Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes. They won't inform your employer but you may need to. You need to check what it says iin your employment contract. I don't think it usually causes huge problems for most people. HB
    • Good afternoon. I've read a few threads briefly regarding a dmp with stepchange and was 95% complete with setting one up when I noticed the advice of letting things default instead and/or managing a dmp yourself. My current situation is the following £470 owed to Jacamo. Has not defaulted. Currently on a £10 payment plan with them for 12 months. Not sure what to do here £2700 owed to Vanquis - Credit Card. Has not defaulted and I have not missed payments. I am unemployed and even making a £200 payment from my benefit means £80 odd gets eaten thanks to interest. Guessing I let this default and then set up a payment plan after? £2500 owed to Lowell who bought from Very and passed on to Overdales after I ignored them. Last payment to Lowell was 30th November 2022. Plan here was to fight them in small claims court if it ever gets that far, assuming the worst. Any advice is very much appreciated, thank you.
    • will they inform my employer and sack me?  
    • Ok, so they will look back a max of 1 year's record and ask me to tick which ones were used by me?  
    • Not prison, no. That has never happened here. I think they can look back a year on their system and you'll have something like TiredDodo did when they were summoned to court. With a year's use, I'll be amazed if you don't have a court appearance. HB  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Central Trust £25 Loan PPP refund


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi have passed all of this over to FOS for them to deal with as there seems a lot of conflicting advices on here, and when advice and help asked for there seems to be no one who can take you through the steps

i thought this was an ACTION group not an ADVICE group

advice is always given and i am sure people are thankful in pointing people in the right directions, it is then that people need help, they need the step by step guide and sometimes yes, a helping hand as this helping hand keeps them focused and determined.

it is when people are given all different types of advice that they becoe disallusioned with the forum and either go to these firms which take your money or the FOS or even give up all together .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

whats that all about..........???

 

this is a voluntary self help site

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

As you all know my history with this company, when the court decided in 2011 that ppi recipients who were missold could claim.

Well I recieved the final letter in 2009 from ct capital.. Then I went to the FOS, today I recieved a letter from FOS stating that because I sent my complaint to FOS after the 6 month ruling that my claim is invalid.

That was from the FOS ,

We're do I go.

What do I do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or could I not refuse any future payments and get them to take me to court.

I ask that as because I have been paying the ppi payment since 2007 at 100.00 a month. So for 5amd a half years I have been paying the ppi payment even though they cancelled it in 2007 (late)

So I am 5500 .00 in advance of my payments

Payments 363.00

Ppi 96.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen that you were self employed when this PPI was taken out.

 

Without me reading the whole thread, why did the lender refuse your PPI reclaim?

 

If you stop paying then your credit file would be affected as they will default you and mark the file (don't now if that is an issue for you?).

 

They rebated you for the PPI when you cancelled the policy and reduced the loan balance so that part of it is taken care of. It is the part before the rebate that you would be looking to get back plus the relevant interest.

 

As regards getting a previously rejected claim re-opened, have a look here.

 

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cardsloans/article-1720754/Banks-lose-PPI-ruling-Can-you-still-claim.html

 

The chances are very slim unless there are other reasons you have which were not put forward at the time of the original claim.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lender refused saying that they did not miss sell the ppi.

They refunded the initial rebate to the account, but did NOT reduce the monthly payment

So I am paying for the loan AND the ppi payment.

As stated 363.00 for the loan and 96for the ppi this I am still paying

They have not and refuse to lower the payment to the loan payment only

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they just said we did not mis-sell it....no reasons or explanation. That is unusual.

 

If they gave you a rebate when the policy was cancelled and reduced the balance on the loan then that means that the repayments stay the same but the loan term will be shorter.

 

It is either rebate the as yet unused amount to the account and leave the repayments the same or give no rebate but restructure the repayment so that they go down. Not both.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a letter from CTCApital my last payment date is jan 2017.

10 years after the loan started so no reduction in loan term there.

And the rebate was for the up front payment of the ppi

 

What I am asking is if they cancelled the up front ppi payment and rebated about 2000 thereabouts i think then by cancelling that, then all future payments for ppi cannot be charged to the account

It's as if I am paying for something I have had cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the interest rate stays the same as on the original agreement and the repayments remain the same as on the original agreement but there has been an extra reduction in the balance at some point (in this case a rebate) and all other things being equal then it is mathematically impossible for the loan to run its original term.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell that to CTCAptial. That is what I have been trying to do

To get a reduction in the original payment.

 

I have no problem paying the 363.00

My gripe is the extra 96.00 per that I am paying.

Can I refuse to pay that 96.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original loan was for 25000

So the 363 is the repayment over the 10years approx 36300 that is about right for the interest and loan payment

If I carry on paying the 96.00 for the 10 years then the total paid comes out at over 51000

Now that was the loan+interest+ppi total

Link to post
Share on other sites

You said that they credited £4,047 to the account. That reduces the balance by £4,047. This was not a refund of PPI paid....this was a rebate on the cancellation of a PPI policy.

 

Given that the balance has reduced by some £4,000 so will the interest charges from that point onwards.

 

So you will not end up paying for PPI that wasn't used and you won't be paying interest on the amount credited t the account because the balance on which interest is calculated from month to month is £4k less.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No because they have given you back the future PPI payments in the £4k reduction in the overall loan amount.

 

So by carrying on the with the repayments as they were, your loan should come to an end sooner.

 

The only safe way to reduce the payments is agree with them an amendment to the agreement so that it is restructured to finish at the originally planned point.

 

If you do it off your own back and just reduce the payments they will probably default you so any amendment to payments must be agreed between the two parties.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...