Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Desperate times...


Jamhead
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I would like to register a complaint about a bank charge, that I believe to be unlawful, for unauthorised overdrafts and unpaid direct debits. I actually have a claim for refunded bank charges which has been put on hold for over a year and a half now, pending results from court rulings. However another example of unfair charges has arisen this week. I was charged £25 on monday 23/03/09 for a direct debit worth £12.23 that Alliance and Leicester paid on that day. On the same morning I had £0.00 in my account but paid in £12.50 to cover the direct debit and was still charged. I telephoned to complain and was told that direct debits are taken out at 12.00am on the day they are due, so that my account was overdrawn for 10 hours until I had paid in the £12.50. I was also told that because they had taken out the £25.00 my account was actually still overdrawn and I have been incurring £5 daily charges since then. I am currently on income support pending an appeal and am only receiving £43.00 a week. I am disgusted at the state of this and need to complain to someone; I am actually in real danger of not being able to survive any longer. I have heard there is a special claim for people undergoing extreme hardship which means they do not have to wait for the court rulings? Could someone please give me any advice possible. I am currently looking through the FAQ's sections for relevant information but am finding a lot of lengthy procedures and I need my money back ASAP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi there, i am in the same boat as you, i have asked for a refund for all charges as im in hardship, but they just keep saying have to wait and see the out come in july, but i kept on at them but i had to report it to the Financial ombudsman in the end, they have just said if i dont hear anything from A&L within 8 weeks to contact them again. A&L are trying there best not to pay up untill it goes to court, if you send any letters make sure everyone is recorded or they will say they have not received it.

 

I had done barclays bank the same time as i did A&L and i had a nice cheque off barclays bank on saturday morning as a good will gesture and have now closed my claim, they paid for half what they owed me, but i will go for the other half in july.

 

If i was you i would cancel all direct debits, or make sure money is in your account the day before money goes out, dont give them the chance of charging you more, they are the worse bank ever.

 

all the best heidi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Name

 

Your address

Date xx/xx/xx

Your Bank

Your banks Address

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Notice of Consideration for Hardship Status

Claim reference Number xxxxxxxxx

Account number xxxxxxxxxx

 

Please find attached a detailed summary of my financial standing, as evidence in support of my claim/request, be treated sympathetically and speedily in view of hardship.

In making this request, I remind you of your duty to comply with conditions agreed in the waiver of July 2007 and continuation of July 2008 between yourselves and the FSA.

I look forward to acknowledgment of this, with an undertaking that you will proceed to process it, as per the requirements of the terms agreed within the waiver.

Yours Faithfully

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Enc; Financial Statement.

Data protection act 1998.

I give my permission for you to process/use data related to me, in the course of processing my claim/inquiry to a satisfactory conclusion.

Signed xxxxxxxxxxxx Name xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date xx/xx/xx

......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... ..

 

i would also send them a Spreadsheet for income and expenditure :-

as they will only ask for one, also send copy of benefits as they will also ask for this, send it all recorded delivery.

 

Hope this helps Heidi.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...