Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap one CCA recieved today...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5474 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Cap one sent my CCA today but no sig. The CCA is on the reverse of a letter! Also included was another letter stating they had the right not to include my sig.. but surely its not legal to do this?

 

Take a peek :

caponecca1.jpg

caponeccaback.jpg

caponecca1.jpg

CCA2.jpg

caponeresponse3.jpg

Edited by tessisme
attachements not clear.
Link to post
Share on other sites

well, i am no expert and a newbie like you, but reading several other posts the document you received should be a "true copy". I havent seen any others with missing sig's. Dont worry tho' the experts will be along to sort it for you soon. Good Luck.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, i am no expert and a newbie like you, but reading several other posts the document you received should be a "true copy". I havent seen any others with missing sig's. Dont worry tho' the experts will be along to sort it for you soon. Good Luck.

 

 

I know it should be a true copy but they are stating in a letter that came in the same envelope that they are entitled to "omit" sig etc. Ah well like yourself am no expert and have read quite a bit on this site I think the next step I should be doing is send them account in dispute letter due to them failing to comply with my request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cap One have failed to comply with your request. There are none of your details on the agreement you have posted. There is a letter knocking about to send back to them saying they have failed.

I don't know when you took the card out but I bet the APR etc is at todays rates and not when you took the card out. They are bluffing you stating that they dont have to send you a copy with your signature on it.

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never had any problems with Cap One but from the posts I have read about them this seems to be common practice for them (they just don't have a clue). Just keep your head up and maybe think about reporting them to trading standards etc.

 

Sploits :p

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, As far as I know they can obscure the sig, but they have to send you a copy of the actual agreement you signed, not a blank agreement, with all the terms set out within "the 4 corners". It doesn't look like they have complied

Link to post
Share on other sites

A blank credit agreement cant act as an enforcable CCA. Send the letter off again requesting a true copy of YOUR CCA not a blank one. A blank one proves nothing

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad I found this, I asked Cap One for a copy of my CCA and got back the same as you, I also had Power2Search come round to chat to me, they wanted me to phone Cap One on their mobile phone but I refused, told them the account was in dispute and that I was still waiting for a proper CCA.

 

He has obviously told Cap One this, as I have now received a letter telling me that they are unable to comply with my request as I didn't sign the letter requesting it. They have asked me to resend the letter, this time including my signature, do I have to do this? why do they need my signature (if you discount the unethical things I am thinking of!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

under the 1983 amendment to the 1974 act they are allowed to edit out certain information including the signature, they can but do not have to send you a copy with the signature not covered up, but it must be a true copy of the executed aggreement which they would have to produce in court. if they say they need your signature, ask them why they have been sending you confidential infomation about your alledged debt if they did not know who you were, tell them if they were not sure it was you they have broken the DPA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is, they are sending out generic one size fits all agreements, with no account number or anything on it, the only place where the card/account number appears is on the covering letter. so it's not as if they are hiding signatures, there are just no details at all on the agreement that points it towards being anything to do with the person asking.

 

What confused me, is they sent me the generic one, and then only after Power2 Search had obviously reported back, they decided that they needed my signature. I think you could be right with the DPA part of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it should be a true copy but they are stating in a letter that came in the same envelope that they are entitled to "omit" sig etc. Ah well like yourself am no expert and have read quite a bit on this site I think the next step I should be doing is send them account in dispute letter due to them failing to comply with my request.

 

It's amazing what you learn on is site, like you ive had a good read as well and what an eye opener it's been, esp about DCA's and their tactics.

Sending a letter asking for a true copy of your Agreement seems a reasonable request to me, after all they should have one because if they go Legal on you they will have to produce it in the end, but take note of what a lot of other caggers say on here, only PRINT your sig, never sign it. Not that they would do anything "unscrupulous" with it of course!!

There is some chat on here about "Digital Sig's" being ok.

Maybe try that, Good Luck.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason that you should NOT sign is that it has been known for certain persons to be creative with photoshop etc and add a signature to a blank document

 

You could of course sign, but put in a non standard subtle variation which would show up on any manufactured documents.

 

Also, if they say thay cannot process a CCA request without your sig tell them nuts, there is nothing in the CCA that requires you to provide a sig and they B****** well know It !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

We had the same response to our CCA request (see my thread) and sent them an account in dispute letter, which they promptly replied to saying they had complied etc so today posted a letter to them explaining why they have not complied with my request and that the account is still in dispute, using the same regulations they refer to.

If required, will post it up for you to have a look at so you can consider sending it to them as well.

We're still newbies too, but getting lots of good help from knowledgable people and spent a lot of time on here seeing how other people respond to these standard letters they have sent out.

p.s I notice on the reply they sent you the charges are listed as £12 each occurence. Six years ago the charges were £20 per occurence and so it doesn't comply with your request because it isn't a "true" copy of the agreement at the time the agreement was entered into,,.... lol.

 

Best wishes, lets keep each other updated and through support and collective assistance we will prevail.

 

Cheers

-

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, my comments are based on information learnt or

obtained and from my own experiences.

-

Case 1 - C L Finance - Court Case 'Stayed' :-). Stay Lifted - N149 AQ Received & Filed. Case Struck Out :grin:

-

Case 2 - C L Finance - Defence Filed. N150 AQ Received & Filed. Case 'Settled by Consent' :)

-

Case 3 - EOS Solutions - No Agreement - Account Closed ~£3500. :grin:

-

Advice & opinions offered freely but informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment and seek advice from a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

We had the same response to our CCA request (see my thread) and sent them an account in dispute letter, which they promptly replied to saying they had complied etc so today posted a letter to them explaining why they have not complied with my request and that the account is still in dispute, using the same regulations they refer to.

If required, will post it up for you to have a look at so you can consider sending it to them as well.

We're still newbies too, but getting lots of good help from knowledgable people and spent a lot of time on here seeing how other people respond to these standard letters they have sent out.

p.s I notice on the reply they sent you the charges are listed as £12 each occurence. Six years ago the charges were £20 per occurence and so it doesn't comply with your request because it isn't a "true" copy of the agreement at the time the agreement was entered into,,.... lol.

 

Best wishes, lets keep each other updated and through support and collective assistance we will prevail.

 

Cheers

 

hi GD and everyone else

 

Thanks for your responses. I haven't replied yet, the account in dispute letter goes off tomorrow. I would be grateful GD if you would post the letter for future reference.

 

I agree its not a "true" copy and its cap one's kop out. :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tess,

Will post the letter up for you within the next day or so.

Hope you sent off the account in dispute letter ok.

Did they reply yet?

Best regards.

-

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, my comments are based on information learnt or

obtained and from my own experiences.

-

Case 1 - C L Finance - Court Case 'Stayed' :-). Stay Lifted - N149 AQ Received & Filed. Case Struck Out :grin:

-

Case 2 - C L Finance - Defence Filed. N150 AQ Received & Filed. Case 'Settled by Consent' :)

-

Case 3 - EOS Solutions - No Agreement - Account Closed ~£3500. :grin:

-

Advice & opinions offered freely but informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment and seek advice from a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tess,

 

The following is the letter we sent in response to the letter received after we sent the account in dispute letter.

 

Hope it's of some use.....

 

Capital One Bank (Europe) Plc

PO Box 5283

Nottingham

NG2 3YG

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number

Further to your letter dated **.**.2009, sent in response to my account in dispute letter dated **.**.2009 regarding my request under section 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I note that you have replied to the above by sending your companies current Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

This breach of the agreement can be demonstrated as follows;

As you will know section 180(1) (b) authorises, “the omission from a copy of certain material from the original, or the inclusion of certain material in condensed form.” This refers to statutory instruments made under the heading Copies of document regulations and in this care in particular to SI 1983/1557.

 

Before leaving section 180 there are two other sections that should be remembered these are:

 

Section 2(2) (a) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not satisfied unless the copy supplied is in the prescribed form and conforms to the prescribed requirements;

 

And more importantly

 

Section 2(b) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not infringed by the omission of any material, or its inclusion in condensed form, if that is authorised by regulations.

 

You will see that this quite clearly states that whilst certain items may be left out of the copy document, the rest of the document must be in the form and contain all items as prescribed by the regulations.

 

Turning to the regulations regarding what may be omitted from these copies these are contained with SI 1983/1557.

 

The regulations state:

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy-

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor, hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the Act or any Regulations there under as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancellable executed agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of signature by the debtor of an agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies);

 

It is quite clear what can be omitted from the copy document, this again asserts that all other details of the agreement should presented in form and content as required by the regulations.

 

The requirements of the Agreement regulations 1983/1553 are very explicit in describing the form and content of an agreement and this as I have demonstrated also applies to the copy of any such agreement with the above mentioned proviso.

 

Nowhere within these regulations does it state that part of the agreement can be presented on a separate document headed terms and conditions.

It does state that all terms and conditions should be within the agreement document and is explicit of the form in which it is presented.

 

I hope this explains why your reply was unacceptable I await a True copy of my agreement and would remind you again that whilst the request has not been complied with the default continues

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Cheers.... :)

-

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, my comments are based on information learnt or

obtained and from my own experiences.

-

Case 1 - C L Finance - Court Case 'Stayed' :-). Stay Lifted - N149 AQ Received & Filed. Case Struck Out :grin:

-

Case 2 - C L Finance - Defence Filed. N150 AQ Received & Filed. Case 'Settled by Consent' :)

-

Case 3 - EOS Solutions - No Agreement - Account Closed ~£3500. :grin:

-

Advice & opinions offered freely but informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment and seek advice from a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks GD

 

 

Sorry I didn't reply earlier between one thing an another lol I sent the letter off last week and they have received it as track and trace have verified it. They got till april 11 to supply it then its account in dispute. Funnily enough their phone calls increased yesterday and my son answered a couple as I was out. He quoted harrassment etc and a cap one adviser said they can call 23 times a day and he was talking rubbish!! She was reminded that the call was being recorded and she hung up then lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had this from Cap One too. It went on for a few months and they have recently sent me a signed copy of the agreement that looks ok in my eyes but I'm gonna scan up later today.

 

I just don't understand why they fobbed me off for a few months before sending the signed one

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...