Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital Finance One/Payday Credit - Anyone else used them? -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 364
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah CFO have taken £100 out of my "Parachute" account in transactions of £25's last night

 

How on earth they got my other account i do not know.

Ive read there T&C's and it says nothing about taking money from a account before or after the date agreed and it says they will take money from the account the user nominates.

 

So how they have gotten other accounts i dont have a clue.

 

Ill also get incontact with OFT and hope you do to!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the other account was with the same bank that is how it has happened, it should be with a different bank.

 

This is THEFT so you need to get a crime number from the local police, tell them you need the crime number to claim on the insurance and so the bank can instigate a fraud investigation.

 

They CANNOT take money as and when, you agreement is for X amount on X date, they have now breached their own terms and conditions and you can write and tell them so. Go through the T&Cs and write down each one they have breached.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must be getting desperate to be raiding other accounts on Xmas Eve !! That's just evil :mad2:

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed them this morning stating that they have breached there T&C's and that i never gave them permission to use the Natwest details (dnno how they have it) and it states in the T&C they can only use the card i nominate.

Also only states that they will try to take the funds on x day for x amount, not before or after and if they dont get the payment it doesnt say they will try to take more money.

 

24/7 Moneybox however also do the same thing but have it in the T&C's so im not sure if its legal or illegal for a PDL to take money at will after defaulting?

 

If the other account was with the same bank that is how it has happened, it should be with a different bank.

 

This is THEFT so you need to get a crime number from the local police, tell them you need the crime number to claim on the insurance and so the bank can instigate a fraud investigation.

 

They CANNOT take money as and when, you agreement is for X amount on X date, they have now breached their own terms and conditions and you can write and tell them so. Go through the T&Cs and write down each one they have breached.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you applied to another PDL company and entered your Natwest details ? Or entered the Natwest account no on the internet at all ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i did, Wonga becuase i have a repayment plan with them and they said they will only accept via DD on there website, so i changed details to that and i changed my DD for my mobile phone contract.

Otherwise thats all.

 

But as far as i recall my mobile phone only wanted the long digits not the sort code or account number, not sure if that makes a difference?

 

CFO comes up on my statement as a debit transaction not a direct debit.

 

Have you applied to another PDL company and entered your Natwest details ? Or entered the Natwest account no on the internet at all ?
Link to post
Share on other sites

They all pass bank information between each other - you'll never get them to admit it though, but time and time again we have seen bank details given to one PDL company suddenly used by another.

 

You should inform the Natwest Fraud Team - they are pretty good. I know it's a bit late now but you could try phoning to see if they are working 24 hours. Usually if you inform them on the same day as the transaction it can be back in your account in hours.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i did, Wonga becuase i have a repayment plan with them and they said they will only accept via DD on there website, so i changed details to that and i changed my DD for my mobile phone contract.

Otherwise thats all.

CFO comes up on my statement as a debit transaction not a direct debit.

 

^^So it will be a point of sale/PDQ transaction

Hate to tell you this BUT Wonga's bank details are all over this site and placed on their own website !!! you shouldn't need to be in the position to hand over detailsSorry to dilute this great thread on CFO

Happy to share my experience but for your own protection, please check and double check what myself and other Caggers inform

...

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence.”

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an article on PDLs from the Daily Mail, misses the point as usual and advises people to go to CAB, which as we know, don't offer anywhere near the level of advice needed to deal with these people.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/cardsloans/article-2079767/Debt-experts-warn-financial-trouble-Christmas-seek-help.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you should definitely inform the OFT - CF1 need to be hauled over the coals for using bank details that they have never been given by the custoner - they should be made to disclose where they got the details from.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just applied for a loan with cfo and then decided to check up on them (stupid i know) i am now waiting on a response from them to say whether i have been approved, now panicking after reading these messages, do u thinki it wld be a good idea to call my bank and stop my card and apply for a new one??

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will do this now, stilll thinking of cancelling my card though just incase they try and take anything, by the sounds of them taking money from peoples accounts that isnt theirs os exactly what they do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi its me again..

ive been reading posts about CFO couldnt sleep through thinking of rolling over the loan even though i have paid 59.83 part of my repayment propsal.

One message said that cfo are in trouble is this true??

Has anyone on these boards been sucessful in setting up a repayment plan because cfo are not budging with me, hence i just wish i could pay the 351 i owe them and sleep.. any answers greatly appericated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know Daisy, I shouldn't imagine so the payday loan seems to be big business in today's climate

although it is a small company and what you don't know is they probably rely on people's roll overs each month

 

With your sleep prob, can you go and see your GP tell them the truth (why your not sleeping) and they may be able to give you something short term to see you through (I done the same best thing I could have done)

 

Did you make the complaint in writing to the company?

Have you spoken to the Oft, Trading Standards/Consumer Direct, British Cheque & Credit Association?

 

From my own bitter experience it takes WEEKS to be settled you will need a little patience

The only thing is I think someone else is behind what happens - couldn't help get the feeling the matter could only be resolved in complaining.

 

Try not to take it personally - your around friends on here that have once been there x

Edited by asmilecostsnothing
add

Happy to share my experience but for your own protection, please check and double check what myself and other Caggers inform

...

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence.”

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have complained to oft who have noted my complaint i have sent CFO another email just plending with them to accept my proposal but that was last night so not sure when i'll hear from again..just so worried about the fines and charges and that my loan will get out of control. thanks for replying a smilecostnothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi its me again..

ive been reading posts about CFO couldnt sleep through thinking of rolling over the loan even though i have paid 59.83 part of my repayment propsal.

One message said that cfo are in trouble is this true??

Has anyone on these boards been sucessful in setting up a repayment plan because cfo are not budging with me, hence i just wish i could pay the 351 i owe them and sleep.. any answers greatly appericated.

 

Your mistake daisy is that you are 'asking' them. When you have worked out how much you can afford, and be realistic, don't make it so high that you will miss a week, and then you send them a payment for that amount and 'tell' them that is all you can afford and all you will send and just keep that payment up each week despite what their whinging letters say.

 

You can't go to prison for being in debt, it's not a crime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CFO are being reported to the OFT a lot, that is the 'trouble' being reffered to, it isn't trouble in any other way except they have a very harsh collections policy, they should have a very harsh dishing out policy too.

 

I did the sums recently

 

If they have 1500 to give out to 100 people a month and everyone rolls over for one month in two months that 1500 will become 3000+

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite a remarkable business model, isn't it? Especially since not one person I know who has taken a PDL (and it surprises me how many there are in my family/friends circle alone) has ever had a loan that they have not rolled over at least once. A few of them are lost in an endless cycle of rollovers and re-loaning. I have one friend who I've just convinced to open a new bank account who has paid out over £1000 in rollovers, fees and interest in the last 12 months without ever touching the capital amount. Despite what I've told her, I know she'll pay them every penny they ask for when she defaults, because she feels responsible for getting herself into such a mess and she's too scared to negotiate.

 

Then you can add to that the profit from their spurious fees. Yesterday I saw a post on here from a chap who's girlfriend had taken a £150 loan which now stands at £1000+. If these people were walking round with that cash in a plastic wallet and handing it out on a council sink estate, people would call them what they are.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...