Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

T-Mobile - when is a price plan not a price plan??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received a text notification that T-Mobile, as from 1st May, will be charging 40p per min for calling 08xx numbers. On their Flext price plans this represents an increase of 100%, for Solo and Combi plans it is an increase of 33.3%.

 

According to their own T&C, this allows me to terminate my contract a the increase is of material detriment.

2.11.2. If You are a Consumer and the change is of material detriment

to You, We will send You Written Notice one calendar month before the

terms and conditions are due to change. The new terms and conditions

will apply to You once the calendar month’s notice has run out unless

You terminate Your Agreement with Us within that notice period. If

You do this You won’t have to pay any cancellation charge that would

otherwise apply, see point 7.2.5.2.

 

7.2.4. Apart from as described in points 7.2.5 and 7.3.2 below, if You

are terminating whilst You are within Your Minimum Term, a

cancellation charge will apply. We calculate a cancellation charge by

firstly adding together all remaining Monthly Charges (or other

periodic Charges, plus any other Charges stated in the terms and

conditions for any Service) for the remainder of the Minimum Term.

We then take off 4% of that figure to get the final charge.

 

7.2.5.2. You are a Consumer and the change that We gave You

Written Notice of in point 2.11.2 or 7.1.4 above is of material detriment

to You and You give Us notice to immediately cancel this Agreement

before the change takes effect; or

 

7.2.5.3. The change that We gave You Written Notice of in point 7.1.4

is an increase in Your Price Plan Charge (as a percentage) higher than

any increase in the Retail Price Index (also calculated as a percentage)

for the 12 months before the month in which We send You Written Notice

and You give Us notice to immediately cancel this Agreement before the

change takes effect.

Not according to a T-Mobile manager it does not:-x:-x as they are arguing that calls to 08xx are outside of the price plans which means that 7.2.5.2 does not apply, nor does 7.2.5.2 as the increase is not of material detriment. I could have one of the new Flext price plans which will include 08xx from the monthly allowance but I would have to pay £40 per month, as a percentage increase this is 33.3% more than my current monthly charge. They have informed me that I can terminate early so long as I'm prepared to pay £340 in termination fees.

 

However on this page it states:

 

What were the previous call rates to these numbers?

 

It varied from 10p to 50p a minute. Flext was previously 20p a minute, Solo and Combi were previously 30p a minute.

and on the tariff pages the call charges come under "View plan details" This, to me, implies that whilst calls made to 08xx are not dedcted from the monthly allowance, they are charges for calling are part of the price plan.

 

Would I be correct in assuming that as T-Mobile are insisting that call charges to 08xx are not part of the price plans, nor do they consider the increase in charge to be of material detriment, that the contract now falls foul of the UTCC and CPUTR?

Edited by installspark

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the networks treat these numbers as calls to 'special services' and are outwith standard bundles which provide 'inclusive' calls to 01, 02 & 03 number. Everything else is fair game.

 

Now, if there was a change that they removed 01/02 from bundles, that WOULD be to your detriment and a reason to terminate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would a 100% increase still not be classed as detrimental as I make numerous calls to 08xx numbers. If it was only the odd one or 2 then fair enough but on average I make 10-20 calls per month.

 

Also T-Mobile charge different rates to 08xx numbers depending on which price plan you have ie Flext, Solo or Combi.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only time I was aware of a successful challenge was when on Orange, they differentiated charging for 0800 calls, which originally were free. There was quite an upfroar at the time, then instead of an across the board change, it was limited to certain tariffs. Those that were affected by the change WERE allowed to terminate, whilst other were told there would be a bill credit applied until the minimum term was reached.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as a point to note....

 

Whilst this is an increase in 08XX number charges for customers on some tariffs, customers with flext plans have actually been charged 40p per min for calling these numbers for months now (I can't remember the exact figure, but it's around 6 months), so if you're on a flext plan you haven't got a leg to stand on. If you're on other price plans you could try to escalate the complaint on the same grounds as the successful Orange complaints as per Buzby's last post.

 

As a final note, if YOU choose to change your price plan to a more expensive one of your own free choice this is completely irrelevant to this argument. The T&Cs re cancelling if your charges are increased only refers to when the network changes the price of a plan you are already on, thus charging you more by force.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2.11. We will make a copy of Our current version of these terms and

conditions available on Our website. We can change these terms and

conditions for any good reason, for instance, if We want all customers

on the same conditions. We will tell You about the change beforehand,

as explained here.

2.11.1. If You are a Consumer and the change of terms and conditions

is not of material detriment to You, We will send You Written Notice one

calendar month before the terms are due to change. The new terms

and conditions will automatically apply to You once that notice has

run out.

2.11.2. If You are a Consumer and the change is of material detriment

to You, We will send You Written Notice one calendar month before the

terms and conditions are due to change. The new terms and conditions

will apply to You once the calendar month’s notice has run out unless

You terminate Your Agreement with Us within that notice period. If

You do this You won’t have to pay any cancellation charge that would

otherwise apply, see point 7.2.5.2.

 

The above is taken from the current T-Mobile T&Cs. Now correct me if I'm wrong but surely it says that if a change to the T&Cs are of material detriment then you can cancel your contract within 30 days of being notified of the change.

 

I've sent my email confirming my notice to cancel however, I am intrigued to see what their reply will be

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After my formal letter of complaint went (apparently) ignored, I contacted the Directors Office, by email, to complain about T-mobile's failure to follow their own code of practice in that all complaints are acknowledged within 3 days of receipt.

 

Received a call from the Directors Office on Tuesday informing me that a member of the Customer Relations team had contacted and spoken to the password holder (me!!) on 31/03/09, and that I had agreed to the resolution and was happy to pay my bill??? WTF???? This is now being dealt with as a separate matter as this did not occur.

 

The person I spoke to at the Directors Office agreed that the upcoming increase in 08xx call charges was detrimental to me as I spend, on average, £8.00 per month calling these numbers and agreed that I was able to terminate my contract early without penalty and also receive my PAC without charge. Also T-Mobile are paying for the cost of returning the hadset by Special Delivery once the account has been terminated.

 

For the benefit of others, in the new Flext plan only certain 08xx numbers will be included in the monthly allowance and even then you may only use half of the allowance towards these charges.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...