Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please HELP Car Lease Company in Liquidation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5525 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am new to this forum but hope you can help.

 

Last year (July 09) I took over a lease as a favour to business aquiantence, who had sacked his employee. The lease company - Goldrolls sent the forms, which were changed from a company lease to a private one through e-mail, however no Terms and Cnditions were sent - despite numerous requests. Foolishly, I paid the 12 months lease upfront instead of by mobnthly installments (to the end of June 09) and hey ho the lease company have gone into liquidation and want the car back now.

 

Do I have to surrender it as I havent breached any terms - although I never received any.. In fact I have paid in full and this amounts to over £1600. When I informed the company, they said sorry but the bank owns the asset and wants it back.

 

I really dont know what to do. Please help if you can

 

Jayne

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would want to look very carefuilly at the T&Cs but my starting point would certainly be to hang onto the car and to drive it until they forced you to give it back.

However, what about insurance?

 

I've just noticed that no T&Cs were sent.

I think that you should get a set out of interest but you will be able to argue that they don't apply to you.

You only have 3 months or so to delay things until the agreement runs out. If the vehicle is taxed and insured then it shouldn't be difficult to make sure that any court action for the car's retrun is drawn out to then.

 

Start off by using delaying tactics in your correspondence. Delay in replying and then reply with questions which require further answers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm tricky one!

 

I would be inclined to force the banks hand, and state that you are using right of offset, to offset the vehicle against the money owed to you due to the cancellation of the contract. However, I am not sure how legal this actually is.

 

You can certainly give the car back and then join the list of creditors under the administrators - but chances are you will never see a penny.

 

Others may be able to advise better, I assume there is some way to leverage the fact that you are in possession of an asset of the company to ensure that you get your money back.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for that, I agree in fact they have just rang actually, again I stated that I will not give up the car until the end of the term unless they refund the money I have paid.

The car is insured fully comp by me personally and I have also just had a full service completed and 2 new tyres. Unfortunaltely no T&C's

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was their response?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the collecting agents on behalf of Barclays not receivers -sorry. They have told me that if they dont collect in 2 weeks then the car will go on to the stolen register!!

 

I have had nothing in writing from Barclays nor the collection company, as I said to the guy on the phone, he could be anyone trying to get me to hand over something. I also said I want written notification, together with a document explaing what is happening and against what clauses in the contract, signed officially by Barclays.

 

Obvioulsy I am a creditor to Goldrolls and not Barclays who own the car, so handed it back means I lose out. My worry is if it is regiseted on this stolen list and I am pulled in by the police what then.I could always take the wheels of it and park it somewhere other than my driveway!!

 

Oh what a nightmare.. Thanks again in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so....the leasing company themselves do not actually own the car?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MrSHed

 

It appears (which was news to me also) that it is owned (at least it is now) by Barclays. As I have nothing in writing, I just keep asking the collectors on the phone for more info each time they ring. I have started writing a log of all these conversation just for future reference.

 

Jayne

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to discover the exact relationship between the lease company and the bank. If Barclays have always owned the vehicle, you may be on a hiding to nothing. However, if ownership has transferred to them WHILE you have had possession, I suspect the situation will be different.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It cannot go on the stolen car registry as the car was never stolen. To steal means to deprive someone of their property without their permission. You had permission to use the car until the end of the lease term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MrSHed

 

It appears (which was news to me also) that it is owned (at least it is now) by Barclays. As I have nothing in writing, I just keep asking the collectors on the phone for more info each time they ring. I have started writing a log of all these conversation just for future reference.

 

Jayne

 

Write to the collectors immediately, via recorded delivery, and state that you will no longer deal with matters via the telephone.

 

a) this will add delays to anything, so you can work towards keeping the car until the end of its lease;

b) it will provide you with a verifiable audit trail of their threats and actions. It is very easy for them to say something on the phone and then later deny it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...