Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ex parte injunction against log book loans - and you can do it too


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3863 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK here we go again. Any insulting posts will be edited and any off topic posts will be moved to the bear garden.

 

EDIT: This post makes no sense now as I have moved 4 posts to the BG.

Edited by freakyleaky
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Good and fast thinking, well done and good luck. :-)

 

Let us know how you got on!

 

Sending good vibes to you. :-)

 

hI

I have had problems with Lbl and they have finally got my car and say i have 7 days to pay £8,540.45. Do you think i could also go down this line, the problem is that i only have 4 days left.

l WOULD BE GLAD FOR ANY INFORMATION

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice, i do have soloicitors on it but i am worried that they won't be able to stop the sale in time.

If i get this ex parte injunction, would i have to take it to their office in putney London, as the car i think is being held in Enfield London to be autioned off"!! I only know this because i thought it was stolen and was told by the police that lbl have it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jf uk go to the supreme court in london and request a search on your name give them a date you signed the contract with lbl and check that the bill of sale was registered. (within 7 days of you signing) this will only cost you a fiver for a copy if you go in personally room e17 at temple high court. do this asap it will help you big time in court for your injunction if they registered late or not at all. good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice, i do have soloicitors on it but i am worried that they won't be able to stop the sale in time.

If i get this ex parte injunction, would i have to take it to their office in putney London, as the car i think is being held in Enfield London to be autioned off"!! I only know this because i thought it was stolen and was told by the police that lbl have it.

 

The injunction can be process-served on all parties - LBL, the agents & the auction house if need be - and such inunctions are always served by court bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to go to the closest court to the office of lbl that you dealt with..or where the car is being kept....when i got my injunction the judge got me to serve it on mm.. the only reason i am telling you to check the bill of sale is if it is not valid the judge will be more in your favour.. but as fleeced said earlier get moving on it...dont waste a day!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes..unfortunately i don't qualify for leagal aid, so they are looking to see what else they can do..It doesn't really look hopeful, i have read some other replies and a few peopl have said that there cars were sold within hours. I have received an early settlement calculation letter which says

when i took the loan out, and how much i owe..

Thats about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JF, the only delay you can come up with I guess is t say that you are going to pay for it, tell them that you are sending a cheque, I know from some people this trick has worked well, this should give you a little more time for your injunction application.

 

Only thing I would say tho is I am not aware that there is such thing as a Bill of Sale being registered late, at court we do not register anything with out a reasonable answer, the master will normally use his discretion if he believes there is a genuine reason that the BoS was being presented late, I know we charge a fee for late registeration, the court cannot just register a late BoS for the sake of it.

 

Did you have an expensive car ? it certainly sounds it if you owe 8k.

 

Come back and let us know.

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been sent a letter from lbl and they intend to sell it.. The loan was for £3k, the £8.5k they are asking for is intrest and default letters, calls, etc...My car was a mercedes..

They have told me i can collect my belongings that was in the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is the case, then I cannot comprehend why on earth you aren't following Frustrated's lead and going for an immediate ex-parte injunction that would prevent sale of the car and it's likely return!

They will flog your car for peanuts and then carry on their relentless pursuit of the gargantuan and unlawful charges they have applied to your account.

The Judge will not think "They are entitled to loan payments, charges AND THE CAR", he will think "This must be halted and explained in a Court of Law"

Do not underestimate just how many other cases against these crooks are currently going on in the Courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

fleeced ...as a matter of intrest have just checked section 8 of bills of sales act 1878 ammneded act 1882 unless bill of sale is registered in 7 days of signing it is unenforceable and void..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been sent a letter from lbl and they intend to sell it.. The loan was for £3k, the £8.5k they are asking for is intrest and default letters, calls, etc...My car was a mercedes..

They have told me i can collect my belongings that was in the car.

 

Having seen the above post I realize this may be closing the stable door after the horse has bolted but For gawds sake DON'T post any info on this or any other thread/site which can identify you such as make of car, value of loan or amount claimed by LBL to be outstanding otherwise cos they trawl these forums & they'll be 1 jump ahead all the time

 

Do as advised seek an ex party injunction to stop them disposing of the car & even returning it to you. If you don't follow the advice of those who have been there, done that (eg Fleeced) then you'll lose the car.......period

Link to post
Share on other sites

fleeced ...as a matter of intrest have just checked section 8 of bills of sales act 1878 ammneded act 1882 unless bill of sale is registered in 7 days of signing it is unenforceable and void..

 

Correct but the High Court will allow late registration provided theres a good reason

 

Now as the person affected if you know of no reason as to why it should have been registered late then you may wish to mention this to the court in any subsequent litigation;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Depressed,

If dear old LBL are so fine then why are they paying people off rather than face their business coming under the microscope of a court trial? And I am not talking about dropping a few charges here and there, I am talking about umpteen examples of paying thousands out to those who dare to trouble the courts and challenge these sheisters.

Also, to correct you on a point; to "hand the car back" would mean that LBL had some previous possession of the particular vehicle. As regular viewers to this forum will have twigged, the cars are secured by a Bill of Sale, a legal document that requires (as do all legal documents) full explanation before signing - that explanation is never offered with your beloved LBL rendering it all somewhat dubious.

Furthermore, most of these posts are made by people who, yes, had their loans from LBL - however most have also paid LBL a damn sight more back than they borrowed and are still facing unlawful seizure of their vehicles by these sharks

Edited by freakyleaky
Removed quote from moderated post.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Fleeced73, you have posted deeply libellous comments which I suggest you withdraw.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharks are noble creatures which only hunt when hungry and do not deserve to be associated with the behaviours you describe.

 

 

 

:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BW don't you think such remarks should have been made via PM rather than on the open forum..............or are you trying to prove something. Libellous or not I find it deeply offensive that someone, who isn't a mod, should chide another member who I know for their comments

 

If you are anyone else is unhappy with a post they, like you have a remedy,.......report the post by hitting the triangle & let a mod decide

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

Read it properly it was a JOKE, specsavers appointment, but typical, feet first knee jerk reaction.

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

BW don't you think such remarks should have been made via PM rather than on the open forum..............or are you trying to prove something. Libellous or not I find it deeply offensive that someone, who isn't a mod, should chide another member who I know for their comments

 

 

If you are anyone else is unhappy with a post they, like you have a remedy,.......report the post by hitting the triangle & let a mod decide

 

1053.gif

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...