Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

stick in the mud


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi and thanks

 

wheres the letter before action located then? is the one I posted above enough?

That links me to another cost that I cant afford at the moment.

 

Once I have posted that (if its ok) and I have received no reply, whats my best course of action, I want to get this CCJ removed. can anyone else help me?

Edited by Guidodakillapimp

Battles Completed : Balance/Settled

 

American Express/Westminsters : £3660 £1280

Lloyds TSB Current Account £500 £177

Lloyds C Card £5600 £1960

Lloyds C Card £15000 £5528

Lloyds Loan £8779 £3072

Lloyds Loan £2505 £876

Lloyds Loan £11000 £4800

 

Currently fighting = AA Credit Card & Loan, a rip off "H.I.P payment" and I have now stopped paying the BBC license fee.

:)*Dont let them grind you down*:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes thanks thats the one I looked at before.

 

I must apologise if it seems I am going over old ground, I just re-read the entire thread, I dont normally get much time to get on the forum you see and forget where I am sometimes!

 

Originally I was looking at a re-determination, but I would ideally like to get the CCJ removed and stop the payments to them, I know 42man suggested there might be some chance of this using the changes in the law as a possible avenue to pursuit.

 

I have tried many times over the phone and in writing to settle with them, but like I said, they just dont want to play ball, and now I have sent the SAR I am £10 poorer and havent made any progress.

 

So my next move is another letter giving them a further 14 days, I sent the SAR on the 25th of march 2009, heard nothing since

Battles Completed : Balance/Settled

 

American Express/Westminsters : £3660 £1280

Lloyds TSB Current Account £500 £177

Lloyds C Card £5600 £1960

Lloyds C Card £15000 £5528

Lloyds Loan £8779 £3072

Lloyds Loan £2505 £876

Lloyds Loan £11000 £4800

 

Currently fighting = AA Credit Card & Loan, a rip off "H.I.P payment" and I have now stopped paying the BBC license fee.

:)*Dont let them grind you down*:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello!

 

I have since received a statement of account, but thats it, no other details at all, so I have today sent the following :

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

Dear Sir/Madam

Loan Agreement no: 9999999999

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated 25th March 2008. However the disclosure of personal data is incomplete in this instance and I understand that other information/documents have not been provided.

1) You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges.

2) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to any legal action between you and myself.

3) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

Yours faithfully,

 

***

 

does that look ok anyone?

Battles Completed : Balance/Settled

 

American Express/Westminsters : £3660 £1280

Lloyds TSB Current Account £500 £177

Lloyds C Card £5600 £1960

Lloyds C Card £15000 £5528

Lloyds Loan £8779 £3072

Lloyds Loan £2505 £876

Lloyds Loan £11000 £4800

 

Currently fighting = AA Credit Card & Loan, a rip off "H.I.P payment" and I have now stopped paying the BBC license fee.

:)*Dont let them grind you down*:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

right, I posted the above and not heard a peep.

 

I am going to attempt to get this ccj set aside and use the argument that, I suspect either a flawed agreement in some way, or that I am unsure regarding the charges associated with the account and final amount they have listed.

 

As I have said the loan goes back to 1995 and the balance is £2708.

The bike was £6800 I think and I traded in a 2 year old bike at the time, to me the sums just dont add up they hit me for the entire cost of finance term which looks to equate to £9575, and I have been paying it for years and years, and made many attempts to settle it.

 

Am I likely to get this set aside if they dont turn up at court and the judge is having a good day? any opinions?

 

LLoyds UDT have failed to send me the original agreement that I asked for, and have failed to reply to my second letter demand.

 

Can someone please wake this thread up! :)

Battles Completed : Balance/Settled

 

American Express/Westminsters : £3660 £1280

Lloyds TSB Current Account £500 £177

Lloyds C Card £5600 £1960

Lloyds C Card £15000 £5528

Lloyds Loan £8779 £3072

Lloyds Loan £2505 £876

Lloyds Loan £11000 £4800

 

Currently fighting = AA Credit Card & Loan, a rip off "H.I.P payment" and I have now stopped paying the BBC license fee.

:)*Dont let them grind you down*:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

noone here still?

 

There all dead dave!

Battles Completed : Balance/Settled

 

American Express/Westminsters : £3660 £1280

Lloyds TSB Current Account £500 £177

Lloyds C Card £5600 £1960

Lloyds C Card £15000 £5528

Lloyds Loan £8779 £3072

Lloyds Loan £2505 £876

Lloyds Loan £11000 £4800

 

Currently fighting = AA Credit Card & Loan, a rip off "H.I.P payment" and I have now stopped paying the BBC license fee.

:)*Dont let them grind you down*:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long have you given them to respond to your last letter? to produce all the statements? Did you send it recorded delivery?

You need the information from them to determine if you can get the set aside, so their blatent prevarication needs to be highlighted

Link to post
Share on other sites

The initial SAR request was sent near the date this thread started, and the the latter request offering them seven days is now also well over due, I have given them rather a long time to reply.

 

I suspect that due to the worlds finances collapsing and with so many other people all over the uk doing the same thing! (thank gawd for the internet and these forums empowering ppl)

 

From what I can gather thus far, should I not get any reply (and I dont think I will) I can then submit a N224? to the court where the CCJ was initiated all those years ago, and argue as I said above over the possible charges (which I have no visibility on) amongst a few other options, id like to know if anyone here is of the opinion that Its worth taking a punt at, and driving it to court.

Battles Completed : Balance/Settled

 

American Express/Westminsters : £3660 £1280

Lloyds TSB Current Account £500 £177

Lloyds C Card £5600 £1960

Lloyds C Card £15000 £5528

Lloyds Loan £8779 £3072

Lloyds Loan £2505 £876

Lloyds Loan £11000 £4800

 

Currently fighting = AA Credit Card & Loan, a rip off "H.I.P payment" and I have now stopped paying the BBC license fee.

:)*Dont let them grind you down*:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well theyve had more than enough time to produce the legally requested information, what have they got to hide you may well ask.

I'm wondering whether you can apply for set aside on the grounds that you suspect charges were originally added illegally. Obviously without the info, you cant possibly know, but if anyone has further to comment we need to know the way forward for you.

If you cant apply for SA then the only option is for you to go to court, then force them to provide the info, then after that go for SA, which seems like a long winded way to go, so lets highlight this thread and see what the experts say

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you would get a set aside without this information. What you could do is to make an application to the court for an order under CPR 31 for the information to be provided. You could then go for a strike out under CPR 3.4 if they failed to produce it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...