Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mbna / restons defence for ccj help needed


zara35
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5197 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

IMHO, you should appeal, You need to kick that barrister up the Ar*e, he/should be doing the next job for free, otherwise name and shame him, just in case someone else is unfortunate enough to end up with him.

I beg to question why he even took on a case like this anyway, why he didnt question the amounts claimed etc.

I take it you asked for full statements etc.?

I'm sure with a little more work on your part you could have achieved a better result on your own. Unfortunately there are some duffers out there, but if your arguments are water tight, and they go against you, then the only answer is to appeal the judges decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys for all your advice.....

 

i am of the same opinion regards paying for a barrister......i knew it would be my down fall but i felt so unconfident.

 

I shall be seeking to get someone on a no win no fee basis......I do feel that an injustice has been done and i will be checking on the DN thing that since they have terminated they cant reissue a correct one.

 

Will keep you all informed

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys for all your advice.....

 

i am of the same opinion regards paying for a barrister......i knew it would be my down fall but i felt so unconfident.

 

I shall be seeking to get someone on a no win no fee basis......I do feel that an injustice has been done and i will be checking on the DN thing that since they have terminated they cant reissue a correct one.

 

Will keep you all informed

 

dont know where you are but are there not buddies near you?

 

i have volunteered but i am in kent

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zara

 

I think you are incredibily brave, to have had that outcome (unfair as it is) and go back at them with an appeal, good luck to you and I sincerely hope it all works out for you this time. I wont be feeling very brave if and when im put in that position and would probably be tempted to instruct a solicitor myself but I wont need to:

DD you got the job ;).

 

I will watch this thread with interest.

 

Ang

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all.

 

I have decided not to appeal on the advice of another Barrister. She did say I should have won but advised that if i lost on appeal I would be liable to larger costs on both sides and its just not worth the risks.

 

i have some more so I will just battle on with them and a bank charges case which is on hold.

 

Thankyou to all who advised and helped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

You may of run out of time for an appeal but if the agreement is totally unenforceable and cannot be enforced by a court because the judge would be acting ultra vires outside his powers set out by the CCA 1974 you can make a miscarriage of justice application to your local court cost will be 150.

 

Take it further it will not cost you that much more than the charges that Restons have applied. If you get a solicitor it will cost approximately one thousand extra.

 

Restons rely on people rolling over, not having the knowledge to fight back.

 

Remember it is restons case and the burden of proof is on them and a judge should be ashamhed of himself that he feel for Restons usual tactics. Judges do not know the issues and really do not care.

 

I would recommend that any defence to restons states that I refuse to plead because I have no knowledge of them and at the same time point out to the court that they have refused to present a valid CCA and cannot confirm it was signed by me. The grape about the 7 days and receiving own copy is a load of rubbish.

 

Remember solicitors have less ethics than a prostitute. They lie in court and twist everything to their clients advantage unfortunately judges just swallow it because they have another 20 cases to hear on that day and usually know less about the law than you. So the old professional network kicks in.

Edited by deckermbnahater
Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread, started in 2007 has now been updated and makes excellent reading for MBNA victims

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/120057-cabot-test-case.html

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
Hello CB!

 

I think the CPR they were referring to is this:

 

PART 6 - SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS - Ministry of Justice

 

IMHO, that is not applicable in any event, as it's to do with Service of Court related documents. That doesn't even mention 2nd Class, for example.

 

I think this is wholly to do with Claim Forms and all the related correspondence that is sent in relation to a Claim.

 

Note the first bit:

 

 

 

I take that to mean this area of CPR applies, unless something else already applies, such as The Interpretation Act 1978 and The Queens Bench Practice Direction 1985 that clarified the Interpretation Act 1978 to cover 1st Class (+2 Working Days) and 2nd Class Postage (+4 Working Days).

 

The CPR is not the correct reference, because applicable enactments and practice directions already apply when it comes to general documentation and notices that are not, in themselves, directly part of a Claim at the time they were sent.

 

Cheers,

BRW

 

 

 

As you say this CPR doesnt seem relevant, but just a note even if it was, Deemed Service 6.14 still says 2nd business day after sending.

 

 

PART 6 - SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS - Ministry of Justice

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...