Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Central Trust £25 Loan PPP refund


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4236 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone, been an avid reader of CAG and find it very interesting :)

i took out secured loan with the above firm, and upon their advice took with it a PPP (payment protection plan)

now after a couple of years, i found out by accident that i would not be covered by the ppp in the event of me being made redundant, as i am self employed.

i DID inform them in the application form, and by telephone when they rang that i was self employed.

the loan i took out was for 25000.

and a ppp to suit that amount.

i approached central credit with a letter stating that i want to cancel my ppp with them and they creditied me with 4087 pounds.

now question is

as it was paid up front and added to the loan, can they attach it to the remaining balance without reducing my payments.

can i ask them to refund the money to me in full

or can i ask fro reduced payments in lieu of the 4087 for a period of time.

looking forward to a great debate with this

regards richard :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hello and Welcome, bobbydog.

 

I'll move this thread to the PPI Forum, think you'll get more help in there.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

hi there, not posted for a while,

am needing help with a central trust issue

claimed back PPI last year,

 

loan ppi

25,000 7023.80 ppi

16,625 int chg 4321.00 int chg

1,875. broker fee

 

18,650 total 4321.00 tot. chg, credit

 

repayments monthly 462.97

 

cancelled PPI they and they refunded 4047.22 to the account dropping the total balance from 29,780 to 25,732.95

the monthly repayment has stayed the same of 462.97 this has gone on now for over a year.

i think i am having the wool pulled over but don't know what i am missing

central trust state to me that the payments have to remain at that price.

also i never recieved a FULL refund or interest paid to date or anything

CAN anyone help please ...........................:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this loan still running?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

last letter i recieved from central trust stating that this is their final responce, where do i go now, the thing i don't get is that it was a single premium payment paid at the beginning of the loan, for 7023.80 and when i cancelled the PPI i only had 4047.22 deducted from the balance remaining.

so the remaining 29,780.17 was reduced to 25732.95. so from day one of the loan i was repaying 462.97 and today i am still paying 462.97 there has been no reduction in the monthly payments there has been no reduction in the total monthly payments, i, myself have recieved not a penny nor any interest or any payment whatsoever, apart from the reduction as stated above. i did sar and cca and have lots of docs here my question is AM I MISSING SOMETHING !!!! have i been hogwashed yet again ALL payments to these people are up todate and without any arrears

please can some one take me under there wing and guide me to a conclusion whether it be satisfactory or not, i just need to beat these ^&%*** ards

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry bob

 

i'm very busy at present

 

but no their payment cannot be right

 

i need to sit down and do some calcs but not got time, poss midweek...

 

if you can find one of my posts to someone in this ppi section recently, i details the process,

 

more later off to the airport.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there, not posted for a while,

am needing help with a central trust issue

claimed back PPI last year,

 

loan ppi

25,000 7023.80 ppi

16,625 int chg 4321.00 int chg

1,875. broker fee

 

18,650 total 4321.00 tot. chg, credit

 

repayments monthly 462.97

 

cancelled PPI they and they refunded 4047.22 to the account dropping the total balance from 29,780 to 25,732.95

the monthly repayment has stayed the same of 462.97 this has gone on now for over a year.

i think i am having the wool pulled over but don't know what i am missing

central trust state to me that the payments have to remain at that price.

also i never recieved a FULL refund or interest paid to date or anything

CAN anyone help please ...........................:)

 

can you give me the date of your first payment and when they refunded.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

date loan was signed please

and length [60 payments?]

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry and length of loan [mths/payments]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great

i'll try tonight

30 mins

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

loan total:£462.97x120=£55,556.40p

 

is this right ?

 

is it on the agreement?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i cant make any of the figure fit

it must be the way you have listed them

 

can you please scan up the agreement

remove all pers info but leave the figures.

 

i'll try again tomorrow.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

morning dx thanks for help last night could not scan doc, but have taken picture and loaded it in the photobucket (previous post) hope it helps :)

 

bumping

 

bumping

Edited by citizenB
merging of three bumps made on same day
Link to post
Share on other sites

evening all

 

been asked to drop in

 

what central trust has done is like my friends at welcome

 

all the interest has been piled up at the begining

its a con

in a sense , even though the ppi has been deducted, you are paying it back in the remaning interest

 

when they removed the ppi, a new agreement would need to be signed or at very least, an agreement to modify the original

 

please scan the agreement in full and post onto your thread so i can do the numbers

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...