Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA unenforceability


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5460 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have written to my lender regarding my loan requesting the CCA - only to be told that they are not obliged to send me a copy as I should have kept the first one I "was given" at the time of the loan acceptence.

 

Naturally, I know that they have either lost it or they think Im daft, so I replied stating the full rules that they need to comply with, and again Ive heard nothing back. The first letter was sent just after christmas and on beoth occassions they have failed to acknowledge and/or send my the required documents.

 

Question: How do I proceed from here? and...

What happned if they suddenly produce my CCA say ina few months from now?

 

Im guessing that I now (at the current moment in time) can consider this agreement legally unenforceable - but can this situation be reversed if they come up with the paperwork at some time in the future..?

 

Thought please chaps.. thanks,

 

SP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if they come up with the required paperwork in it's correct format then it becomes enforceable again unfortunately! Thats what i'm led to believe anyway, i'm sure someone else will come and confirm this!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I'm in the same situation with my bank. I asked them in October for my signed credit agreement. As far as I'm concerned I've never had a copy. They've finally admitted in February 09 that they don't have it, but I'm still liable to pay my loan.

 

Furthermore, when I originally took the loan out, I required it over 4 years, but they insisted I did it over 7 years, which I wasn't happy about, but didn't have a choice at the time. To add to the confusion,they did provide an agreement, but it was for the 4 year one which was superceded. Even that hadn't been signed by a Manager and dated.

 

They ignored all my previous letters asking for the original agreement, it was only when I didn't pay, they've finally taken notice. Can they take me to court without a signed credit agreement? Any advice would be helpful, before I write my next letter to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I'm in the same situation with my bank. I asked them in October for my signed credit agreement. As far as I'm concerned I've never had a copy. They've finally admitted in February 09 that they don't have it, but I'm still liable to pay my loan.

 

Furthermore, when I originally took the loan out, I required it over 4 years, but they insisted I did it over 7 years, which I wasn't happy about, but didn't have a choice at the time. To add to the confusion,they did provide an agreement, but it was for the 4 year one which was superceded. Even that hadn't been signed by a Manager and dated.

 

They ignored all my previous letters asking for the original agreement, it was only when I didn't pay, they've finally taken notice. Can they take me to court without a signed credit agreement? Any advice would be helpful, before I write my next letter to them

 

Hi mate, well as far as I know, if they dont produce the agreement within the correct time frame (12 days of asking) then it becomes defaulted and you are not bliged to make payments towards it and they are annot forced payments from you. They are not allowed to do anything with it!

 

BUT, yes as supasta1 says, if they DO find it and send it on (so long as it all 100% good) then you then are liable to continue with the payments..

 

 

 

What I dont get is, at what point (if the lender has admitted that they dont have it in their records) do they officially "give in" as such and acknowledge it and then write it off..?

 

SP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have written to my lender regarding my loan requesting the CCA - only to be told that they are not obliged to send me a copy as I should have kept the first one I "was given" at the time of the loan acceptence.

 

Naturally, I know that they have either lost it or they think Im daft, so I replied stating the full rules that they need to comply with, and again Ive heard nothing back. The first letter was sent just after christmas and on beoth occassions they have failed to acknowledge and/or send my the required documents.

 

Question: How do I proceed from here? and...

What happned if they suddenly produce my CCA say ina few months from now?

 

Im guessing that I now (at the current moment in time) can consider this agreement legally unenforceable - but can this situation be reversed if they come up with the paperwork at some time in the future..?

 

Thought please chaps.. thanks,

 

SP

 

Hi

 

Did you make a formal request under s77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and send them £1 and by recorded delivery?

 

If they have not complied then they are in default and cannot enforce the agreement until they have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Did you make a formal request under s77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and send them £1 and by recorded delivery?

 

If they have not complied then they are in default and cannot enforce the agreement until they have.

 

I did that previously yeh, and now the first BarcCard - are telling me that they do not have my "application" in the their records - they took 2 months to write and the second one HLFX, told me that they are not keobliged to send me a copy as I should have kept myown one at time I took the loan out!! This again was 2 months ago - SO

 

I wrote to them both today and told them they were in default as they flauted the rules and did not comply. However, where do I go from here and what exactly does it mean for me - I know they are "unenforceable" but what if the bank ignores all this and carries on as usual?

 

I requested for them to reimburse me of my payments I'd made to them over the years...!! We'll see what happens but Im not sure Im in such a strong position with it just being unenforceable due to them not sending it to me - do I need to get them to "recognise" the fact too that this is the case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did that previously yeh, and now the first BarcCard - are telling me that they do not have my "application" in the their records - they took 2 months to write and the second one HLFX, told me that they are not keobliged to send me a copy as I should have kept myown one at time I took the loan out!! This again was 2 months ago - SO

 

I wrote to them both today and told them they were in default as they flauted the rules and did not comply. However, where do I go from here and what exactly does it mean for me - I know they are "unenforceable" but what if the bank ignores all this and carries on as usual?

 

I requested for them to reimburse me of my payments I'd made to them over the years...!! We'll see what happens but Im not sure Im in such a strong position with it just being unenforceable due to them not sending it to me - do I need to get them to "recognise" the fact too that this is the case?

 

A few questions on this one........

 

When was the loan taken out?

 

Why do you think they have flouted the rules?

 

What rules are you referring to?

 

The debt still exists but may or may not be enforcable and this is usually decided by the court.

 

BC will have probably sent you a template agreement and set of T&C's which will satisfy the provisions of the CCA 1974. Mercers will have a go and then the debt will probably be sold on. It may take a few years before they give up or litigate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI -thanks for getting back.

 

OK - BC 2001 took the card out. Missed 1 payment - not being chased as such. Requested agreement in Dec - heard back in Feb saying the they "dont hold a copy of my application in their records" and that was it - nothing else. So I sent a letter today claiming that the account was now in dispute as they have not provided me with an agreement or in fact anything within 12 days - it was 2 months before I even go that respsone letter !!

 

I took out a HLF loan in Nov 2007 which was a top up from a loan with them from Feb 2007 - they told me after writing back after about 5 weeks, that they are "not obliged to send me any agreement as i had one to start with and should have kept it".

 

I told them as they have failed to comply with the Act where requesting agreements is concerned, they are now in default.

 

I've probably overstepped the mark somewhat but I'll wait and see what the replies are..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well the bank have finally admitted in writing that they don't have it and that they can't pursue me for the money, under the CCA I wrote them a letter based on templates from here (thanks everyone - most helpful).

 

The latest letter I've sent is to ask them to remove the default from the credit ref agencies. Surely if they don't have my signed credit agreement, they don't have permission to use my data with the credit ref agencies?

 

They've also started to phone and hassle me, but I told them I'm not speaking to them verbally, they have all my letters (which have all been sent recorded delivery and have all been replied to) and to refer to them.

 

I'm hoping this nightmare will end soon, it's been going on since last October

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to soon Monty, I have today received a default notice and that they will take action to recover the debt. They ignored my last letter completely. To make matters worse, how can they try and take payments from my bank account which I closed with them last year? They are fully aware of this because I was paying them from my new bank account. Anyway charges have now mounted up, they've also sent a default notice to recover the amount of charges they have decided in their wisdom to apply to my "closed" bank account. Are they allowed to do this?

 

I think it's getting serious now, is it worth contacting a solicitor or just keep persevering with letters etc?

 

Any help would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought that the solution if they can't or won't produce the CCA - do a CPR 31.16 letter - then when they don't comply make an application for an Order and if they still can't find it bring proceedings for a declaration of unenforceability under s142 of the consumer credit act. Assuming that they don't find a valid cca before you get the declaration then they are stuffed.

 

I think the approach to adopt is to accept that there is an agreement BUT argue that it was never reduced into writing or if it was that it does not contain the prescribed terms - certainly for cases under the old S127 (3) unless they can produce a signed agreement containing all of the prescribed terms they're stuffed - unfortunately the newer agreements aren't that clear cut

Edited by I've got no money

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took out a HLF loan in Nov 2007 which was a top up from a loan with them from Feb 2007 - they told me after writing back after about 5 weeks, that they are "not obliged to send me any agreement as i had one to start with and should have kept it".

 

That is so funny! At first I didn't believe they had said that, but, it must be true - you couldn't make up stuff like this.

 

But, the thing to remember is, following the introduction of the 2006 CCA a lot of these defences concerning unenforceability for loans taken out more recently have disappeared.

 

I would suggest that it is very likely that they do have a signed agreement in existence. In order to check I would suggest you send them a sar and specifically request to see it.

 

Of course, what I've got no money says above is always worth doing as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to soon Monty, I have today received a default notice and that they will take action to recover the debt. They ignored my last letter completely. To make matters worse, how can they try and take payments from my bank account which I closed with them last year? They are fully aware of this because I was paying them from my new bank account. Anyway charges have now mounted up, they've also sent a default notice to recover the amount of charges they have decided in their wisdom to apply to my "closed" bank account. Are they allowed to do this?

 

I think it's getting serious now, is it worth contacting a solicitor or just keep persevering with letters etc?

 

Any help would be much appreciated.

 

Do you have a final statement from the bank, showing "account closed", you should have, if so, they are stuffed on this one!

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, I had "paperless" statements, but they are fully aware that I closed the bank account. I rang them a few times to check, I've had several run in's with this bank. The way I've been treated is appalling. And, now they have the nerve to take bank payments from an account that they can clearly see is zero and then charge me for the priviledge. This can't be right. Will the Financial Ombudsman help?

 

I'm writing another letter regarding the Credit Agreement, they've admitted they can't enforce it, but are continuing to to deafult me with the CR Agencies, which they can't, because they've never had my signature to allow them to do this. Going to stick to my guns and persevere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No, because I don't know how to start one

 

Also my bank have admitted that they don't have the agreement and will not enforce it, because there's no proof of the loan in the first place.

 

However, they are continuing to place a default against me, can they do that without an agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...