OH v BLS/LTSB

[cymruambyth]

Paying in book has now been delivered!

[cymruambyth]

Hi letters of complaint were sent, no replies yet....... When the 33 days from when I filed a defence are up, what happens? Do I wait to hear from the court, or can I do anything pro-active?

Thank you

[citizenB]

Hi letters of complaint were sent, no replies yet....... When the 33 days from when I filed a defence are up, what happens? Do I wait to hear from the court, or can I do anything pro-active?

Thank you

 

Umm, what 33 days..

 

The 33 days are those from the issue date on the claim form until you need to put in a defence. From then on it is up to LTSB to take it forward I think.

 

The next stage will be an AQ (allocation questionairre) this will be when a local court will be allocated and you can ask for directions from the court, ie you can ask them to order LTSB to provide docs you dont have, etc.

[hunterandthehunted]

so i have plenty to look forward too:eek:

 

good luck....

[cymruambyth]

Thank you citB I misunderstood the court, I thought they meant that [problem] had 33 days to respond to my defence. So that means it is just a waiting game. Do they not have any time scale on which to act?

[cymruambyth]

h&h yes, you too can have hours of endless fun at the hands of [problem]

[iOiO]

In fact [problem] now have 28 days after receiving a sealed copy of your defence from court, to contact the court and tell them if they wish to proceed, failing that, the claim is stayed.

 

If you hear nothing (the next step, if they proceed, will be for Northampton to issue a "Transfer of Proceedings" to your local court, and you will also get an Allocation Questionaire) you can ring the court and request that they consider enforcing the stay.

[cymruambyth]

Thank you for that. I suppose allowing for the post...ha ha.....if my 28 days are up on the 10th i could rig the court at the week. however, having seen [problem] in action on this site I will probably hear from them before then.

[cymruambyth]

SRA have received complaint and will look into it........

Case transferred to local court:eek:

[iOiO]

Looks like they are pressing ahead, so its AQ's next and probabaly an attempt to get a summary Judgement... its all smoke and mirrors.... dont panic, you CAN and WILL win this.

[cymruambyth]

Thank you for the words of support. I'm just waiting fo the next stage and will be posting or advice/support.

[iOiO]

Just been looking at your "agreement" again, and if thats the clearest copy they can come up with, then they've got no chance.

[cymruambyth]

That is what I'm hoping, but I am reading up on the production of microfiche copies and witness statements.

[cymruambyth]

AQ has arrived:eek: it's N 149

[supasnooper]

Here's a few links on completing N149's -

 

Directions for N150 or N149 Allocation questionnaire - PT's guide to N149 & N150 AQ's

 

Court papers received- what now??!!**WON**CASE DISMISSED - N149 (with draft order for directions)

[cymruambyth]

Thank you, I have had a quick look, but have decided to concentrate on my other defence for the weekend:)

[citizenB]

Thank you, I have had a quick look, but have decided to concentrate on my other defence for the weekend:)

 

[cymruambyth]

Hi, having finished having a major panic I'm now dealing with the N149.

Am I rght it can be best to leave filing it until the last moment, ie sending SD the day before it is due? Also, should I send a copy to **** using RD on the same time scale?

[supasnooper]

Hi, having finished having a major panic I'm now dealing with the N149.

 

Am I rght it can be best to leave filing it until the last moment, ie sending SD the day before it is due? Also, should I send a copy to **** using RD on the same time scale?

 

Hi Cymru,

 

Yes, you can leave it as late as possible.....but please do make sure the Court receives a copy by 4.00 p.m. on the date it must be submitted by.

 

Although you are not obliged to send **** a copy, it is considered good etiquette to do so.

 

My personal experience of **** is that they do NOT send you a copy of their AQ................indeed, they filed their copy to Court 8 days late and got away with it !!

[supasnooper]

duplicate post

Edited August 26, 2009 by supasnooper
duplicate post

[supasnooper]

duplicate post.....again

Edited August 26, 2009 by supasnooper
remove duplicate advice....again.

[hunterandthehunted]

That is what I'm hoping, but I am reading up on the production of microfiche copies and witness statements.

 

cymruambyth,

i too have been reading up and finding info on microfiche copys and found out that,

in all likely hood they wont have the true original copy. do they have to provide the

original in court if it was pre 2006?.

 

intersting if they dont....

Edited August 26, 2009 by hunterandthehunted

[cymruambyth]

Hi handh

My interpretation is that it is all down to the witness statement and whether or not it can be proved that the witness was working at the time that the document was destroyed AND the vagaries of the judiciary

[cymruambyth]

Thanks supasnooper, looks like it'll be going SD the day before it is due then.

[citizenB]

duplicate post

 

duplicate post.....again

 

Surely that makes it a "triplicate" post:p:rolleyes: