anyone have any ideas on where I go to find out about share prices.... particularly to get an understanding of what makes them go up or down and how this can impact on their owners.

 

2) When I do a search for Credit Solutions on the web, CAG is always high up on the list. I was thinking, If I was to say, type " Tax Haven " here, and some boffin from HMRC was feeling bored and typed in " Tax Haven " on his computer, what is the liklehood of him stumbling across my thread?

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites
Shareholding Advice Needed Please - UK Business Forums

 

Derek Barry..... Another F***** on the Credit Solutions Limited credit license who no longer works there. I am so happy that what goes around comes around:grin:

 

 

Funniest thing I have seen in ages, been giiggling to myself all day:D:D:D

 

That said,the link above may be more use...If only someone on that site could ask him for more information,he may start to spill some beans. just a thought;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit Solutions cousins are listed here.

From ISIS EP

These are all businesses that I will make a point of avoiding and whose links with Credit Solutions Ltd I will expose. Some of them are suppliers to our National Health Service. Some care for our vulnerable people. Some make bike parts. All have money links to ISIS Equity Partners, a private equity company who have their own finance director at Credit Solutions Limited. I believe it is right to hold the opinion that these companies in part have been financed by "Dirty" money.!!!! :sad:

 

AIMs

Americana

Assa

Blue 8

Boldon James

Bonmarche

Brownsword

Cablecom

Care Management Group

Carnell

Country Artists

Credit Solutions And power2contact:mad:

Crew Clothing Co

CSC

Empire World Trade

Enigma Travel Group

Enotoria

Equim (formerly AITCL)

Fat Face

Fisher Outdoor Leisure

Fretwell-Downing Informatics

Green Issues

Hawksmere

IndependentLiving Services (ILS)

Kafevend

Kidsunlimited

Language line

LBM

Martin Audio

MLS

MORI

Nexus Vehicle Management

Occam

On the Beach

Panacea

Playforce

Quantix Ltd

Rarrigini And Rosso

Reach (formerly DVC Sales)

Reed and McKay

Refresco

RLA Group

ScriptSwitch Ltd

SLC Group (formerly Paragon (UK) Ltd)

SLR

Staffline

The Art Group

The Television Consultancy

Thomas Sanderson Blinds

Traveljigsaw

Tricom Supplies

Wiggle Ltd

Williams Medical Supplies

 

There maybe more that they are not so keen to be known of in the public domain. I will dig and update

Edited by kurvaface
No stone unturned
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...