Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help benefit fraud


kh41
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5422 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

a week ago i was asked to attend an interview under caution for Housing benefit, which i stopped part way through due to being nervous and unsure what to say.

 

i have had a boyfriend living with me on and off for a while and while the interviewer has not yet told me what im being accused of im assuming its about him being here ( when they said his name thats when i asked to stop the interview i saw bank statements in front of them.

 

how do they know how long he has been living here as i have had no visit so im assuming someone has informed on me.

 

my bf has all his post sent here and we have a joint bank which he usess only for his wages to be paid in as he cannot get an account, but all bills are paid by me from my bank account he pays no bills here, i last signed a declaration in july 07 and im worried they are going to accuse me of him being here since there which he hasn,t.

 

what evidence would they have ??

 

thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

time to be honest then me thinks.

else it could be a harder hit.

sadly, the bills issue etc are irrelevent.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

your alowed a boyfriend so many nights a week at your house

 

Urban myth I'm afraid.

 

Think of the long distance lorry driver who is only home at weekends, the oil rig workers who are only home every few weeks or so - they still class their home to be with their partners and not in the back of their lorry or in their bunk at the rig.

 

There is no entitlement to a set number of nights a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This area is a grey one, my daughter is an HB contractor and she said that their new system can detect where all post is sent, even mobile phone bills. You will need to provide evidence that your boyfriend has liability at another address, ie council tax, etc.

 

The LA tries to establish that he may stay two/three nights a week but he could be working away the other 4 nights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to have had a visit for them to be certain he is living there. If they have reasonable suspicion, they can actually place you under surveillence where they can be watching you (including filming you) for weeks without you being aware of it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you declare the joint bank account to them? I'm sure that if you didn't, then they will look at your statements and see this income, and assume it is yours, as it is paid in regularly, and this would affect your HB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they had my bank statments my electric bill gas bill phone bill also they had a copy of my new updated passport also noticed at the bottom of some pages it said ask.com and google i typed my name in to these search engines and my old gardening buissness came up and all the things i had added my name to over the years good luck and my down fall was not taking a lawyer with me

DVICE TAKE A LAWYER i wouldnt be going to court if i did xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Urban myth I'm afraid.

 

Think of the long distance lorry driver who is only home at weekends, the oil rig workers who are only home every few weeks or so - they still class their home to be with their partners and not in the back of their lorry or in their bunk at the rig.

 

There is no entitlement to a set number of nights a week.

 

You're right that there is no fixed number of days, but each case has to be looked at on its own circumstances. The test is living together as husband and wife (or as civil partners), so a boyfriend staying over may or may not meet this definition depending on the situation.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when u submitted your claim did u declare ur boyfreind stayed was your claim just for you .if u declared your on your own then u have what is called failed to report a change of circumstances .so u may not be entitled to benefit ie wages going in the bank ect.so your circumstances have changed to your originol claim .this i agree with no guests can stay overnight at all i think the exception may be close family members in life there are many vindictive people ur just another who they are jelous off .although you might be in the wrong here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

hi need help being accused of benfit fraud just because my boyfriend gets mail sent me he filled a form in from his old work he for got to put care of my addres on it and they said he was living with me. They just waved bits of paper in front of me all the time. Say because this bit of paper said so, no bank statements on mycar insurance. I just said l did know it was wrong. My laywer said it was fine for documents to be sent to me as he dose have a house of his own. Please can somebody help. They said that they can go into my bank account to find my car insurance dealtise but the bank said no that they couldn,t with out a court order. This went on for nearly two hours then they said to me that my body launguage was telling them that l was lying but all they had was a few bits of photocopyed papers from a local company. Nothing else l just kept saying that l didn,t know l was doing any thing wrong by putting care of my address for his care insurance and his work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...