Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5504 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi there not sure i am in the right place but if anyone can help i would appreiciate it.

 

I have a business which has non regulated hire agreements on about 8 vans and cars. I paid a lot of cash up front as the first intsallment for the vehicles and then the agreement was to pay by 23 monthly installments for the hire. The agreements started 07/07/08 and end 07/07/10.

 

Not one month has been missed.

 

The company i hired them off and whose name is on the agreement has gone bust...into liquidation and the insolvency company dealing with it has instructed bailifffs to come and collect all the vehicles and the bailiffs are claiming they have a note for repossession.

 

I would like to know wether this can be done given that i agreements and also i have no copies of the t & c on the back of the agreements to check wether they can do it.

 

any advice would be gratefully appreciated.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Angelsmile

 

this is happening more frequently than you would imagine - car and van rental is a risky business!

 

Your situation and outcomes is one of two scenarios:

1) You have signed a flexible leasing agreement with the hire company, detailing the two year payment plan and the deposit amounts etc. The document must conform to the Road Traffic Act to actually be legal (Most hire agreements are only available up to a limit of 180 days, yours must state it is for a longer period). You are more likely to have entered into a flexible lease if you have taken out your own insurance policy(ies). If you are using the hire firms insurance then in all probabilities you are not on a flexible lease.

 

2) You are spot hiring the vehicles, and although you have paid the deposit up front and signed what looks like a two year deal, in fact it will be rolling over every month or so and renewed at the hire firms end. This sounds more likely, especially as you say you haven't signed agreements which is very unlikely for a flexible lease.

 

If 1) applies then you are fine. The administrators/liquidators of the hire firm have an obligation to honour existing contracts, or buy you out. You have signed a two year deal, and the vehicle is yours, providing you keep up your end of the bargain and pay promptly etc, they can't take it back. Most hire firms have their vehicles financed, and it is that finance company who is now seeking to repossess the vehicle - if 1) applies to you contact the administrator or finance company and explain the situation. They will allow you to see out the term of your agreement if you are paying promptly - effectively they take over management of the contract you had with the hire firm.

 

If 2) applies you need to return the vehicles immediately. If the hire firm has only spot hired the vehicles to you, they are not yours to retain and at any time the hire firm, the liquidator or administrator, or court order can take the vehicles back. As the firm is bust you are unfortunately unable to claw back your deposit - the monthly payments you wouldn't get back anyway as you have enjoyed the use of the vehicles.

 

If 2) applies you should contact the adminstrator and register yourself as a creditor and see if you get anything back. If at a later date you can show the hire firm gave you the vehicles in bad faith - ie. they took the deposit off you when they knew they were going bust soon - you may be able to get the police involved against the proprietors for wrongful trading, but this is always a longshot.

 

If 2) applies and you take the view that you'll keep hold of the vehicles and just not pay the monthly installments until you have recouped your deposit, then be warned that if the company is in adminstration/liquidation the court dealing will authorise repossession orders / return of goods orders and the police will pull you and your drivers over as they will show up on the lost and stolen register. You would not be able to plead ignorance as the repossession agent who has been in contact with you will inform the court of this. Ordinarily the police don't get involved in repossessions, but when a company is going through the insolvency courts the judge can order the vehicles as effectly being 'stolen'.

 

 

I hope for your sake its option 1, but if its option 2 then I'm afraid you've probably been burned.

 

 

Regards

 

Rental Company

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there....

 

thanks very much....i do have contracts for all the vehicles but on my copies the agreements have not been signed.

 

The title of the agreement is Non-regulated hire agreement.....it then says...this is a vehicle hiring agreement made between us .....having our registered office at........and you the person(s) identified as hirer below.

 

It has the make , model, reg, chassis no, engine no etc detailed.

 

Then says...period of hire: 24 months commencing on the 8th July 2008 and ending on the 7th July 2010.

 

Then says ...Rentals: A first rental of £....(inc vat) payable on the date of this agreement followed by 23 monthly rentals each of £...(incl vat) commencing 1 month after the date of this agreement.

 

Then asks about maintanence included....which we dont...gives excess mileage charges...

 

Then a final box with a summary of payments and vat

 

Then the signature boxes.

 

I have our own insurance through Axa and not the lease company.

 

Any further assistance would be great before I contact the administrators.

 

thanks ever so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again....im getting a bit confused....i thought it was the administrators who were trying to recover the vehicles....however i have just realised i have not heard from the administrators and it is a debt collection co who are working on behalf of barclays who are trying to collect the vehicles. I assume they have financed the vehicles and this all makes sense now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

 

sounds about right. Barclays will now know the rental firm is in administration and under their finance agreement with the rental firm they are entitled to end their finance agreement and recover the vehicles. HOWEVER as previously stated the contract you made with the hire firm still stands and either needs to be honoured, or you need to be bought out - ie have your deposit returned.

 

Now you know who you are dealing with contact both the administrator and Barclays and explain your situation. You'll need to fax both copies of the lease agreement, and put a covering letter proposing to either carry out the contract to the end, or return the vehicles subject to getting your deposit back.

 

Barclays have a good legal team you can contact, there asset finance office is Churchill Plaza, Basingstoke. contact numbers can be googled.

 

You can try talking to the repo men as well but as they are not Barclays employees they only get paid if they recover the vehicles so they probably wont be interested in what you have to say.

 

Let me know what the administrator says, but legally speaking the contracts entered into by the hire firm before going bust, be it customer contracts, employee contracts etc are still live but are being administered by the court, and it is them that have to sort them out.

 

Again sorry for your inconvenience you have suffered, its a bit like the people who rent and then haev their landlord get repossessed and they get kicked out.

 

Finally meant to say earlier the repossession agents are not bailiffs and you need not assist them in any way if you don't want to. They are contractors working on behalf of Barclays and if you choose not to help them then that's your choice. If however at some point the court orders you to return the vehicles then you must comply otherwise you could be jailed for contempt of court.

 

Please keep me up to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again...

 

right i spoke to barclays today and they are not interested in doing a deal i.e taking over the contract...nor are they interested in the fact that i have paid a deposit and have a contract and said they will get a court order to get the car back. I am going to write to them tomorrow and the administrators just so that i have something in writing to prove i have corresponded with them. They are no interested in any vehicle excpet a jag that I have. I told them i had lost a deposit and they said they ahd lost a lot more and want to recover some of the money.

 

Any ideas on what to do next would be great...

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello again

 

your contract takes precedent over the administration of the company and barclays. You either need to be bought out or run the contracts length. Barclays do want to cut their losses and liquidate the vehicles immediately as it draws a line under the matter, but you still cannot be bullied around. I would recommend going to a solicitor and asking them to write a letter on your behalf, will cost around £100 but will be money well spent if you get to keep the vehicles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi you...i did just that and have hidden the car for now. Letter was faxed last thurs to barclays and administrators and had no response yet. Fingers crossed

 

thanks for all your help...will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again.....i have had an email from barclays and would really appreciate you looking at it and gioving any advice. I have not stated at any time to them that i am hiding the vehicle and I have no terms and conditions attached to the contracts as they are asking for. i am not denying they have title but am disputing the fact that the first month payment was in fact a deposit. I am going to write back today and ask for bank details to pay this months rental and say reinterate the fact that i want to keep the vehicle and pay for it or they give me some money back for it.

 

Here is the email....

 

We are in receipt of your letter dated 12/3. Please provide a copy of the terms and conditions associated with hire contract number 5525.

We would observe as follows:

- We have title to the vehicle.

- The first rental of £2816.48 is not a deposit.

In light of your clients' stated intentions of hiding the vehicle we have placed the vehicle on the security register with HPI, and are reporting it stolen to the police.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Kind Regards

 

any advice greatly appreciated.....thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello again angelsmile

 

The first payment you made is such a large amount it is hard to see how Barclays or anyone else could reasonably assume it is anything but a deposit.

 

I would try and find the documentation, and definitely get your solicitor to write a letter to Barclays.

 

The HPI register alert is only there to flag up the vehicle if you try to raise finance against it or you try and sell it and someone checks on the register. Barclays do hold title to the vehicles so in theory can register them as stolen.... BUT here's the kicker. Go to your local police station tomorrow, take all the paperwork you can relating to the agreements and the hire firm going bust, and explain that at the moment you are trying to negotiate with Barclays and the administrators. Explain that the vehicles are insured under your own policy (take the certificate) and that the vehicles have not been stolen or lost, and that the issue with Barclays is completely civil and not a case or criminal theft. Tell the police to make sure that your statement is attached to the police national computer, so taht if B does report them as stolen, its flagged as a civil dispute and that they aren't actually stolen.

 

Write again to barclays explaining what you have done, quote the police reference, and state that you believe it is triable issue, ie. it needs to be decided by a judge. Again you should discuss this with your solicitor.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you very much i will do that. i am so grateful. Have not heard from barclays since i sent them an email last week asking for the bank details to pay this months rent.

 

will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...